James Aronson Award for Social Justice Journalism 2005
I kept meaning to blog the nice award ceremony held April 12 in New York at Hunter College, at which the 2005 James Aronson Awards for Social Justice Journalism were handed out.
The unsinkable Molly Ivins was given a lifetime achievement award. She couldn't be there in person, but sent a wonderful videotape in which she warned against the corruption of news by the info-tainment industry and the demand of big corporations that news make a 15% profit for them. (This level of profit cannot be generated by real news, thus the rush to substitute scripted soap operas.)
Anthony Lewis, author and longtime columnist for the New York Times, also received a lifetime achievement award. He was there in person and it was a great honor to meet him.
Freelance cartoonist Kirk Anderson

received the award for his politica cartooning. You must check out his illustrations of Bush administration policies in the style of Maoist social realism. My favorite is, "Rugged individualism is strongest when we obey." Some publisher should get him to do a whole book!
Gary Fields of the Wall Street Journal (yes!) received an award for his courageous reporting on a bloated prison system collapsing under its own weight.
Kevin Fagan and Bryant Ward were recognized for making the homeless in San Francisco (15,000 strong) a "beat," reporting on them for the past 3 years. Fagan and Ward have explored innovative solutions to the problems of the homeless, about half of whom are families fallen on hard times and another third of whom have mental problems. They got the ear of Mayor Gavin Newsome and some of their suggestions have been implemented in SF, with already noticeable good results. My heroes.
Tracie McMillan of City Lights was honored for her reporting on the "disconnected," young adults who are "not in school, not working and not looking for work," and for her work on the working poor and the "new safety net."
For the first time, an award was given in the category of social justice blogging journalism, and Informed Comment was the recipient.
The "Notes on the Winners" says here:
Blogging at its Best: Juan Cole, Informed Comment.
' Blogging represents a significant new form of communication--sometimes merely scurrilous, sometimes a vital extension of public debate--and of journalism. "Informed Comment," Cole's Iraq War web log, shows the form reaching its highest social value. Cole, a professor of history at the University of Michigan, brings his scholarly expertise to the analysis of daily events. He speaks Arabic, Persian and Urdu and has lived for long periods in various places in the Middle East. As a blogger, he becomes a sort of hybrid scholar/journalist as he gathers links to US and international news, then draws from his professorial expertise to provide running commentary on the insurgency, the American military response, and nuances of Middle Eastern politics and religion. His easy, humorous style recalls I. F. Stone's Vietnam-era newsletters and makes his dispatches an indispensable tool for understanding the social justice implications of this complex conflict. '
My thanks to Peter Parisi and the other members of the award committee. I am humbled and honored to be in this company, and want to acknowledge that I couldn't do what I do without depending heavily on a legion of brave and perspicacious journalists and on courageous and principled progressive bloggers, many of whom will no doubt be winning this award over the years. And, of course, I get absolutely indispensable help and support from my wife, Shahin M. Cole. Thanks so much to the award committee for being so far-sighted as to include the blogging category!
--------
PS Just to remind everyone of my current project, to get Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and others translated and published in Arabic. Help is most appreciated, and we are well on our way!


2 Comments:
Congratulations! It was well deserved.
One of my favorite military observers of thw War in Iraq is William Lind, a consultant to the US Marine Corps whose articles On War appear from time to time at Defense and the National Interest and AntiWar.com web sites. Lind is a conservative of the Paleo stripe and I worked with him on a few issues when he served on Senator Taft's legislative staff in the early 1970's.
His latest is both timely and trenchant.
Sweeping Up the Debris
by William S. Lind
As recognition of the defeat in Iraq spreads, so also does the process of sweeping up the debris. Both civilian observers and a few voices inside the military have begun the "lessons learned" business, trying to figure out what led to our defeat so that we do not repeat the same mistakes. That is the homage we owe to this war's dead and wounded. To the degree we do learn important lessons, they will not have suffered in vain, even though we lost the war.
Most of the analyses to date are of the "if only" variety. "If only" we had not sent the Iraqi army home, or overdone "de-Ba'athification," or installed an American satrap, or, or, or, we would have won. The best study I have thus far seen does not agree. "Revisions in Need of Revising: What Went Wrong in the Iraq War [.pdf]," by David C. Hendrickson and Robert W. Tucker, puts it plainly:
"Though the critics have made a number of telling points against the conduct of the war and the occupation, the basic problems faced by the United States flowed from the enterprise itself, and not primarily from mistakes in execution along the way. The most serious problems facing Iraq and its American occupiers – 'endemic violence, a shattered state, a nonfunctioning economy, and a decimated society' – were virtually inevitable consequences that flowed from the breakage of the Iraqi state."
It is of interest, and a hopeful sign, that this blunt assessment was published by the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute.
Lind goes on to tackle the emerging excuse "if only we'd sent more troops"
A must read. As, along the same lines, is Anthony Cordesman's CSIS report released Wednesday.
The chickens are coming home to roost.
Who did lose Iraq anyway?
Three guesses - first two don't count
Post a Comment
<< Home