House rebuffs Bush on Iraq
Iraq Minorities in Extreme Peril
The House of Representatives again rebuffed Bush on Iraq, voting by a comfortable majority to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq but to keep some there to fight 'al-Qaeda terrorists' in Iraq.
This plan of keeping troops in Iraq to fight "al-Qaeda" seems to me naive. Who is al-Qaeda? If you mean Iraqi Sunnis who have become Salafi Jihadis, then it seems unlikely that the US military can fight them successfully with a smaller force. It is just wishful thinking. If 160,000 US troops cannot do it, a smaller force cannot do it. And, the smaller you make the force, the more the US military becomes a sitting duck for militias and others. Likewise it is no good saying you'll keep troops in Kurdistan. Kurdistan is landlocked, and depends heavily for investment, trade and a route to the rest of the world on Turkey. No way to provision a US base unless the Turks give in and say they will permit its provisioning.
If you leave small expeditionary forces inside Iraq to fight "al-Qaeda," they will likely get massacred at some point, and then you'll be pulled right back into the maelstrom.
Make as many prudent political and military arrangements for Iraq as you still have the ability to make, and then . . . get out.
If you're going to get out, get out.
Patrick Cockburn points out that only 6 of the 18 benchmarks set by Congress are really important to Iraq's security and political development, and that it is on those 6 that absolutely no progress has been made. The 'progress' has been on trivial things.
The al-Maliki government is in as much denial as Bush, bristling and suggestions it hasn't accomplished anything (it hasn't) and pledging to pass pending legislation addressing some of the benchmarks. We'll believe it when we see it.
Kurdish officials are rejecting the new draft petroleum bill, one of the key benchmarks.
(The CIA had already concluded that nothing was likely to be accomplished politically in Iraq any time soon last fall when it briefed the Iraq Study Group.
The BBC reports that Iraq's minorities are facing extreme difficulties, and some a close to extinction.
Reuters reports political violence in Iraq on Thursday. Police found 28 bodies in the streets of Baghdad. The reports include this touching sentence: "SAMAWA - Two children were killed and six wounded by a roadside bomb near a bus station in the southern city of Samawa, police said. . ."
Children. No wonder McClatchy reports that even babies in Iraq are learning to dodge bullets.
Reuters' list of other major incidents:
' BAGHDAD - U.S. soldiers killed at least six Iraqi policemen and seven suspected militants during a dawn raid in east Baghdad on Friday to arrest an Iraqi police lieutenant accused of militant links, the U.S. military said. . .
BAGHDAD - Gunmen killed five Iraqi guards near a gate to the ministry of the interior in central Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - An Iraqi soldier was killed and two others wounded by a roadside bomb targeting their patrol in the east Baghdad neighbourhood of Dora, police said. . .
DOUR - Four Iraqi policemen and two soldiers were killed when gunmen attacked their checkpoint in Dour, a small town near the northern city of Tikrit, police said. . .
MOSUL - One policeman was killed and eight other officers plus a civilian were wounded by a roadside bomb in the restive northern city of Mosul, police said. . .
SAWAYRA - Three bodies bearing signs of torture were recovered from a river near Sawayra. '
McClatchy provides further details, including this one: "From 10 am in the morning till the time of having this report ( 4 pm ) , clashes are taking place at Al-Ameen neighborhood ( east Baghdad) after raids done by the American troops to the area . Eight people killed ( including two local cameramen from Reuters) and 22 others injured ."
PS
Pakistan update at our group blog.
Labels: Iraq


8 Comments:
"U.S. soldiers killed at least six Iraqi policemen and seven suspected militants during a dawn raid in east Baghdad on Friday to arrest an Iraqi police lieutenant accused of militant links, the U.S. military said.
Is there anyone we're not fighting? I agree that plans to pursue al Qaeda in Iraq, continue training Iraqi forces, and provide "force protection" are half-baked. I don't even see how we can maintain an embassy in Iraq. What we need to do in Iraq now is best done by the CIA, Special Ops and air strikes while we turn our attention back to al Qaeda proper. I'm amazed at the lack of anger in this country at the news that al Qaeda has been allowed to regroup while we waste lives and treasure occupying Iraq.
The British top brass practically mutinied about a year ago, forcing Blair to radically reduce the forces to a token presence in Basra airport, with the engines left running to flee at short notice.
My guess is that the US top generals will do the same if they are left at low, suicidal, levels to please AIPAC and the US imperialists. There must be a limit to how much they can take.
Dear Professor Cole
I am much bemused by Mr Bush's insistence that he be allowed more time.
Taking it with the British dissociating themselves from dirty tricks and a few other things that we read about I wonder if there is something really nasty and silly going on.
We are all familiar with the guy who has lost his shirt in the Casino who will bet all he has left on a double or quits last throw of the dice.
I sort of remember Mr Negroponte and Mr Gates as involved in all sorts of strange manipulations of government in Central America.
We read of conspiracies involving Sunni States and Turkey to replace the helpless Maliki with the bloodthirsty CIA asset Allawi.
We also see the very worried Iranians suborning the British Commander in Aghanistan's interpreter and articles in Keyhan the newspaper in Iran trying to stir up trouble in Bahrain to threaten the supply lines and the carrier base.
The problem the US seems to face is that if they overthrow the Maliki government and return to the Wholly Owned Strongman type of democracy that they have Al Sadr getting peeved along with all the organisations with Iranian support and all hell breaks loose all over the Middle East.
Now if I were living in a vacuum and never had to try and coordinate this kind of thing, without word leaking out, I might believe that they could coordinate two simultaneous coup d'etats in Iraq and Iran at the same time to take the sting out of the Iranian reaction.
A bit of vigorous bombing would put paid to any armoured formations who didn't see the light
Supposing there was a Vice President who wasn't troubled by congressional oversight and laws about who can start wars and run black operations, because they don't apply to him, and who had his own covert operatives and intelligence people.
The General in Iraq just needs to have enough fighting troops to hold key points in Baghdad and a few other cities while a new government is installed. He just needs to look the other way while the opposition is liquidated.
The opposition will of course all be members of the Black Hand Gang and will get their just reward.
Problem solved and the oil contracts get signed.
The new friendly government in Teheran invites some US armoured divisions to take part in some joint exercises around the shores of the Caspian Sea and the neighbouring states gladly join in the fun of the Greater Persian Gulf Coprospertiy scheme.
A new Treaty is written covering exploitation of Caspian Resources and the Iranian refineries get refurbished.
I can't think why Tom Clancy hasn't written this book yet.
Dear Professor Cole
Can I draw your attention to M K Bhadrakumar's piece in Asia Times on the price of keeping Pakistan out of SCO.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IG13Df01.html
Fascinating to see the Indians trying to decide who to buy fighter aircraft from.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/IG12Df03.html
I wonder if Iran will be invited to join SCO?
Professor,
An interesting article about Iran's Jews.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2125155,00.html
I would love to hear your take on this.
"Make as many prudent political and military arrangements for Iraq as you still have the ability to make, and then . . . get out."
This is the first time Dr. Cole has implicitly endorsed "Model Communities." I pray this is a watershed moment, and that this community is willing to now commit to the best that can be achieved for the US vis-a-vis Iraq, at this late date.
This is not just another blog. This is the nation's leading blog on what to do in Iraq. It is read daily by the Secretary's Senior Advisor on Iraq.
Between the Iraq Study Group and wishful thinking here, one might think that Saudi Arabia, Syria and Iran have an interest in helping the US succeed in Iraq, and that our withdrawal is somehow predicated on their involvement.
Not so.
We just need to set in motion a mechanism for Iraqis to reclaim their sovereignty, intelligently designed to optimize progress toward local stability, and get out of the way.
Avid Student
.
Senator Russ Feingold : Getting out means getting out
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/7/13/141751/474
As I continue to push my legislation to end funding for the war, I will also tighten it to try to remove any possibility that the President could continue keeping large numbers of US troops in Iraq.
Until we begin significantly reducing our military presence in Iraq and thereby eliminate the perception that we are in Iraq as an occupying force, no political solution will be reached, no multinational effort will advance, and the violence and bloodshed will only continue. And America’s troops will continue to put their lives on the line for a policy that is weakening, not strengthening, our country in the global campaign against al Qaeda.
Leaving behind small expeditionary forces in Iraq is simply political maneuvering and fence-straddling. It is more of the same old smoke and mirrors we have come to expect from most politicians. Not wanting to admit defeat by a complete withdrawal, they have seized upon this genuinely stupid idea to show they havent thrown in the sponge entirely, in other words, they aren't "quitters." It is redolent of the Bush Cowboy Mentality that has gotten us into this disaster in the first place. It reeks of the desire to sacrifice human life upon the alter of political hubris and opportunism. As such, it is despicable; but that seems to be the modus operandi in D.C. these days. Hillary has espoused this approach. This is one more reason I wouldnt vote for the woman for Dog Catcher. If we are worried about Iraq being a breeding ground for terrorists, that concern comes a bit late. It's a done deal. Our best bet is to stop throwing billions down a rat hole in Iraq, and carry out the recommendations to strengthen Homeland Security. Chemical plants, for example, remain poorly guarded. We need to recognize that terrorism is a global problem and work with other countries to combat it. Bush has gone hell-bent-for-leather down the wrong road. We need to get back on track and use our sorely-stretched tax dollars to do it, instead of sacrifincing more lives in poorly conceived boondoggles.
Post a Comment
<< Home