Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, June 04, 2007

The Lobby: No Mosques Allowed in America

A recent joint poll by Americans for Peace Now and the Arab American Institute [pdf] shows remarkable convergence in the views of a weighted sample of Jewish Americans and Arab Americans on Arab-Israeli peace. In contrast to the mainstream American Jewish community, which has fought tirelessly for justice and tolerance in the US, a small group of fanatics has made a different impression.

Karin Friedman details a conspiracy by rightwing Zionist groups in Boston to prevent the city's Muslims from worshipping freely at their own mosque. This article is especially good on the "David Project," among the ideologically more dangerous hate groups in the US. Friedman writes,


' Many celebrated the construction of New England's largest mosque as proof of "the Muslim community coming into its own." Yet not everyone celebrated. In 2004, the City of Boston was sued for selling the land to Muslims. Racist commentators whipped up public hysteria against the mosque.

"Muslims are very upset," said Mushtaque Mirza, who has lived in Boston for 30 years. "The mosque is always depicted as [supporting] terrorism." . . .

When in 2005, mosque directors Dr. Yousef Abou Allaban and Ossama Kandil sued Fox News and the Boston Herald for defamation, analysis of discovery materials exposed a professionally coordinated network of pro-Israel organizations, mass media, Islamophobic academics, and real estate developers. The directors accused a growing list of defendants, including Steven Emerson, the David Project, and Citizens for Peace and Tolerance (CPT), whose president is Dennis Hale, of "a concerted, well-coordinated effort to deprive ... members of the Boston Muslim community of their basic right of free association and the free exercise of their religion."


Islamophobia or Anti-Muslimism may be the biggest moral challenge to American values of tolerance and respect for the rights of all in the 21st century. And, insofar as American Muslims tend to be endogamous (practice in-marriage), they over time increasingly will form an ethnic group, so that hatred of them is not just religious bigotry but also racism (i.e., when acted upon, illegal in US law.)

I have said it before, and I will say it again. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Members of the American Jewish community who think it is entertaining to spread hatred against another minority will eventually discover that the habits of hatred are hard to uproot and know no ethnic boundaries.

7 Comments:

At 2:14 PM, Blogger Mister Suss said...

I'm not sure it's the biggest moral challenge we'll face in the 21st century (the broader questions of immigration and continuing American racism against all nonwhites take that cake in my view) but Islamophobia is a gigantic problem. The more people speaking out against it, the better. So thanks for this post, and this blog in general, Professor. It's nice to know that someone who actually knows what he's talking about has a growing platform. Hopefully someday you and people like you will replace the Lou Dobbses and Brit Humes of the mainstream discourse.

 
At 2:23 PM, Anonymous Frank said...

I do not dispute the main point of the article. However I found the article quoted to be a little disturbing and as a consequence its hard to take everything it says seriously.

"Jacobs' pro-Israel advocacy organization spearheaded the campaign to vilify the Islamic Republic of Sudan, and provided huge quantities of lurid, both popular and pseudo-academic material, in which Sudan is described as a "terrorist, genocidal" state engaged in a "holy war."

Sudan is not exactly a paradigm of virtue. Estimates of the dead in Darfur go from 200,000 to 450,000. Reports of atrocities abound. Isn't it appropriate to call that genocide?

 
At 6:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No Sudan is not a paradigm of virtue. Estimates of the dead do range up to 450,000 and reports of atrocities doubtless abound. There is a civil war and all sides appear to be well armed. It is highly probable that western powers are supplying arms, munitions and trainers to those ranged against Sudan's government. Genocide is the crime of exterminating a specific people. The alternative definition is that genocide is the crime of refusing to surrender to forces backed by the US Chamber of Commerce.

 
At 9:55 PM, Blogger Joachim Martillo said...

More death and displacement have taken place in Iraq in 4 years of US occupation than has occurred in 20 years of rebellion in Darfur. By the end of year the toll of US inspired violence in Somalia will probably equal or exceed that of Iraq.

As a consequence, it is hard to take American claims of concern about genocide in Darfur seriously especially when the US government and a large percentage of US citizens have no problems with Zionist genocide in stolen Palestine (pre-1967 Israel) and occupied Palestine (the post-Six Day
War occupied Palestinian territories).

I would like to help Darfurans, but there is no reason to consider either the USA or the AJWS (American Jewish World Service) a useful source of aid.

Darfur is the site of an extremely messy civil war, but unlike in Palestine genocide is not taking place unless we redefine Sherman's March through Georgia as a genocide against white Southerners.

Take a look at http://vfpdissident.blogspot.com/2007/05/darfur-judeocentrism.html for more info.

 
At 10:43 PM, Anonymous Sean said...

Um, yeah, genocide is taking place in Darfur. You know, the U.S. deserves a lot of blame for a lot things. But to say that the violence in Sudan or Somalia has been "inspired" by the Americans is almost as bad as saying that the violence in Iraq is "inspired" solely by al-Qaeda.

Believe it or not, the United States did not invent war, conquest, or exploitation. I'm not trying to excuse all the horrific things our government has been responsible for; it just sometimes sounds like people think the U.S. is behind every single bad thing in the world, and that other countries' governments, militaries, and civilian populations have no free will of their own.

 
At 10:52 PM, Anonymous Sean said...

I wonder if African victims of oppression strapped bombs to their bodies and blew themselves up they'd get more attention from you people (I'm not talking about you, Mr. Cole, but rather people who have posted comments on this blog). You know, an entire continent has gone down the toliet for the last hundred years or so, and yet it gets absolutely no attention by those who claim they care about equality and human rights. Fact is, this same people only care about suffering if the U.S. is somehow behind it. So much for internationalism.

 
At 6:15 PM, Blogger Joachim Martillo said...

We should probably talk about the eternal sunshine of the empty American mind.

The USA was using the Sudan as a cold-war stomping ground in the 60s and 70s.

A lot of Sudan's problems today are directly attributable to very confused and very nasty US policies in the horn of Africa over more than 40 years.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home