Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, January 28, 2007

7 US Troops Killed
Bombing kills 13 in Baghdad, 40 Bodies Found
Massive Anti-War Protest on Mall in DC


It was announced Saturday that 7 US soldiers have been killed by guerrillas deploying roadside bombs in the past 3 days.

I cannot see any sign in this Reuters roundup of violence in Iraq on Saturday that guerrillas in Baghdad are lying low or relocating in expectation of the arrival of further US troops.

Police gathered the usual macabre harvest of 40 tortured bodies in the capital. Guerrillas cheekily fired rockets into the Green Zone, the US HQ in Iraq. They detonated car bombs in one neighborhood, killing 13 and wounding 43. Guerrillas dressed as special police commandos kidnapped 8 persons from a computer store downtown. In Diyala province, guerrillas attempting to elude US troops were bombed to death by the US from the air. In Ramadi, a member of the Iraqi National Congress, a secular party headed by Ahmad Chalabi, was kidnapped and killed.

In the US, tens of thousands of protesters gathered at the Mall in a major rally against the Iraq War.

That event was not the only reminder of the Vietnam era. Senator John Warner, a former secretary of the Navy, remembers with regret not having spoken out more forcefully during the Vietnam War, when the generals kept coming and saying they just needed another increas of 10,000 troops to win this thing.

Iraq much more than Vietnam can only be settled through political negotiation, as Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi told Iraqi PM Nuri al-Maliki on Friday. It is unlikely that the extra troops the US has available could prevail in the sense of bringing order to the country or even just the capital (see the opening paragraph for what such order does not look like).

Tehran is trying to control the flow of thousands of Shiite pilgrims into Iraq for the commemoration on Tuesday of the martyrdom of al-Husayn, the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad. Husayn's tomb is at Karbala in Iraq, a holy site for Iran's some 62 million Shiites. My advice to the US military is not to try to kill or capture these thousands of Iranian pilgrims even if some of them may be spies--whatever Bush says. Shiites are touchy during Muharram, especially about infidels killing or capturing them in their own holy land, where they don't think the infidels have any business being in the first place.

The US is building an alliance with 50 tribal sheikhs in Ramadi. The US military reports good results in the sense that entire neighborhoods controlled by Sunni militants are now rare. But the radical Salafis clearly still have a presence in the city, and tribal sheikhs are notoriously factional and fickle. I'd say that is a check that may well bounce. The larger problem is that people in Ramadi just don't want US troops there, and don't want Shiite or Kurdish troops there, either. To the extent that the sheikhs are successful in authorizing and allowing the recruitment of local police, that might be a real achievement. On this one, I'm from Missouri (i.e., "show me!").

The Bush administation upbraided Japanese Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma who called Bush's war on Iraq on the basis of its possession of WMD a "mistake". Isn't that just common knowledge? Why protest such an obvious statement? The new Abe government is rapidly slipping in the polls at home, and is presumably more afraid of the Japanese public than it is of Bush, who owes the Japanese a lot of money. A big majority of Japanese in polls opposed the extension of the Japanese Self Defense Forces mission in Samawa, Iraq, which was therefore withdrawn. Bush has fewer friends abroad with every passing day. Aznar of Spain, Berlusconi of Italy, Koizumi in Japan-- who used to run interference for him-- are all gone.

10 Comments:

At 6:58 AM, Blogger Spin proof said...

It is useful to categorize the violence into: 1) hit and run; and 2) hit and stay.

The first will continue, and may even increase as anti-Americans are drawn in.

However, the second which includes the occupation of homes; mosques; and entire districts, can be eliminated by having enough police and soldiers. That has already started. The hoppe is to reverse the current situation of the police being in fear of the outlaws. Once the authority of the state is established, with armor which the outlaws lack, then services and normalcy can resume, despite the worry about the occasional bombing.

The return of refugees is critical, not just for humanitarian reasons, and that can happen rather quickly.

The presence of US troops will have a negative impact after authority is established, if not right from the start. Gen Petraeus, who is a notorious imperialist and American Exceptionalist, will quickly clash with the government too.

 
At 9:26 AM, Blogger SandSkeptic said...

Colin Had It Wrong

The "Pottery Barn Analogy" is generally misinterpreted: "If you break it, you own it," refers only to the item broken, not to the entire shop. If you break something, it does not give you the right to take over the entire shop, bring in more of your family, and kill the proprietor, his employees, and other customers. You are generally expected to make prompt payment for the item, evince embarrassment, and leave the shop promptly before causing more damage. This is what W. should have done in 2003 or 2004 at the latest.

Odom Has It Right

Gen. Odom's testimony has it right--the US must leave Iraq before any substantial improvement in our strategic situation is possible. This should be done sooner rather than later, and should be done voluntarily, because it is the correct thing to do, not under duress or color of defeat. The US has not been defeated militarily--yet. We are just paying a huge, unnecessary, and growing price.

Can the Congressional Lilliputians Get the Lines on GullibWer Quickly Enough?

The real race is between the death of a thousand investigations that will increasingly hamper W., and the outrageous war-mongering alarums he and Olmert and the other little "wolf-"criers will be ginning up in coming months, that will raise the bogey-man of Imperial Iran on a rampage. "Facts" will be treated more cavalierly than in the past, as the stakes grow higher--maybe higher than in mid-2001, when W's nadir got the boost of a century from ObL and his Flying Saudi Circus. When and how the trend lines may cross remains to be seen. Prepare to be scared, but don't be.

 
At 10:44 AM, Blogger reuben said...

I've been reading IC on and off almost since its inception. I've posted a few comments, struggling to post rather than scream them, sometimes succeeding, sometimes scream-posting.

Inspired by current events, and by IC and other sites (democracynow.org comes quickly to mind), I've finally started my own blog.

http://crawfordcandiru.blogspot.com/

I'm not an expert in history or anything else except feeling outrage, but in these evil days of empire maybe that's the most needed expertise of all.

So there it is.

Thanks for the inspiring example Professor Cole!

 
At 11:22 AM, Blogger The Buffalo In The Midst said...

Professor Cole States:
"In the US, tens of thousands of protesters gathered at the Mall in a major rally against the Iraq War."


Please don't semantically underestimate the crowds.

The police reported it that way as always, but the math for calculating crowd density has been dramatically improved and digitized in the years between the 60s and now.

By now, any News organization's helicopter ought to be able to derive a spot-on estimate within... an hour... and they did.

No need for the alway highly suspect "police estimates" anymore

According to UFPJ, it was 400,000.

Almost a half million.

It sounds much different than "tens of thousands" when put that way.

We'll have an easy time levitating the Pentagon on March 17 with that kind of crowd.

Then we can split up.

Half visit the Democratic Convention, the others visit what's left of the Republican machine at their convention.

Sort of like the Battle of Little Big Horn with the US governmment as Custer.

I wouldn't want to suggest it, what with massive improvements in suppressive laws since the Martin Luther King Civil Rights/1968 Anti-Riot Act, but perhaps America is going to "bring the war home" to their elected official next year if they don't cease and desist from their nasty little war immediately.

However, I will suggest that everyone visit their elected official when they come home for reccess, and if they in ANY way continue supporting this madness, don't leave.

 
At 11:27 AM, Blogger michael said...

I see that the Washington Post has seen fit to give space to Dinesh D'Souza to peddle once again his ignorance and hatred. I wonder, has the Post ever seen fit to give Prof. Cole space in its pages? If so, how often? How is that a right wing hack pamphleteer like D'Souza gets a column so he can cry a river about how people mock him for his ridiculous propagandizing? Why do people who have been consistently, 100% wrong like Jonah Goldberg, get columns in the LA Times? Must be that damn Vast Left-wing Media Conspiracy at work again.

 
At 12:20 PM, Blogger reuben said...

Al Jazeera reports on the appointment of Israel's first ever Muslim cabinet member. It's Labour MK Galeb Magadla.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/
00102C60-ECC5-427B-A8AC-55A25B57AACB.htm

Maybe Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) was right when he said, "...if American citizens don’t wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office..."

http://www.c-ville.com/index.php?cat
=141404064431134&ShowArticle_ID=
11041812060944420

See what happens when 20% of your population is Muslim? It might take half a century, but eventually one gets into a cabinet. Next thing he'll be asking for a portfolio.

 
At 2:48 PM, Blogger cognitorex said...

Who Actually Kills Who in Iraq?
What are the statistics for dead troops and dead Iraqis?
If February is expected to bring, say, 200 dead troops and 3,000 dead civilians, then how many will be killed by what Iraqi participants?
Better yet, break it down by province. How many deaths from Sunni insurgents? How many from criminal elements? How many from foreign fighters/terrorists? How many from Shiite insurgents or death squads.
The Senate had Petraeus on the stand and talked about themselves.
How about some concretish numbers and forecasts and then explain how or why or what a surge is going to change. These numbers must exist on at least an extrapolated or best guess basis.
It would be illuminating to see what groups kill who. It would also decrease a lot of partisan spin, such as it's all foreign terrorists, or the latest spin that it's Iranian agents.
As much as the press, I suppose, is paid to write about who said what about whom, i.e. gossip, a few facts from time to time would be educational.

 
At 2:59 PM, Blogger Arizoniana said...

The problem with reading the Reuters reports and trying to figure out the level of violence is that they are unclear on whether the Shias are killing the Sunnis, or the Sunnis are killing the Shias.

If the stories are true about the Shia militia pulling back, then it might have provided an opening for the Sunnis to escalate. This would please the Shias because it would mean the new American troops would have to start doing what the Shias formerly did against the Sunnis. It would also keep them out of the Shia neighborhoods so they could rest and regroup.

 
At 3:14 PM, Blogger ent lord said...

Listening to Lieberman and others of his persuasion on IBA, it seems to me that the Likud party is getting pushed to the center, perversely enough. The Russian emigres take a much stronger anti-Arab line and have no problem with overt ethnic cleansing.
The bet now is if Israel will launch any sort of airstrike against Iran, if the US doesn't. At one time, it seemed at least some of the Kurds accepted the Israelis as benefactors but in recent days, it seems the Kurds are moving towards some sort of accomodation with Iran.

 
At 4:53 PM, Blogger Charles said...

BBC is reporting a day long battle in Najaf in which 250 "fighters" were killed. :http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6308365.stm

It says they had anti-air as well; a copter is reported crashed with 2 dead.

Surely things can only get exponentially worse until some one's will or resources are spent. The U.S. is going there right now. No one else is going anywhere. What a mess it'll be in 09.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home