Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, July 09, 2006

European Union Condemns Israeli Predations
Israelis Kill Little Girl, Other Family Members
50,000 Turks Demonstrate


The Daily Telegraph Reports:

'Three Palestinian family members, including a six-year-old girl, were killed yesterday in an air strike near Gaza City as Israel rejected a call by Hamas Premier Ismail Haniya for a mutual ceasefire. The girl, her elder brother and her mother were killed in the air raid. Despite initial denials, the Israeli army later confirmed carrying out the strike in the neighbourhood of Sejayun. '


An estimated 50,000 Turks demonstrated in Istanbul on Sunday against the Israeli invasion of Gaza, which has left nearly 50

Courtesy Zaman

Palestinians dead. Zaman, a Turkish newspaper, writes,
' The protestors chanted slogans against Israel and the US, condemning the killing of innocent people and the inaction of the international community to protect innocent citizens. "Butchers of Pharaohs: Israel and USA", "Wake-up Muslims", and "Farewell to Sharon, Devotion to Hamas" were the main slogans chanted at the demonstration. The spokesman at the protest, which was organized by the pro-Islamic Happiness Party, said that world nations had turned a blind eye to the tragedy in the region as the Israeli army killed innocent people. '


Turkey has a secular constitution, and its military is allied with Israel, but the rise of political Islam in Turkey has put strains on the Turkish-Israeli relationship, and the Turkish public's disgust with Israeli actions in the Occupied Territories may become a factor in Turkish domestic politics. Islamists are the main beneficiary of the unresolved Palestine issue, which Kadima policies are exacerbating.

It goes without saying that the United States' own relations with the Turkish public, already damaged by the hugely unpopular Iraq War, are profoundly harmed by these Israeli crimes.

In Bahrain, the government allowed a demonstration on Friday. There is a US naval base in Bahrain.

Jordan cracked down on Islamist activists who tried to organize demonstrations in Amman.

Friday a week ago 3,000 Egyptians rallied at al-Azhar square in Cairo for the Palestinians, but the Egyptian government cracked down on further attempts by the Muslim Brotherhood to hold demonstrations.

If it weren't for authoritarian governments in the region, hundreds of thousands of people would be on the streets demonstrating as we speak. Since they can't demonstrate, they turn to Islamist politics and sometimes terrorism. Ironically, a sense of justice denied and outrage over human rights violations can actually turn people toward an acceptance of extreme measures.

The European Union on Sunday slammed Israel for plunging Gaza into a humanitarian crisis:
' ST PETERSBURG, Russia: The European Union accused Israel yesterday of a disproportionate use of force against Palestinians in Gaza and of making a humanitarian crisis there worse. It was the first time the 25-nation bloc had made such a sharp criticism of the Jewish state in the crisis triggered by the abduction of an Israeli corporal from a border post by Palestinian Islamic militants on June 25. “The EU condemns the loss of lives caused by disproportionate use of force by the Israeli Defence Forces and the humanitarian crisis it has aggravated,” Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen, whose country holds the EU’s rotating presidency, said in a statement on a visit to St Petersburg. It was released after 23 Palestinians were killed in the bloodiest day of fighting since 2004 on Thursday in military operations designed to stop rockets being fired into Israel. '


As always, see the invaluable Helena Cobban on why "they started it" isn't a valid response.

Of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, already growing last winter, Israeli adviser to the prime minister's office Dov Weisglass joked, "It's like an appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner, but won't die." Of course they will. Anything that makes the healthy thinner has the potential of killing the sick and the very young. And what kind of fascist "social-engineering" joke was that? Why hasn't this man been fired? Do US officials meet with him? Why?

There was already a severe health care crisis in Gaza before the Israeli government sat down and decided cold-bloodedly to destroy the Strip's only power plant a week and a half ago. You can't run a hospital without electricity. And a lot of medicines spoil without refrigeration. Even just keeping food for the patients from spoiling becomes a challenge without refrigeration-- so they end up getting gastroenteritis. For patients, babies and toddlers, this situation can be fatal. The United Nations Human Rights Council, including India and 28 other nations, have already demanded that Israel take steps to redress the humanitarian crisis.

Jon Alterman points out that the Bush-Olmert policy of dismantling the Palestinian Authority and creating chaos in the Occupied Territories (some of them now just Surrounded and Subjugated Territories) doesn't make any sense strategically for anyone. The policy certainly is fueling Islamist revivalism and will result in more terrorism. Mere fear of terrorism wouldn't be a reason to back down from a principled stance. But when violations of the Geneva Conventions also produce terrorism, then that is bad policy on two counts.


A boycott of corporations making possible Israeli expansionism, and of the products produced by colonial expropriation, is one of the few avenues civil society has to make some sort of feeble protest about the ongoing atrocities against the Palestinians. The Presbyeterian Church is leading the way in demonstrating ethical leadership on this issue.

Of course, it is wrong for the tiny Ezzedine Qassam brigades to fire their homemade little rockets at Sderot, and though they most often miss, they sometimes do harm individuals, which is terrorism. It is wrong for groups such as Hamas to conduct terrorist operations against Israeli civilians. It was wrong for three tiny guerrilla groups to kill 2 Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint and kidnap Cpl. Shalit. They must release him, now. Palestinians who make even more objectionable fascist social engineering comments than did Dov Weisglass are wrong and should be condemned. They should listen to Saudi Ambassador to the US, Turki al-Faisal, who called on them to turn to Gandhian nonviolence. None of these actions, however, remotely justifies the Israeli strangling of the entire Palestinian population of Gaza through attacks on the power plant, bridges and other infrastructure, the criminal kidnapping of scores of elected Palestinian politicians, or the interference with medical, food and other aid reaching people who need it. Or the stealing of more land in the West Bank.

Alain Gresh of Le Monde Diplomatique writes of Israeli war crimes [hat tip to Agence Global:
' The 1949 Geneva Conventions state, in article 54 of their additional protocol: “Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited”. It is also “prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population”. That means that the Israeli army’s latest offensive in the occupied territories amounts to war crimes; it includes the blockade of the civilian population and their collective punishment, the bombing of Gaza’s $150m power station, depriving 750,000 Palestinians of electricity in the intense summer heat, and the kidnapping on the West Bank of 64 members of the political wing of Hamas, including eight cabinet ministers and 22 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council. On 5 July the Israeli government said it would expand its military operation in Gaza. Israel has violated another principle of international law in this offensive: proportionality. Article 51 of the protocol forbids “an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.” Can saving one soldier’s life justify destruction on this scale? '


Israeli peace activist Dorothy Naor writes,
"I am speechless with grief, with frustration at not being able to do anything to stop Israel's atrocities. All I can do is to inform you and to ask those of you abroad to keep badgering your politicians wherever you live to stop Israel's government and military from continuing to commit war crimes and from Israel's senseless refusal to recognize that the Palestinians will not disappear, that they have rights, that they are human beings no less than are Israelis. Ask your politicians to recognize that Israel's government wants land not peace, that it must be made to realize that its continued wrongs and uses of force will not bring Israelis security any more than it will bring Palestinians to stop fighting for their freedom and rights and justice. The only way to stop Qasams is to recognize Palestinian rights. Force will not quell violence. Violence breeds violence-Israeli violence towards Palestinians breeds theirs towards Israelis."


Most Israel Lobby propaganda can be fairly easily refuted with three observations:

*Israelis are not above international law.

*Collective punishment is illegal according to the Geneva Convention.

*Two wrongs don't make a right.

12 Comments:

At 10:04 PM, Blogger SimoHurtta said...

Just before Palestinians ”kidnapped” the Israeli soldier, Israeli commandos had entered Gaza to kidnap two Hama’s members. The Palestinians “provocation” was big news, the Israelis earlier provocation not.

Maybe it is high time for the world to make Israelis a little “thinner” and demand a fast end for this lunatic 40 year long occupation with poisons the whole region. It is rather amusing that USA was / is ready for sanctions against Syria for their occupation of parts of Lebanon even that occupation had been by all measurements been far more “civilized” than the occupation of Palestine. On the same time Israelis are entitled to behave in extremely brutal way so long they use the words terrorist and suicide bomber and remind Americans we are democratic "they" are not. Well some example for democracies and for dictators.

 
At 11:29 PM, Blogger El Cid said...

While driving at 1:30am Sunday morning I heard the Fox News Radio news announcer (a female voice) say:

"An Israeli air strike in Gaza turns deadly."

Needless to say, I was struck dumb, as I couldn't think of too many airstrikes in civilian areas which weren't deadly.

 
At 2:23 AM, Blogger Robert Hume said...

I'm sorry to say that I read, I think in the "Forward" that the Presbyterian Church no longer advocates disinvestment ... due to various pressures. I note that your cited URL is dated 2004. I had been so proud of my denomination before they caved. And I am sorry that I did not participate in this initiative when I had the chance.

 
At 7:37 AM, Blogger Abhinav Aima said...

I think it is important to note, as Prof. Cole does here in his post, that some of the most ardent, honest and persistent critics of Israeli policies are Israeli citizens... I always check to read Uri Avneri's columns on the Gush Shalom web site to find that oft missing point of view...

I think that the U.S. media has bought hook, line and sinker the argument that killing civilians while pursuing "terrorists" among them is fair and legal... Of course, the Geneva Conventions specifically outlaw such practices - but who cares? What country is going to drag the United States or Israel before The Hague?

And yes, the U.S. has refused to recognize the authority of The Hague after the Reagan administration lost their case for war crimes in Nicaragua in 1984 - when the "freedom fighters forefathers" mined the harbors there...

The larger question here is how can one expect the public at large to appreciate the nuances of the laws of war when a significant section of the American public has been so gung ho about seeking retribution for 9/11 from anyone by any means possible...

When it comes to civilians in Iraq or Gaza - This is no longer about war... This is revenge. And revenge is a never ending bloodletting - just ask any Pashtun.

 
At 11:31 AM, Blogger Tarek D. said...

Juan,

I don't think it's fair to say that people 'turn to Islamist politics' if they are prohibited from demonstrating. Rather, they are prohibited from demonstrating precisely because they've already turned toward Islamist politics, not as a last resort, or an extreme position, but because it articulates, more than any other political discourse in the region, their political desires and aspirations.

 
At 1:22 PM, Blogger Cameron said...

Dr. Cole - Long time listener, first time caller. Given that recent polls show that most Palestinians support the kidnapping of Shalit and the firing of Qassams into Israel in order to terrorize the Israelis, what are the Israelis to do? They are not going to win over the hearts and minds of Palestinians who are committed to wiping out the "evil and false zionist regime" in order to live in a 2-state solution. Every time the Israelis do make an effort towards that (e.g. the Gaza withdrawal)it is interpreted and trumpeted as weakness. Clearly they are trying to have a disproportionate response so that in the future when the local freedom fighter decides to launch primitive missles at schools in Israel the local Palestinian population, government, and police force will stop him or her and say - "NO! We do not wish to suffer the consequences of the reactions of the Israelis." "I like my electricity on thank you." "I have a relative in the hospital, what are you trying to do kill them?" etc.

The Israelis are attempting to create a serious deterrent to Palestinian actions that ultimately do more harm it seems to Palestinians than anyone else. The Palestinians elected themselves, for whatever reasons, a government that is quasi-fascistic and quasic genocidal at its foundation. You can apologize all you like for these Islamic supremacists while focusing your anger on their idealogical counterparts in Israel, but it seems the Israelis were/are more interested in electing leaders who are open to negotiating a solution with the Palestinians. Clearly these Israelis can't help stepping on their own dicks either, but the challenge for them is how do you negotiate with a government whose central identity rests on your elimination? And how do you get them to stop sending missles into your towns and terrorizing your citizens?

 
At 2:21 PM, Blogger pop said...

What else should the Israelis do? They withdrew from Gaza abd are preparing to do so from the West Bank. In the meantime what do they do about daily rockets being launched from Gaza?

Imagine if some small country in the Carribean starting launching scud missiles at US cities. I dont think we would be restrained in our responce. It wouldnt be proportionate. How can you expect anything different from Israel?

 
At 5:58 PM, Blogger ent lord said...

As far as the Dov Weissglass comment, it is not surprising. I have started reading the Jerusalem Post and watching IBA newschannel and the lack of empathy by these spokespeople for the Israelis is striking. Over and over we hear the litany of how Israel is victimized by the Palestinians and how the Palestinians are pathological and prefer death and destruction to peace.
The problem Israel faces is that it intends to remain a Jewish nation, as witnessed by its increasing calls to Jews in the US and Europe to immigrate, in the face of the demographic reality that they are awash in a sea of Arabs.
The Wall is intended to keep the Arabs out (as the old Pale was intended to keep Jews in) and changing citizenship rules make it difficult for Arabs to gain any sort of electoral strength.
My guess is that the Israelis see weakening Syria and Jordan further will make it easier for them to expel the West Bank Arabs when the time comes.

 
At 7:28 PM, Blogger Dan said...

The Israelis are attempting to create a serious deterrent to Palestinian actions that ultimately do more harm it seems to Palestinians than anyone else.

The obvious result of this policy is to cater to the extremists on both sides. What of moderate palestinians who have no say in what a bunch of fanatics do?

This policy treats Palestine as a real nation-state, and Palestinians as a monolithic block. Neither is true. The "government" of Palestine lacks the basic tools for enforcement of order necessary to prevent all such attacks.

It also neglects that the extremists want Israel to punish all of Palestine because it aids their recruiting. Guerrilas don't want their enemies behaving reasonably and reacting proportionally, they want them acting like bad-guys.

Collective punishments are wrong because they punish the innocent, and in fact don't do so as a side-effect, but as a desired effect. It's the whole point of them. That's why its reprehensible. Just War theory allows for civilian casualties in cases where it is an unavoidable side-effect, but not as the desired outcome.

So you have a policy which is morally reprehensible, which you purport serves a larger utilitarian good (disincentive). However even that aspect is wrong, so it is an ineffective, morally repugnant policy.

 
At 8:24 AM, Blogger Peter Attwood said...

The Americans spent 12 years making Iraqi children thinner through the sanctions regime, killing hundreds of thousands of them. Madeleine Albright stated with perfect frankness that their deaths were "worth it."

It surprises you that such people would be happy to meet with Dov Weisglass? There's no daylight between them!

 
At 11:44 AM, Blogger james_speaks said...

What are the Israelis to do?

Really? (Well, the question was posed and therefore I must answer.)

The Israelis might consider adopting the following policies:

1) Stop stealing Palestinian land and water. Do not overpump wells in Gaza, then suddenly call it a Peace Offering when they abandon the now bracksish water.

2) Prosecute settlers who murder Palestinian children with impunity. Decline to give interviews on ABC Nightline which foster the impression that it is the children who provoke murderous settler activity.

3) Return control of the roads in Palestine to Palestinians. Give up the practice of forcing Palestinian women to give birth at checkpoints.

4) Allow all Palestinians to return to their lands. Admit the story that they fled willingly is a lie.

5) Admit that each Palestinian life is as precious as any Israeli life.

Since suggestion number 5 will never be adopted by Israel, it is likely that the Israelis will continue to commit genocide until the world tires of Israel. That day is close at hand.

I, for one, would be sad to see an individual such as Uri Avneri lumped into the mob mindset which is Likud/Kadima, but how many Avneris are there? The overwhelming majority of Israelis either support Israel's racist pogroms outright, or they enjoy the benefits in silence.

To answer the question about when some nation will drag the US or Israel before the Hague, the answer is when the dollar ceases to be the dominant world currency. The process is underway, and the possibility of US President(s) standing before the ICC is closer than one might think. Try to imagine Bush appearing without dragging Olmert along by his collar. I can't.

 
At 2:34 AM, Blogger LawrenceofCyberia said...

"It's like an appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner, but won't die."

Dov Weissglas does not strike me as a reflective person, nor as someone who would be aware of Palestinian culture. But I wonder if one day he might hear the most famous poem of Palestine's national poet, which Palestinians know by heart, and be capable of reflecting on what he said:

Record!
I am an Arab
And my identity card is number fifty thousand
I have eight children
And the ninth is coming after a summer
Will you be angry?

Record!
I am an Arab
Employed with fellow workers at a quarry
I have eight children
I get them bread
Garments and books
from the rocks..
I do not supplicate charity at your doors
Nor do I belittle myself at the footsteps of your chamber
So will you be angry?

Record!
I am an Arab
I have a name without a title
Patient in a country
Where people are enraged
My roots
Were entrenched before the birth of time
And before the opening of the eras
Before the pines, and the olive trees
And before grass grew

My father.. descends form the family of the plow
Not from a privileged class
And my grandfather..was a farmer
Neither well-bred, nor well-born!
Teaches me the pride of the sun
Before teaching me how to read
And my house is like a watchman's hut
Made of branches and cane
Are you satisfied with my status?
I have a name without a title!

Record!
I am an Arab
You have stolen the orchards of my ancestors
And the land which I cultivated
Along with my children
And you left nothing for us
Except for these rocks..
So will the State take them
As it has been said?!

Therefore!
Record on the top of the first page:
I do not hate people
Nor do I encroach
But if I become hungry
The usurper's flesh will be my food
Beware..
Beware..
Of my hunger
And my anger!


- Mahmoud Darwish; "Identity Card".

 

Post a Comment

<< Home