British Forces In Basra Have Announced

Posted on 04/09/2003 by Juan

*The British forces in Basra have announced that the battle for that city has just about ended. They have taken most of the important government buildings and have 4000 troops with 200 tanks inside the city. Some Fedayee Saddam guerrillas still lurk in the twisting alleyways, but the populace has apparently lost all fear of them, and is openly welcoming the British troops and helping them destroy posters and statues of Saddam. Late reports say the British have appointed a local notable to govern the city. He is being called a “sheik” but I suspect they just mean prominent city elder.

*Warren Strobel is reporting that the US State Department and CIA are furious that Rumsfeld and others at the Defense Department flew Ahmad Chalabi and a thousand fighters to Iraq and set them up at an airport near Nasiriya. State and the Company are convinced that Chalabi is corrupt and unreliable. They thought they had forestalled his installation as leader of Iraq, but Rummy and gang “just did it anyway.”

*Iran’s parliament passed a bill allowing the elected President, Khatami, to over-ride the judicial review of the appointed Guardianship Council. The Council has the power to strike down laws passed by parliament that it feels contradict Islamic law (read: their hardline views of politics). Of course, the Guardianship Council says it will simply strike down this new law attempting to limit its purview. Hardliners in Iran’s judiciary have closed 90 liberal newspapers and journals, have sentenced outspoken writers to imprisonment or even death, and have even had 3 members of parliament arrested for speeches given on the floor of parliament (contradicting article 86 of the Iranian constitution). The Guardianship Council had better be careful about acting too high-handedly. The winds of change are blowing.

*The Emir of Qatar has suggested that a permanent council on Christian-Muslim dialogue be created, with its seat in Doha. The last time there was an important Christian-Muslim dialogue movement was in Lebanon during the late ’60s and early ’70s. I would never have expected a Wahhabi emir to argue for such a thing. I hope something comes of his idea; it would be an important institution.

0 Retweet 0 Share 0 StumbleUpon 0 Printer Friendly Send via email

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off | Print

Comments are closed.

  • Juan Cole

    Juan Cole

    Welcome to Informed Comment, where I do my best to provide an independent and informed perspective on Middle Eastern and American politics.

    Informed Comment is made possible by your support. If you value the information and essays, I make available and write here, please take a moment to contribute what you can.

  • IC Destinations



  • Keep up with Informed Comment at:

  • Donate to Global Americana Institute

    Donate to the Global Americana Institute to support the translation into Arabic of books about America.
  • Friends and Interlocutors:

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    • Omar Khayyam (23) (3)
      • Poplicola: Nice. The Whinfield translation has its own qualities of course. Quoth fish to duck, “‘Twill...
      • Greg Panfile: Loving these. I assume you are working from the same Persian source as Whinfield but doing new...
    • World’s 1.6 Billion Poor Going Green (6)
      • super390: I’m disappointed that there’s not more response to this posting. Prof. Cole is broaching a...
    • The Dilemma over Syria (29)
      • super390: I don’t see how either this or Libya could be defined as genocides unless the population of a...
      • Andy Lovas: Don’t agree at all. We are better than not to do everything we can to keep people from being...
    • Omar Khayyam (12) (3)
      • pabelmont: Is this a pre-global-warming lament? It seems to speak of doing the usual things that people do —...
  • Archives

  • Categories