Bahrain Elections Islamists Win Now

Posted on 11/02/2002 by Juan

Bahrain Elections: Islamists Win

Now that the second round in the Bahrain elections has been completed, it appears that the Sunni Islamists have a bare majority in the lower house of parliament. They have 22 of the 40 seats. Of the victors in the second round, only three are liberals (one Sunni and a Shiite). Seven are Salafi Sunnis, and seven belong to the Muslim Brotherhood’s National Islamic Forum. Another Sunni cleric won as an independent. Two Shiite Islamists won, though the Shiites (the country’s majority) were woefully underrepresented because they boycotted the elections. The other 20 seats were won by independents, but several of them were backed by the Islamists, so that apparently they contribute to the emergent Sunni fundamentalist majority.

All the women who ran were defeated.

Although some outside observers are touting the elections as a big breakthrough for democracy in the Arab world, I fear it is difficult for me to see it that way. The majority Shiite community boycotted the elections in protest against the fact that the upper chamber of parliament will be appointed, and will be able to over-rule the lower chamber.

So, in the end, we once again have been given a Duma by an Arab ruler. Worse, this ineffectual debating society is wholly unrepresentative. Most Bahrainis are Shiites, and most are more worried about social issues than about some Islamist utopia. Having the lower house dominated by Salafis and the Muslim Brotherhood in Bahrain is like having the Southern Baptists dominate the US Congress. (Most Americans are not Baptists, much less Southern Baptists, though it is a significant denomination).

Salafis and the Muslim Brotherhood are the spectrum of the Gulf population from which al-Qaeda sympathizers have come, though by no means all Islamists are violent. To have them be voted the majority in a parliament that presides over the Gulf naval base for the US fleet is a little worrisome. Of course, it may not matter much since they can be over-ruled by the appointed upper house.

But then why is all this a good thing, exactly?

0 Retweet 0 Share 0 StumbleUpon 0 Printer Friendly Send via email

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off | Print

Comments are closed.

  • Juan Cole

    Juan Cole

    Welcome to Informed Comment, where I do my best to provide an independent and informed perspective on Middle Eastern and American politics.

    Informed Comment is made possible by your support. If you value the information and essays, I make available and write here, please take a moment to contribute what you can.

  • IC Destinations



  • Keep up with Informed Comment at:

  • Donate to Global Americana Institute

    Donate to the Global Americana Institute to support the translation into Arabic of books about America.
  • Friends and Interlocutors:

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    • Omar Khayyam (23) (3)
      • Poplicola: Nice. The Whinfield translation has its own qualities of course. Quoth fish to duck, “‘Twill...
      • Greg Panfile: Loving these. I assume you are working from the same Persian source as Whinfield but doing new...
    • World’s 1.6 Billion Poor Going Green (6)
      • super390: I’m disappointed that there’s not more response to this posting. Prof. Cole is broaching a...
    • The Dilemma over Syria (29)
      • super390: I don’t see how either this or Libya could be defined as genocides unless the population of a...
      • Andy Lovas: Don’t agree at all. We are better than not to do everything we can to keep people from being...
    • Omar Khayyam (12) (3)
      • pabelmont: Is this a pre-global-warming lament? It seems to speak of doing the usual things that people do —...
  • Archives

  • Categories