Informed Comment

Monday, March 27, 2006

Cole on Television

I'll be interviewed in the ABC Evening News Monday evening.

Also I'll be a guest on the Lehrer Show, PBS.

6 Comments:

At 11:43 PM, Friendly Fire said...: Give them HELL

The US invasion of Iraq was not needed or neccesary.
At 1:49 AM, Steve said...: I guess you can give them all of the "good news" in Iraq that they haven't been reporting.
At 1:51 AM, Don Quixote said...: Excellent! I get the Lehrer show over here (Australia); I'll be very interested to hear what you have to say.
At 7:42 AM, johnMccutchen said...: In case you missed it as I did...
In case you missed both as I did...

NewsHour March 27, 2006, 8pm EST
Al-Sadr Influence Grows in Iraq

The scion of one of Iraq's most powerful Shiite clerical families, Muqtada al-Sadr has emerged as one of the most potent political and military leaders in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq and as one of the most vocal critics of the U.S. occupation.

Judith Yaphe, former Middle East analyst at the CIA, and Juan Cole, a history professor at the University of Michigan, explain al-Sadr's evolving role in Iraq.

Profile: Muqtada al-Sadr

I haven't watched 24/7 news networks or much of national network news lately, relying on the NewsHour most nights but I have seen a few ABC WorldNews shows lately and seems they've been a bit miffed lately after GWB and Cheney decided to haul out the media a whipping boys for their latest road show.

Couldn't have anything to do with Bob Woodruff would it?
At 7:43 AM, johnMccutchen said...: In case you missed it as I did...
In case you missed it (both) as I did...

NewsHour March 27, 2006, 8pm EST
Al-Sadr Influence Grows in Iraq

The scion of one of Iraq's most powerful Shiite clerical families, Muqtada al-Sadr has emerged as one of the most potent political and military leaders in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq and as one of the most vocal critics of the U.S. occupation.

Judith Yaphe, former Middle East analyst at the CIA, and Juan Cole, a history professor at the University of Michigan, explain al-Sadr's evolving role in Iraq.

Profile: Muqtada al-Sadr

I haven't watched 24/7 news networks or much of national network news lately, relying on the NewsHour most nights but I have seen a few ABC WorldNews shows lately and seems they've been a bit miffed lately after GWB and Cheney decided to haul out the media a whipping boys for their latest road show.

Couldn't have anything to do with Bob Woodruff would it?
At 5:44 PM, John Koch said...: Saw the interview with Yaphe. No interview found at the ABC News site. A search for "Cole" yielded nothing for 3/27.

If the US really wanted to discredit Muqtada, wouldn't it be smartest to declare him a friend, a closet convert, and announce a program of financial support? This reverse Midas touch seems to discredit dissidents elsewhere.

Interesting that ABC viewers polled concurred that Iraq coverage was too negative. Once again, Rove was ahead of the curve in sending W to the Wheeling pep rally to attack negativism in the press.

Independent of what one sees as truth in reporting, this raises a dilemma. People dislike gruesome war coverage, just as they dislike root canal, kidney stones, or migraines. Broadcast executives can hardly be blamed for fearing loss of viewers to lighter programs or Fox. People crave reassurance and humor. They want their heroes to triumph.

Imagine a televised debate between mixed nay-sayers Cole, Polk, Odom, and perhaps Raimondo, on one side; and AEI or washingtoninstitute.org cheerleaders, on the other. Trouble is, the format would not satisfy the fast pace demanded by viewers or sponsors. It would take at least 20 minute for each side to state its base case. Audiences would nod off or tune out during the counterarguments. People would be hard pressed to choose between arcane "facts" each side tries to cite. In the end, a poll of the audiences would probably reward the side that made the greatest appeal to people's basic beliefs: patriotism, liberty, the evils of terror, and loyalty to authority. The panel of critical spokespeople would leave a discordant impression and lose the poll, unless they somehow joined in advocating "something better" than the Bush policies.

A 70% "disapproval" rating of W does not necessarily translate into a 70% approval rating of an opponent.

Informed Comment

Monday, March 27, 2006

6 Comments:

Get my Widget