Iraq's Economic Doldrums
With reference to my comment on Sunday about Iraq's economy being a mess, and my link to a Guardian article on the anxieties in the Amec Corp. about whether the repairs done in Iraq will last in the face of guerrilla sabotage. An informed reader wrote:
'Note that The Guardian paraphrases an Amec representative to the effect that much of their infrastructure work (electricity, water treatment and distribution, waste disposal) has been repair. The equipment is a mixture from French, Russian and other sources, and is old. What the Amec person was referring to was maintenance and spare parts, even apart from insurgent efforts. There is one plant where spare parts had to be custom-fabricated in Germany, because the machinery was no longer produced. Because of the time limits on the USG financing, there are no contracts or no funds, for maintenance and repair. There was a battle at the CPA early on, which the good guys lost: repair or build and install only new and state of the art . . . A subtle point was that, in addition to better providing services to the Iraqis, the installation of good new equipment would be an example for the future as to how things should be done.
Among the issues next up is how, and with what policies and personnel, the UIA majority will administer the economy. I have concern that, in terms of personnel, they have a limited talent pool of “scientists.” Saudi Arabia is as successful as it is in substantial part because, even now, there are on the order of 10,000 Americans, gradually over time being replaced by Saudis, working for Aramco. A byproduct of the insurgency is that foreigners will be difficult to employ. It is not only technology, which, in theory, can be transferred by contract, but know-how, which cannot.
And, again, where is the $7 billion of 2006 “sustainment costs” (SIGIR Bowen) for the Army and police going to come from?
To a significant extent, the $18.4 billion was wasted. To give only one example, when Bremer lifted tariffs in the interest of “free trade,” 1 million cars came in, but not a liter was added to Iraq’s refining capacity. The amount already sent to Kuwait for gasoline could have financed the cost of two major new refineries plus.
In short, they are either going to have to borrow money or make do and muddle through. Even with the Paris Club debt-reduction, and now the private creditor settlement, which will involve the issuance of $3 billion in bonds this Thursday, at present oil export levels, they will have too much debt. The pressures to enter into less-than-optimum oil-field deals will be substantial.
As you say, it is to weep. '

|
Facebook




3 Comments:
Right on the top of this blog entry, I want to deviate from the ME focus and turn you to the other America where the rise of the political Left continued with the election of Chile's first woman president, Michelle Bachelet... As the Washington Post reported, the rise of the political Left is now a region-wide phenomenon, sweeping across five other countries:
With Bachelet's election, Chilean voters continued a region-wide trend toward the political left in national elections. The most recent presidential elections in Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Uruguay and Bolivia have brought liberal or socialist candidates to power, creating two distinct groupings of leaders in South America. In countries such as Venezuela and Bolivia, the prevailing political discourse questions the benefits of free-trade agreements and encourages more independence from U.S. government and business interests. Bachelet, however, is expected by analysts to fall into the second grouping, represented by fiscally conservative presidents who aim to direct government spending toward social programs.
My take on this is that democracies in large but poor countries shall almost always swing to the Left if free elections are allowed, just as largely poor Arab or Muslim countries shall also swing to nationalist and pan-Islam or pan-Arab parties...
The reasons for this are simple enough - the poor being the majority will always elect parties that appeal to their priorities - but somehow these reasons are always missed by our high and mighty media commentators... Most of these Ummrikkan commentators have never lived in poverty, or around poverty... They can offer no effective solution to solve the 25-year-old 15% poverty rate in the United States, but they opine from their high rises of ways to deal with poverty in countries with poverty levels of 30% or more...
As long as the Cold War could be used as an excuse, the high and mighty commentators, who are mouthpieces for their political masters, disguised their affinity for greedy corporations by citing the fear of a communist sweep across the world... In every country they used their dictators and puppet Kings and straw Shahs to break the back of poor people's movements, be they leftist or nationalist...
Even though the Bushiites still bray on about the threat of Cuban influence, it is now difficult to claim a communist scare in South America and destroy the democracy of the poor... However, the suppression of free elections continues in the Arab and Muslim world because the Bushiites have found a fear factor to replace communist bogeyman - radical Islam.
"State of the art" versus "repair" misses the point, with respect Professor Cole. Both are vulnerable to insurgent sabotage. Installing state of the art means US or German power plants, making Iraq dependent on those countries for spare parts and expensive service contracts. The problem, I think, was in giving repair contracts to foreign companies instead of mobilizing the Iraqi technicians and engineers who had worked miracles to keep the plants running during sanctions. Use local resources to get the plants at least up to pre-invasion levels (which the U.S. has not been able to do.) Install state of the art stuff only after peace and security are established.
John Howley said...
Installing state of the art means US or German power plants, making Iraq dependent on those countries for spare parts and expensive service contracts
Dependence on other countries is - as the post pointed out - also the case with repair. Further, that it's very often more expensive to keep repairing very old and out-of-production equipment than it is to simply install new. Even further, spare parts would have to come from outside Iraq regardless so your point as regards dependency is invalid, and as far as the actual service, Iraqi engineers are neither unintelligent nor uninformed, and they could certainly learn how to repair even state-of-the-art equipment in short order, negating the need for entended service contracts.
mobilizing the Iraqi technicians and engineers who had worked miracles to keep the plants running during sanctions. Use local resources to get the plants at least up to pre-invasion levels
This would be fine, except that the implications of your own statement - combined with the wartime and post-wartime destruction - is the fact that the (material) resources to do this no longer exist, or are at least grossly insuffcient for this purpose.
Install state of the art stuff only after peace and security are established.
The real answer is: supply the Iraqi people with all the material resources and know-how (of course employing and teaching as many Iraqis and as few foreigners as possible in the process) to build state-of-the-art infrastructure and keep it running free of charge (while also of course working simultaneously on actually training Iraqi forces, actually supporting a true Iraqi government, and having US forces leave completely as soon as asked) until the Iraqi economy and government finds its footing. As a result, everybody gets water, electricity, etc, nearly all the support for the insurgency dries up, and the US gets some good PR to help balance all the bad. So it's more cost-effective in the long run both for the Iraqis and the US.
Thus, installing state-of-the-art infrastructure has to occur first, else peace and security will never be established.
SR
Post a Comment
<< Home