Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Al-Dhari Calls for Dialogue with al-Qaeda;
al-Hakim/ Sadr Pact?

In an interview on Aljazeera on Friday, Shaikh Harith al-Dhari of the Association for Muslims Scholars called on Iraqi tribal fighters to cease attacking "al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia." He said that 90% of al-Qaeda in Iraq was Iraqi Sunnis and that ways should be found to dialogue and reason with them. He decried the willingness of tribal leaders to attack the organization, saying that such infighting only benefitted the Occupiers. Al-Dhari has in the past been highly critical of "al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia" for its strategy of targetting Iraqi civilians it considers collaborators with the Occupation. Al-Dhari may now feel, however, that the pendulum is swinging too far in the other direction, with pro-American Sunnis fighting anti-American Sunnis. He said, "al-Qaeda is of us and we are with it." More on this issue in Arabic at Sawt al-Iraq. Al-Dhari's willingness to see the violent, foreign-inspired group as essentially Iraqi and as a group one could dialogue with is startling and, I think, puts him beyond the pale in mainstream Iraqi politics (he is in Amman, Jordan, and I think there is an arrest warrant out for him.) In spring of 2004, I remember a poll done that showed that 25% of Iraqis admired him, and his were among the highest numbers in the poll. He may still have a following among Sunni Salafis, but he is no longer a national figure.

The news of an agreement between Shiite clerical leaders Abd al-Aziz al-Hakim and Muqtada al-Sadr, whose militias (the Badr Corps and the Mahdi Army, respectively) have been literally sniping at one another, seems to me rather thin on specifics. It mainly seems to be a ceasefire called by leaders who are distant from the street scene and who likely don't actually control a lot of their paramilitary commanders. Two provincial governors belonging to the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq [led by al-Hakim] have been blown up recently, presumably by followers of Muqtada al-Sadr. Whether this rather pro forma ceasefire can hold long seems to me very much up in the air.

LAT has more.

McClatchy reports from late Saturday, "Clashes erupted between Mahdi Army militiamen and Iraqi army in Al Washash area, Iraqi police said. The clashes started on the background of building a separating wall in the area. Two people were injured."

Since a lot of government security forces have been infiltrated by Badr Corps militiamen, this fight was actually probably between Sadrists and Badr security forces. It raises question about the efficacy of the Hakim/Sadr pact. [sorry for the earlier corrupt code mentioning 'Bin Laden.' Typo.)

Ammar al-Hakim, the son of Abdul Aziz, who was running the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI)while his father underwent chemotherapy for cancer in Iran, points to the simple but crucial element of trust among Iraq's political leaders as a prerequisite for any progress on creconciliation. He says that it is currently lacking, and that one group blocks the proposals of another purely out of knee-jerk distrust of members of another sect or ethnicity.

Reuters reports civil war violence in Iraq on Saturday.

Labels:

6 Comments:

At 5:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dhari is concerned about the Iraqi Salafis. They are distinct in many ways, but are implicated in the horrific crimes carried out by al-Qaeda because they give logistics support and volunteers.

The Salafis commit atrocities on their own too, but against Iraqis they see as not adhering to their Taliban-like rules. al-Qaeda are not all that interested in these and some of their leaders are big boozers and druggies.

While there must be some innocent Salafis, the group must be hit very hard for the sake of Iraq. In fact the Salafis are a higher priority to Iraq than al-Qaeda. Dhari can go to hell. How do you reason with people who say they are authorized by God and anyone who opposes them is wrong by definition. Shiia extremists are in exactly the same position, and there are signs that the Americans are expanding the "Awakening" initiative to the south too.

 
At 10:11 AM, Blogger John Koch said...

"Pro American" Iraqi Sunnis? Are there any? It would be curious to read English translations of any of their Arabic communiqués, editorials, or manifestos. Or does being anti-AQI suffice to make them pro American? Could an American stroll unarmed down the streets of any Sunni Triangle "havens" controled by these friendly chieftains? Do any also claim friendship towards Shiite leaders and enjoin them to be nice to Americans too?

 
At 11:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 12:14 PM, Anonymous Don in Memphis said...

In today's blog entry, Cole writes, "since a lot of government security forces have been infiltrated by Badr Corps militiamen, this fight was actually probably between Sadrists and security forces trying to track down Bin Laden."

Bin Laden!? That must be a mistake. Who do you really mean?

 
At 1:02 PM, Anonymous eak said...

According to Understanding Terror Networks by Marc Sageman, the starting ideology of al-Qaeda is Salafism. When Shaikh Harith al-Dhari says 90% of al-Qaeda are Iraqi Sunnis, it seems he is simply using the label "al-Qaeda" to mean insurgent. Perhaps Juan Cole can comment? Is the label "al-Qaeda" being used meaningfully in Iraq?

 
At 7:43 PM, Blogger The Buffalo In The Midst said...

Walls... Riverbend of Baghdad Burning spoke of them just before she fled to Syria with her family:

"Thursday, April 26, 2007

The Great Wall of Segregation...

…Which is the wall the current Iraqi government is building (with the support and guidance of the Americans). It's a wall that is intended to separate and isolate what is now considered the largest 'Sunni' area in Baghdad- let no one say the Americans are not building anything. According to plans the Iraqi puppets and Americans cooked up, it will 'protect' A'adhamiya, a residential/mercantile area that the current Iraqi government and their death squads couldn't empty of Sunnis.

The wall, of course, will protect no one. I sometimes wonder if this is how the concentration camps began in Europe. The Nazi government probably said, "Oh look- we're just going to protect the Jews with this little wall here- it will be difficult for people to get into their special area to hurt them!" And yet, it will also be difficult to get out.

The Wall is the latest effort to further break Iraqi society apart."

In Full

If it pleases the blog's administrator, in the future I will refrain from mentioning another infamous walled... uhmn... 'area'... in Poland, during WWII, and just let the Iraqis speak for themselves about THEIR walls, and the destruction of THEIR heritage and culture.

Oh yes, and there are other socio/cultural/economic effects of "walls" which have been discussed recently in the MSM:

Most of Iraq's budget is apparently being spent on 'blast walls'...

I'll let an Iraqi who manufactures them speak for himself:

"Yassir Jaddu, whose private company is now working on contracts handed out by the US authorities in Iraq, said many contractors had been forced to switch from civil to military contracts because of the precarious security situation.

The bulk of funds allocated to reconstruction, he added, was going towards providing security measures such as blast walls.

“If we measure the money spent on building blast walls you will find that it is more than that spent on fuel, electricity and other services.

“One of our small contracts was to build a wall around a police station in Baghdad. We needed 2,500 concrete pieces. Just imagine how costly that was,” he said.

“Now banks, the courts and even the markets are surrounded by walls, not to speak of military camps and police stations. About 99 percent of Iraq’s budget is going towards building walls."

AFP via Y! News

Why don't we just call it what it is... Genocide instigated, aided, AND abetted by a U.S. invasion and a subsequent regimen of seemingly intentional destabilization of Iraq's society (IMNSHO, absolutely on purpose) with an overweening goal of 'stabilizing' a government friendly to U.S. interests even if it kills ALL of the citizens.

BTW, the Democrats won't help...

This just in... The PR firm of one of Hillary Clinton's media hot rods has just been hired by Blackwater Security to help them 'clean up' up their 'reputation'.

Article @ Atlantic Free Press

The wicked word for the day is:

'Corporatism'

But if you prefer, just call it 'conflict of interest' by our government's leaders, with democracy.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home