15 Dead in Shiite Mosque Bombing
Diwaniyah Street Fighting
This wire service says that some 40 died in guerrilla violence in Iraq these past few days.
Reuters reports civil war violence on Friday:
A suicide bomber in Baghdad struck a Shiite mosque, killing at least 15 and wounding 25. This is very bad, given the high sectarian tensions in the capital. It is the Buratha Mosque of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, which has been hit before. Some reports say he used a shoe bomb, but this confuses me since he seems to have been inside the mosque when it detonated, and you don't use shoes inside the mosque.
Guerrillas fired mortar rounds at a north Baghdad neighborhood, killing 3 persons and wounding 16.
Southwest of Yusufiyah near Baghdad, guerrillas attacked a US military checkpoint, killing one GI and perhaps as many as 3 (two are missing).
In the southern port city of Basra, roiled by sectarian violence visited on minority Sunnis by the majority Shiites (and sometime vice versa), guerrillas shot Shaikh Yusuf al-Hasan, a Sunni religious leader, down dead near the mosque where he led prayers.
US military criminal investigators are looking into the deaths of three Iraqis in US military custory in May.
Al-Zaman and AFP say that US and Iraqi military forces staged an assault Friday on the Euphrates Military District of the city of Diwaniyah, south Iraq. Some were parachuted in. The troops engaged in street battles with Iraqi guerrillas in the quarter.
The attack came after Multinational Forces and Iraqi police raided the house of Shaikh Muhammad al-Umrani, the preacher and prayer leader at the large al-Dagharah mosque. Al-Umrani was not arrested. The raid provoked the firing at the local multinational forces base of Katyusha rockets, which eyewitnesses said caused substantial property damage and may have led to casualties.

|
Facebook




5 Comments:
Its the same news day after day. My question is: Why are we in the middle east?
We deterred the only other military superpower, the former Soviet Union for 60 years so obviously we don't have to fear two-bit thugs in the middle east, so why are we there? The truth.
Bin Laden said he attacked on 9-11 because of our policies toward Israel. Are we in the middle east because of Israel, to create a "Greater Israel"?
We don't have empires today as they are historically known, we have globalization. We didn't have to colonize China in order for WalMart to be there. We didn't have to colonize India in order to take advantage of cheap labor. We didn't have to invade Mexico in order to take advantage of their labor, we just did away with our soverign borders. So why are we in the middle east?
If we were going to steal other countries' natural resources why didn't we start with Mexico which has oil resources? Why are we in the middle east? The truth.
Bush and the neo-cons have provoked the switch to petro-Euros and are exacerbating our economic problems since the petro-dollar came about as a result of diplomacy and statesmenship. So why are we in the middle east?
"US military criminal investigators are looking into the deaths of three Iraqis in US military custory in May."
Should the investigation lead to criminal charges, one imagines a defense argument would be, "Only following orders." This poses the question, "Exactly whose orders?"
Irony, it's everywhere.
The news of two missing soldiers brought reminders of Sgt. Keith Matt Maupin, who has been in missing status in Iraq since April 2004.
>>A week later, Arab television network Al-Jazeera aired a videotape showing Maupin sitting on the floor surrounded by five masked men holding automatic rifles. That June, Al-Jazeera aired another tape purporting to show a U.S. soldier being shot. But the dark, grainy tape showed only the back of the victim's head and did not show the actual shooting. The Army ruled it was inconclusive whether the soldier in the second tape was Maupin, and he has been promoted twice since his capture.<<
Apparently the treasure trove of Al Qaeda in Iraq documents seized since the death of Zarqawi, has not been useful in determining Sgt. Maupin's fate.
Beautifully written July Canute.
An aid asked Tony Blair before the invasion the reason they wanted to invade a country that was no threat to the UK or any other.
"Because it is easy" he answered.
Paul Wolfowitz's party piece was telling how in 1991 an entire Iraqi division, under B52 capet bombing, surrendered to an Italian journalist. He always received howling laughter at the extreme cowardice of the Iraqis from his American audience, except in the congress hearing after the invasion when it was deadly quiet.
Chalabi persuaded the Pentagon Likudist in their fantasy den that he had millions of followers in Iraq, including most of the generals. The Americans do not even have to fight. He is organizing uprisings as soon as they get in. They never checked because he told them that Israel will have a free hand in Iraq under his rule, and so would the US Oil firms.
So the reason my friend is that the Americans who plotted the invasion believed their own spin and thought they could colonize, because they were so powerful and clever.
It is very disturbing to read of continual explosions in these buildings which collectively make up some of the wonders of the world in terms of architecture --I don't think most in the U.S. could comprehend an equivalent, or really have a good understanding of the historical and cultural impact of these structures, start for example with this one, and then see how you feel when you read reports like this.
Post a Comment
<< Home