At least 80 Dead, with Students Slaughtered
No Security Chiefs
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki failed again on Sunday to appoint ministers of the interior and defense, two key security posts at a time of increased violence. The Supreme Council (hard line Shiites) is still trying to hold onto the ministry of interior (domestic policing), which is one way it ensures the primacy in police and other forces of members of its Badr Corps militia. Other Iraqi forces,and the Americans, do not want the post to go to SCIRI again.
Violence again shook Iraq on Sunday, as its civil war grinds on. At a small town a couple hours northeast of Baghdad, guerrillas pulled students off a bus and killed 24. Some reports say that the guerrillas let 4 Sunni students go. Some names, such as Omar, are give-aways that one is Sunni, but it is more likely that the story is fishy.
In Basra, Shiite police surrounded a Sunni mosque and killed 18 men within (according to al-Zaman). The police, who suffered two dead in the incident, appear to have suspected that the mosque was being used as a guerrilla base. The Sunni Pious Endowments board, in contrast, accused the Basra police of attacking the mosque and killing innocents within while they were praying.
The Association of Muslim Scholars (hard line Sunni) accused the US of planning a military attack on Ramadi of a scorched earth sort.
Al-Zaman says that 20 bodies were discovered by police in Baghdad on Sunday, likely victims of faith-based reprisals.
If we count up all the deaths mentioned by Reuters, including that of a GI in Anbar, they come to 62. Figure in the 5 extra bodies in Baghdad that al-Zaman reports, and the 6 policemen killed by a bomb in Mosul, reported by the same source, and raise the Basra Sunni mosque death toll to 20 as al-Zaman reports it, and I count 80 dead or announced dead on Sunday. Even to a US media as jaded by now about this violence as our own, that should stand out as an exceptional day. But it won't. The totals of deaths are being reported in the 20s as far as I can see. Even just the Reuters accounts would take you to 62.
Al-Zaman/ AFP say that hundreds of protesters came out Sunday in the southern Shiite city of Samawah, demanding the removal of Muthanna governor Muhammad Ali al-Hassani, whom they blamed for the lack of fuel, drinking water, electricity and services. The demonstration was fired on by police, and in the riot 18 persons were wounded, 12 of them policemen. They had been throwing stones and bottles at government buildings. When they were fired on, they grew enraged and tried to invade some of those government buildings. At the Water Utilities building, they broke out windows and set the frame afire. On Saturday, the governor had used local television to broadcast a strict prohibition against any demonstrations. Shops are closed in the city and flames are rising from some points. Iraqi security forces have closed off some streets.
Borzou Daragahi of the LA Times gets the story on the Shiite militias of Basra. They both contribute to law and order of a sort and also constrain civil liberties. Their most pathological manifestation is the death squads that having been hitting Sunnis and secularists (and, apparently, Marsh Arabs and other militias).
Criminal gangs and guerrillas both use pipeline sabotage as an aid to petroleum smuggling, which finances more guerrilla actions and more criminality . . . What the drug trade was to insurgencies in Viet Nam and Afghanistan, petroleum is to the Iraq War. Only, the CIA appears to have encouraged and benefitted from the former, whereas the latter both hurts the US economy and enables disorder in a country the US is trying to control.
The Iraqi government says that 180,000 Iraqis have been displaced by faith-based ethnic cleansing since mid-February. That would be a civil war all on its own.

|
Facebook





8 Comments:
I just want to note that Pat Buchanan has an excellent column on what is happening to the Palestinins now that the "embargo" has been put into effect.
Am Con Mag
This is not the path to peace, but those pushing us down this path clearly do not want peace do they?
Yes, all of the major news services' daily reports have only a portion of incidents -- they overlap, but no one of them is nearly complete. Any given newspaper -- such as the Boston Globe, that I read every day for some masochistic reason -- will run one account, typically the AP account, or possibly a WaPo reprint, which gives the impression that it's a complete roundup of reported incidents, but it never comes close.
At Today in Iraq (which I wish you'd add to your blogroll but that's up to you) we do our best to aggregate all the sources. I don't read Arabic, unfortunately, but by putting together Reuters, AP, AFP, KUNA and occasionally English translations that you provide of Arabic sources we always have a far more impressive list than you get from any one of them. As you note, sometimes the casualty totals differ, and once in a while details of incidents differ and it's hard to tell if they're the same one.
Also, for some reason, the totals delivered to the Baghdad morgue each day are not consistently reported by the wire services although NPR somehow gets them and includes them in its headline newscasts. This number usually far exceeds the numbers from the police reports.
My concern is that the window provided into the situation in Iraq by the typical reports Americans see is highly selective. By omission, it offers a false picture.
Are the names of PM al-Maliki's nominees ever made public? Is there any notable attempt to balance by, say, proposing a Sunni to head Defense and a Shiite to head Interior?
Is much known about whether the nominees show any prior service in uniform or is this (or any Baath background) precisely what they must lack?
Is another problem that, whoever heads one or the other security ministry, they becomes de facto contenders to command the coup that overthrows the government when US forces "redeploy" as the US 2008 elections approach?
Exactly what forces presently consitute al-Maliki's "palace guard"? Does a single force or contractor protect the entire cabinet? Or does each minister get a cash stipend to support a retinue of bodyguards, howsoever picked?
Whoever writes the history of post-Saddam Iraq will have to interview the person overseeing US or UK intelligence of what is now going on in the two key ministries. Unfortunately, such people seldom keep diaries, write memoirs, or grant extensive interviews. In order to be career-enhancing, it would have to be mainly Bremeresque rah-rah.
And next it will become a regional war.
BUSH AND CHENEY NEED TO BE IMPEACHED!
The drug trade and drug "wars" have hurt the USA also.
It does not appear the CIA is behind the oil smuggling, but I think they are behind a lot of the terrorist bombings and death squads. We have had one report of Americans in plain clothes in a car that had bomb material in it, and one report of British in the same situation. These were not verified reports.... but they were not conclusively disproved by the US/UK military in Iraq either.
PLEASE JUAN: many of your admirers such as myself want you to re-address the principle of total immediate US withdrawal.You have said the US should keep a small presence to prevent civil war. We have said the US foments civil war in quest of submission. Do you agree with us yet or must there be a desert that is called peace (Tacitus)? The killing is unendurable.
"re-address the principle of total immediate US withdrawal" - Wardog100
Many of us have - and we're rolling reluctantly from immediate pullout to some form of phase-out, rather like Juan's idea. But it might have to be a fast phase-out if things go on the way they're going. Fast or slow, Iraq will need some sort of international backup. That will have to be the UN, at least in name. The Arab League members ideally would provide the lion's share of this, but they can't do it in any sense at all at the behest of the US. They wouldn't touch it under those circumstances. And we will have to give the Europeans a piece of the reconstruction action and more clearly free access to the oil concessions to get them on board. It won't be easy. And it won't be fast, unfortunately.
Cervantes, don't worry; all of us reading Juan's blog are reading Today in Iraq as well. A slightly different angle, and sometimes different news.
As in the American War on Vietnam, the presence of American military forces in the midst of Iraq's civil war -- that America unleashed -- only extends the interregnum of violence by preventing one of the contestants for power from winning.
The American military presence in Iraq does not prevent civil war -- obviously -- but only amplifies the carnage. America has no business in Iraq and the sooner America stops "helping" the sooner someone will "win" the three-year-old civil war -- by fighting or making political deals or some combination of both.
America has "helped" Iraq enough. Much more of this "help" and no one will remain alive in Iraq to receive it.
Post a Comment
<< Home