Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Friday, September 15, 2006

Clemons on Bolton

Steve Clemons at the Washington Note predicted two days ago that the Bolton nomination was dead, given Republican Senator Lincoln Chafee's opposition. The Washington Post has come around to the same conclusion.

Bolton is a slippery character who has made all kinds of scurrilous and unsupported charges over the years. He once said, "There is no United Nations." He denied that that US invasion of Iraq, with no United Nations Security Council authorization and no casus belli, violated the UN Charter. Then there is this: the International Atomic Energy Agency has said repeatedly that it cannot find good evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program as opposed to a civilian nuclear energy research program. The IAEA has also said that the situation is not completely transparent. Bolton recently charged that after years of investigation, it still cannot be ruled out that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, implying that therefore it did. But it is much more likely that there is no clandestine program, since IAEA inspections would likely have turned it up by now.

The IAEA has slammed an error-riddled report written by a Bolton associate for the Republicans in Congress that made false allegations about Iran's program.

Informed Comment called the report "riddled with errors" when it first came out.

5 Comments:

At 2:21 AM, Blogger Stone Balzac said...

I don't think you should refer to yourself in the the 3rd person until Informed Comment is either a team or a branded name.

 
At 4:27 AM, Blogger Spin proof said...

The US should be playing down the threat from Iran, not up.

The Iranians rightly think that an attack on them will be determined by military factors, not some legal justification.

There is in fact a real danger that Iran might do its own pre-emptive attack, deciding it would be attacked no matter what.

The Fifth Fleet in the Gulf and the giant bases in Qatar and Kuwait are sitting ducks and the little Iraanian president has his own hallucinations about Armageddon and the return of a savior.

The neo-cons/Likudists have also destroyed the ability of the Army to respond to a new war, with aparently zero battle-ready troops not already deployed.

 
At 9:13 AM, Blogger John Koch said...

One can follow the Hoekstra - IAEA dispute via AP or Reuters articles on the WWW, but only with great difficulty in the print media. I cannot vouch for TV at all.

In August, the WAPO gave front page attention to Hoekstra's House Intelligence Committee report allegation of the UN's IAEA neglect to detect Iranian nuclear weapons development. Yesterday's IAEA rebuttal appeared way back on page A17. The NYT published a letter by Michigan Congressman Mike Rogers defending the Committee's warning on Iran. No mention of the IAEA rebuttal seems to appear in the print versions of either the NYT or the WSJ.

The MSM media seems to corroborate Bolton: the UN does not exist.

Some time in the next few months the WSJ may publish a series of articles by its recently acquired expert, Judy Miller, to expand on the IAEA's failings and fill in the holes with compelling accounts ot Iranian WMD and connections to the next 9/11.

 
At 11:45 AM, Blogger ent lord said...

Bolton is another example of an official who sees the world through the prism of the United States and Israel as the dominant countries in the universe.
This was striking yesterday as I watched Condie Rice on IBA television. She stated what hoops each Muslim group/country had to jump through before we would allow them to breathe.
Iran: would have to immediately cease all attempts to refine uranium and halt its nuclear development program. In addition, this must be transparent to the US so we get to inspect their nuclear and military installations ourselves to be sure.
Hizbullah: must admit Israel has a right to exist and must cease all violence and disarm immediately as well as releasing 2 IDF troops.
Syria: no mention of Syria so they must have gotten a pass this time for saving our embassy.
Hamas/PA: must release IDF trooper immediately, acknowledge Israel's right to exist, cease all terrorist activity and violence, and disarm. (no mention if Hamas will be held responsible for acts by splinter or dissident groups)
Israel: has to do nothing since Israel is the victim of Hamas, Hizbullah and Iran. If Hamas or Hizbullah or Iran destroys Israel, then US citizens will be attacked in our beds without warning.
She then smiled and said that the rest of the world supports these goals and that these conditions are nonnegotiable.
Arab TV had a different take on the situation as they listed the countries that have expressed support or sympathy for the Arabs or else have criticized the US. Most recent example is the EU criticism of US attempts to sabotage the Hamas/Abbas coalition government.
Watching Condie, I realized that she is living in her own fantasy world. The problem is that her fantasy is a nightmare for the rest of us.

 
At 2:03 PM, Blogger copy editor said...

I'm starting to think there is no NATO

 

Post a Comment

<< Home