Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, May 07, 2007

8 US Troops Killed;
Major bombing at Shiite Market killes 35;
Boehner Favores Benchmarks


Sunni Arab guerrillas killed nearly 100 persons in Iraq on Sunday in an orgy of civil war violence.

The guerrillas in Iraq killed 8 US troops on Sunday, including 6 blown up by a roadside bomb along with an embedded European journalist. We are not far into May and already 28 US troops have been killed this month, 12 of them over the weekend.

The guerrillas also targeted a Shiite market in Baghdad, using a car bomb to kill 35 and wound 80.

Al-Zaman reports in Arabic that a new round of fighting and declared enmity between the Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr and the Badr Corps of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq has has posed new dangers to security in several locales, including East Baghdad, Diwaniya, Najaf and Basra.

The battle that Reuters reported this way:


' BAGHDAD - The U.S. military said it had killed up to 10 militants and destroyed a torture room during a raid in Baghdad's Sadr City that targeted suspected members of a cell known for smuggling sophisticated bombs from Iran.'


was, according to al-Zaman, actually a fight between the Mahdi Army and the Badr Corps, in which US helicopters intervened on the side of Badr. Al-Zaman's sources maintain that the Badr Corps is systematically targetting the Mahdi Army, and incarcerating its leaders along with others, breaking down front doors and going into houses where they feel it necessary. It says that residents of the Baghdad neighborhood where their latest clashes took place are disgusted with the behavior of the Badr Corps. It says that US troops incarcerated dozens of Mahdi Army militiamen in Diwaniya and other cities.

Reuters details some of the other deaths. Police found 24 bodies in Baghdad, an alarming number and a sign that sectarian shootings are rising again. Other major action:

' SAMARRA - A suicide car bomber killed 12 police officers and wounded another 11 after detonating himself at a police headquarters in the city of Samarra, the U.S. military said. Two U.S. soldiers were wounded after an ensuing gunbattle. Samarra's police commander was among the killed, deputy governor of Salahaddin, Abdullah Jubara, said. . .

BAGHDAD - A car bomb killed two people and wounded 10 others in the Mansour district of western Baghdad, police said.

GARMA - Police said they found the bodies of three policemen, shot and tortured, in the town of Garma, near Falluja, 50 km (35 miles) west of Baghdad. . . . '


Aljazeera has been banned from the Iranian parliament building for allegedly insulting Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani.

Not only is Republican congressman from Ohio, John Boehner, leaning toward setting benchmarks for progress in Iraq-- this approach seems to have been endorsed by Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, as well. The point is that benchmarks for progress imply that a policy can succeed or fail, unlike Bush's policy in Iraq. For Bush, there are only two settings, "slow progress" and "progress." 300 hundred people slaughtered in a single day? That's "slow progress." Since there are only these two settings, there is never any reason to change policy, since whatever happens yields "progress," even if it "isn't as fast as we would like." That things have for four years been spiralling down into the Night of the Living Dead is precluded by BushRove's rhetorical strategy, which is almost never challenged by the press. But benchmarks? Then you could get "no progress" or even "things are getting worse." And the further implication is that there is going to be a plan B. The Republicans in Congress have two choices at this point. Let Capt. Bush take them down to Davy Jones' locker in 08, or work with the Dems on a plan B.

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 10:00 AM, Blogger William Glad said...

"The battle that Reuters reported this way: 'BAGHDAD - The U.S. military said it had killed up to 10 militants and destroyed a torture room during a raid in Baghdad's Sadr City that targeted suspected members of a cell known for smuggling sophisticated bombs from Iran,' was, according to al-Zaman, actually a fight between the Mahdi Army and the Badr Corps, in which US helicopters intervened on the side of Badr."

Can you imagine how confusing the civil war in Iraq is to the average American like me? Obviously, you don't call in helicopter support as though you're ordering a taxi. It might help if our government would drop the fiction of "The Government of Iraq" and tell us which groups we're actually aligned with and what they stand for.

 
At 10:39 AM, Anonymous Duncan Kinder said...

The guerrillas in Iraq killed 8 US troops on Sunday

The correct term is not "troops" but "soldiers."

I am not merely being pedantic. The term "troop" has become so politicized that it is interfering with rational consideration of what US defense and foreign policy ought to be.

 
At 10:46 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The policy in the Middle East dates back to the early days of American diplomacy. The more we know about the history of the diplomancy the better we may understand the way towards peace...

Geoffrey Kemp, director of Regional Strategic Programs at the Nixon Center, was a Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace where he served as Director of the Middle East Arms Control Project. With Iran moving into the nuclear age and with the conflict in Iraq, the insights of Kemp are critical to our understanding of security issues in the Middle East. His most recent publication is "Stopping the Iranian Bomb", which appeared in the Summer 2003 edition of The National Interest.

I encourage you to join the discussion on the issues affecting this vital economic and political region. Never before has the dialogue been as salient to the global economy. Chautauqua is a unique venue to hear from Vali and others as Chautauqua sponsors this Middle East forum.

The events happen July 22nd - July 28th.

For more information you can check the web site. www.ciweb.org.

This is not spam this is an invitation to hear from leading scholars on a very important set of issues.

 
At 8:17 PM, Blogger ABHINAV AIMA said...

The clashes between the Badr Corps and the Jaish Mahdi are inevitable in the local power struggle, and it is no surprise that the US is backing one against the other... There are also reports that the US is trying to back 'moderates' among the Jaish Mahdi - so the idea is to rupture the Shiite militias from within and without...

And if a lot of Iraqis get killed in the process - well, shiite...

The LA Times is reporting that the last brigade of the surge is on its way - which means that a favorite excuse for the fallout of the surge will soon be obsolete (that all the troops are not there yet)...

It should also be noted that the actual number of US fighting forces in Iraq are close to 200,000, due to the 40,000 to 50,000 odd mercenaries acting on contract with various governmental and private companies... When Iraqi get killed or otherwise shot at by Ummrikkan-looking gun-toting people they make no distinction in aiming their anger at the US troops in general...

Maj. Gen. Lynch has already forecast, from Baghdad, that he expects higher casualties - and this is a stark truth about COIN ops: the more troops you throw into combat, the higher the casualties... It will be interesting to see how the media and politicians spin this surge-related acceleration of casualties - the Bushiites have already played the "things getting worse is a sign that things are getting better" card...

I invite your comments on my blog.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home