Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, March 05, 2007

Coalition Raids Police Intelligence Center;
Al-Maliki Protests Raid as Illegal;
4.5 Million Malnourished Iraqi Kids


British soldiers accompanied by Iraqi forces raided a National Intelligence Center in the southern city of Basra. They said they discovered evidence of torture and accused the police running it of being terrorists involved in setting roadside bombs targetting British convoys.

So to whom exactly did this facility belong? Even al-Zaman does not seem to know, exactly. At one point its article says that the facility belongs to the federal Ministry of the Interior. At another point it says that it was overseen by a multi-party committee. Many police facilities under the Interior Ministry had been infiltrated by the Badr Corps paramilitary of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq. But the Basra provincial council is dominated by the Islamic Virtue Party, which has its own paramilitary, which has been infiltrated into the Basra police. The intelligence center was likely either Badr or Virtue. I suspect the latter, since Badr is highly disciplined and to my knowledge has not attacked Coalition troops frontally.

Now here is what is odd. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki denounced the British raid on the facility! He called for an investigation and called the action illegal. His office accused the British of releasing the prisoners held there (themselves presumably involved in political violence), but the British military said that the prisoners had accidentally escaped.

It would be very interesting to know the back story here, but no one is being explicit about whom exactly, among the various parties and militias in Basra, the British were hitting, or why al-Maliki should protest as a result.

Under US, Kurdish and Sunni Arab pressure, the al-Maliki government appointed an independent, Jawad al-Bulani, to head the ministry of the interior, and he is reported to have purged thousands of employees from it who had ties to militias and death squads. These were primarily members of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, who had been using the ministry as a vehicle for patronage for party members and Badr Corps militiamen. I am suspicious, however, about the depth of this purge and have the sense that SCIRI and Badr still have a large presence in the ministry.

Baghdad police found 20 bodies in the western district of Karkh on Sunday. There were bombings in Hilla, Baquba and the Dura district of Baghdad. Antiwar.com summarizes the violence on Sunday, which left dozens dead.

US troops accompanied by Iraqi forces moved gingerly into the Jamila section of Sadr City on Sunday, doing weapons searches. Tina Susman of the LA Times captures the care with which the operation is being pursued, and the sense of danger given that this vast Shiite slum is a center for the Mahdi Army militia. But it should also be pointed out that the fighting between US troops and Sadr City militiamen in spring of 2004 had a great deal to do with Paul Bremer's sudden and quixotic decision to "kill or capture" young nationalist Shiite cleric Muqtada Al-Sadr, the leader of the militia.

Leila Fadel of McClatchy says the Sadrists are telling her that the Mahdi Army has strict instructions to lie low and not rock the boat during the security sweep. After all, if the US really could root out the Sunni guerrilla movement, the Shiites would be huge winners . . .

Reuters reports that there are 4.5 million undernourished children in Iraq.

9 Comments:

At 4:29 AM, Blogger Christiane said...

Yesterday evening I saw a documentary entitled "Iraq, agony of a nation", by journalist Paul Moreira. It was really disheartening. The report spent a long time interviewing high authorities in the Ministry of interior and also different police chiefs in both in Mossul and in Baghdad. There was a part dealing with the action of the Wolf brigades in Mossul, a Shiites brigade who participated in the offensive against Mossul and who arrested Sunnis, included many innocents and committed tortures against them.
At the end the report deals with the action of the Badr militia inside of the Ministry of interior. The general idea is that they were trained by James Steele, the man who created the death squads in Salvador. Steele is branded as a specialist of counterinsurgency and one of his favorite means of counterinsurgency is killing as many civilians as possible, in order to cut down support for the guerrilla among the population. The reports said that the Americans promoted these criminal counterinsurgency techniques in Iraq, training special brigades of the Badr corp. These brigades then slipped out of control of the US and the Iraqi government.
Paul Moreira is a French investigative journalist, working for different media (the press, the radio and the TV). He has been the producer of 90 minutes an emission dedicated to investigative journalism. He is the author of a book concerning modern censorship, aka the manipulation of the media by the detentors of power, be they in the government or in the big companies.

 
At 5:28 AM, Blogger james_speaks said...

"Reuters reports that there are 4.5 million undernourished children in Iraq."

Paul Wolfowitz, who heads the World Bank, has expressed an interest in solving hunger by morphing dictatorships into democratic institutions. From wikipedia.org which quotes the WSJ, "Mr. Wolfowitz is willing to speak the truth to power. He saw earlier than most, and spoke publicly about, the need for dictators to plan democratic transitions. It is the world's dictators who are the chief causes of world poverty."

This crisis of hunger in Iraq is an ideal opportunity for the distinguished Mr. Wolfowitz to follow through on the planning of a certain Mr. Paul Wolfowitz who, as Rumsfeld's Undersecretary of Defense, planned the invasion and aftermath in Iraq.

This is the perfect time for Wolfowitz to once again put our money where his mouth is.

 
At 8:44 AM, Blogger The Great Salami said...

What appears to most to be an attempt to bring 'security' to Baghdad seems more from an average Shia street thug's point of view to be an attempt to humiliate the Sadrists and make them appear weaker in the the eyes of those that might otherwise support them.
So easily we forget the thousands and thousands that the Sadrists were able to turn out to demand elections in 2004 that Bush had to cave in and agree to elections.

The neo-con dream of a Israeli/US client state on the border of Iran died when the Sadrists did right by their people.

Shia power in Iraq is right and natural. They are the majority and deserve to rule as a majority.
Should Serbs be ruled by Kosovars?
Should Catalans be ruled by Basque's.
Should Scots rule over the English (as it seems they do now!).

The simple fact is that the imperial effort to create at least a state that can be influenced by the forces that weild power in the west is focused entirely on demonising Shia legitimate representation and genuine democratic effort to keep the freedoms that liberation from Saddam gave to the Shia people of Iraq.

Just because this does not now suit the short term imperial ambitions of the morose and ending regime of cronyist and ineffective administration is no reason to destroy any chance of unity or peace in Iraq.

As things stand, it is more likely that Iraq will end not like Vietnam but like Cambiodia where those not aligned with (Angker) the current way, are simply reased out of existence, and the confessionally based deciding factor will draw in nations from all over the world, wasting yet more lives and treasure, strenghtening not weakening those who would be the enemies of democracy.
This is the legacy of Bush, and Cheney and Dungeon Master Rumsfeld.

For heavens sake, there are real lives involved. And those who worry about are missing the point. The oil will flow one way or the other; but why should blood be mixed in?

 
At 9:42 AM, Blogger Jeff said...

This isn't the first time. The British have conducted similar operations. Remember when the Iraqis had those two soldiers that they said were captured conducting false flag operations?

That the prisoners escaped makes this extremely suspicious. It makes you think there was somebody in that jail that they wanted to escape, and they wanted it badly enough to allow all the other prisoners to escape, too.

God, this is a dirty war.

 
At 10:27 AM, Blogger SandSkeptic said...

British-Iraqi Humor Competition

British humor is usually so deliciously understated, as when the British spokesman claimed the prisoners held at an "Iraqi National Intelligence Center" in Basra raided by the British "had accidentally escaped."

Apparently the British believe their entry was misclassified, and should have been entered under "slapstick."

The Iraqis themselves are no slouches in the understatement department, as exemplified by the deadpan delivery of PM Maliki's "protest," spoken as if anyone were even paying attention.

Cards in the Iraqi MOD are considering whether to top that one by forcibly expelling the British from Basra and overseeing petroleum thefts themselves.

 
At 10:46 AM, Blogger SandSkeptic said...

Why Didn't They Try That Years Ago?

So, all it takes to conduct a peaceful search of an Iraqi home is a quiet knock on the door and a few polite phrases in Arabic? Couldn't we have done this from the beginning?

How long will it take to search the "slum dwellings" of a million Sadr City residents?

Since SC residents aren't the problem ones killing US soldiers, why are our troops spending any time on this?

And yes, if the US could root out the Sunni guerrillas, the Shiites would be way ahead. But that is just what the US military has apparently been unable to do for lo these past four years, now in'it?

Just how is the US military going to root out Sunni guerrillas by looking in Shiite neighborhoods?

Is this the "new strategy" or more a "new approach?" Does Gen. Putreaous approve? Does this go all the way up to P.P. himself? What do W., Condi, and Karl think about this? How about Snow Job?

After clearing Sadr City, can the troops go search Kurdistan? Or will they be needed in Kandahar to not search Waziristan?

 
At 12:21 PM, Blogger JHM said...

Talk about "odd"!

Poor M. al-Malikí may flabbergast the Faculty Club at times, but his attitude makes excellent sense considered as primary politics rather than as tertiary educationalism.

"Who's ultimately in charge down at Basra?", the quasiminister and chair of the quasiministerial quasicouncil asks, "Does not our own ever-precious Khalilzád Konstitution itself say that I'm supposed to be in charge, even way down at Basra? So, then, is it 'odd' that I should resent the Brits usurping?"
==

The Brits themselves appear to be worldy-wise enough to cope -- "said that the prisoners had accidentally escaped" -- but on the other hand, the juxtaposed rigidities of Crawford and Ann Arbour?

One begs pardon of God.

 
At 1:26 PM, Blogger Great Idea said...

Al-Maliki sure is very "wishy-washy"... he needs to take a hardline ALL the time.
Best,
Dan

Iraq’s Inconvenient Truth

 
At 1:42 AM, Blogger larkrise said...

What has been notoriously lacking throughout this Bush Boondoggle of a war, is media coverage of the terrible suffering of the Iraqi people. Now and then, we see or hear a small blurb about death tolls or civilians being killed. There are the daily body counts, that are numbers on a paper. On the television and in local newspapers, photos are few and far between. We were kept in the dark about Fallujah; and how that city was devastated and how many actually died there. There must be refugee camps, but we don't see them on NBC Nightly News. Thousands of Iraqis have perished. Thousands have been maimed. Many, many more have lost their homes and livelihoods. Thus, it should come as no surprise that great numbers of children are malnourished. Prior to the war, sanctions had caused lean circumstances. With the ensuing chaos of war, roadside bombs, and this group fighting that one, food delivery must be extremely difficult, if not impossible. Yet, all we hear about is oil deals, not humanitarian aid. The mainstream media has effectively swept the terrible suffering Bush has caused under the rug. They would rather concentrate on Anna Nicole or Britney. Since the majority of Americans supported the Inferno at one time, I suspect they don't want to be reminded of their folly; and the Media knows it. Still, that is no excuse for turning a blind eye to the destruction this country has wrought upon another country, where life wasnt that easy before all Hell broke loose. Those who wish even less to see the results of this war are the "Compassionate Conservatives." I am sure the 4.5 million undernourished Iraqi children are waiting to see some evidence of that compassion. I know I am.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home