US Helicopter Shot Down
Sunni Arabs Cannot Block Formation of Government
Guerrillas north of Mosul engaged Iraqi police in a firefight. When a US helicopter came up to support the police, the guerrillas appear to have shot it down, killing two GIs.
I disagree with the conclusions The Scotsman draws in reporting on on the numbers of seats gained by various parties in the recent election in Iraq. An official tally will probably come next week. I'm grateful that they managed to get some advance word on numbers (they are not alone). But I think their analysis put the emphasis on the wrong thing.
They estimate that the Allawi Iraqiyah list will shrink to only 25.
The Sunni fundamentalist National Accord Front will have 42.
The secular Arab nationalist National Dialogue Council will have 11.
These three formed a Rejection Front demanding an investigation into voting fraud. They hoped to block the election of a president by parliament who did not accept some of their key demands. To do so, they would need 93 seats. It appears that they have 78, and so cannot by themselves block the formation of a government.
Assuming these numbers are firm, this is the key point that any article about these numbers should have made: "Rejection Front fails to Secure 1/3 + 1, Cannot Block Selection of President."
Even if some small parties (religious Kurds?) vote with the Rejection Front, they almost certainly cannot pick up another 15 seats.
The Scotsman alleges that the Shiite fundamentalist United Iraqi Alliance (129 seats) and the Kurdistan Alliance (52 seats) won't have the the 183 seats (2/3s of 275) needed to select a president all by themselves. But they do in fact seem to have 181. The news here is that they have done just as well as they predicted, and are in striking distance of being able to form a government.
It is not clear whether the paper is counting the one seat won by the Sadrist Risaliyun or Mission Party, which has announced that it will vote with the Shiite UIA. If not, that would take the Kurds and Shiites to 182, only one vote short of two-thirds. Six seats have still not been apportioned, and only one would have to go to a UIA ally to give them 2/3s. This outcome strikes me as highly likely.
In fact, two or three members of parliament may just have been given a Wish Machine, since if they are the pivotal votes that allow the Kurds and Shiites to avoid being blackmailed by the Rejection front, then they can pretty much make any demand they want and it will be granted. Small religious parties in Israel have benefitted from similar situations in the past.
If the Rejection Front had managed to secure 93 seats, they could have, e.g., demanded that the Ministry of Interior go to Iyad Allawi. Shiite nationalist Muqtada al-Sadr, however, has already said that the participation of the Allawi list in the government is a red line that must not be crossed. Sadr's bloc is central to the United Iraqi Alliance. The resulting standoff could have produced governmental gridlock and given the guerrillas an opening to spread chaos again.
The most likely scenario now is that the Shiite fundamentalists and the Kurds will form a national unity government by wooing the Sunni religious coalition, the Iraqi Accord Front, to join them and to desert Allawi and the National Dialogue Council. If the Shiites and Kurds actually can put together a 2/3s majority, they can present the Sunni fundamentalists with a choice of joining the government and getting cabinet posts, or of being left in the cold as part of an opposition.
Since the ordinary business of parliament will be conducted by a simple majority, the Kurds and the Shiites could simply outvote the Sunni Arabs every time. Indeed, the Shiite fundamentalists only need to pick up 8 or so allies to be able to win every vote all on their own.
A canny German observer sees the recent leak that German intelligence officers in Baghdad supplied intelligence to the Americans before the war as payback by US intelligence agencies. They are said to be settling scores with the Social Democratic Party's holier than thou attitude when it was in power and also to be firing a shot across the bow of conservative PM Angela Merkel in reaction to her call for the Guantanamo detention facility to be closed.
US investigators have confirmed that the Saddam Hussein regime used chemical weapons against the Shiites who rose up against his regime in 1991. Some 60,000 Shiites were killed in April of 1991 when Saddam used helicopter gunships and armor to crush the rebellion. The US could have interdicted the helicopters from firing, but chose not to. Then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney maintained that the Saudis had expressed unhappiness about the prospect of a Shiite take-over of Iraq. .

|
6 Comments:
1) This leak concerning the activities of the German intelligence officers in Baghdad is psychologically very strong, because everyone remembers that the Iraq war begun with the dropping of a huge bomb on that Al Mansour restaurant where Saddam Hussein was supposed to have dinner. So it is a very powerfull accusation to say that the German intelligence helped with the very first hit in Iraq.
2) The target seems to be the actual foreign minister, who is a close friend of Shröder and was the intelligence coordinator of Shröder. By entereing in the coalition with Merkel, the SPD negotiated different political points and one of these points was that the foreign policy won't know fundamental changes with respect to the former SPD policy (the SPD had already begun fence mending before the election of Merkel, for instance sending German troops in Afghanistan).
3)Apparently this isn't enough to the Americans. They don't want partners, they want lackeys, like Blair, Berlusconi or Aznar. The Americans aren't only returning to colonization in the ME, they are meddling in the internal affairs of their allies in EU.
4) They may well get the head of Steinmeier.. but probably not a fundamental change in the German foreign policy. The linked article of the Independant shows clearly why : 72% of the Europeans are opposed to the US foreign policy and that number tops to 83% in Germany. Even with a new foreign minister, the German coalition can't wage a foreign policy in complete contradiction with its base.
The fact that Al-Hakim has recently announced that there will be no substantial amendment to the constitution undoubtedly reflects his own assessment that the UIA and the Kurds will have the votes to form a government without Sunni participation.
The latest report from Baghdad is that the election results will not be released next week.
>"It is impossible to have the final election results this week," Safwat Rashid, a senior member of the Independent Electoral Commission of Iraq told The Associated Press. He was referring to the Islamic week, which began Friday and ends on Thursday. A senior official with an international team assessing the results at the request of the IEIC said the group won't issue its own findings for at least another week.<
The AP story also reminds us that the election "monitors" are essentially there to reconstruct events that happened weeks before their arrival.
>Monitors from the International Mission for Iraqi Elections arrived at the beginning of January after Sunni Arab and Shiite secular parties alleged widespread fraud and intimidation in the Dec. 15 parliamentary elections.<
When discussing the "2/3 + 1" requirement, does that formula apply to the total number of seats in Parliament, or to the number of those present and voting? Since the life expectancy of members is somewhat less than that of coal miners, it would seem to make a difference.
The Sunni fundamentalists have already broken rank and our Prof has got it about right.
However, all these calculations are relevant only to the Green Zone Fantacy Land. Iraq is a failed state, and laws, including the constitution, are onlt theory because the are not enforcable.
Kirkuk is a good example. The USA gave it to the Kurds in April 2003 but the combined forces of the Kurds and the Americans has so far failed to control it. What chance do the Kurds have when the Yanks leave? What difference would the constitution make? Which major oil company would risk billions in such an environment?
How many votes in the Council of Representatives are needed to select the President of Iraq?
Article 67 (online translation from Washington Post website) provides:
>>First: The Council of Representatives shall elect, from among the nominees, the President of the Republic by a two-thirds majority of its members.
Second: If any of the candidates does not receive the required majority vote then the two candidates who received the highest number of votes shall compete and the one who receives the highest number of votes in the second election shall be declared as President.<<
It seems to be only the first-round vote that requires a 2/3 majority; the second-round vote drops to a simple majority.
I've heard rumors of a significantly higher number for 731 (in the 30s). This may be due to allocation of compensatory seats but I'm not sure they would get so many. The other number no one has spoken much about is "50" That is the number of members it takes to call for a no confidence vote, which then must pass by an absolute majority.
Post a Comment
<< Home