US Deploys Pakistani Insurgents against Al-Qaeda
The USG Open Source Center translates an article from an opposition Afghanistan newspaper alleging that Washington it deploying Pakistani tribal levies against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
'USA trying to use Pakistani insurgents against Al-Qa'idah - Afghan paper
Cheragh (Light)
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Document Type: OSC Translated Excerpt
USA trying to use Pakistani insurgents against Al-Qa'idah - Afghan paper
Excerpt from article, "Waziristan, a base for movement of Taleban, Al-Qa'idah", by independent Afghan newspaper Cheragh on 6 December
As insurgents in the Pakistani tribal areas increase their attacks on the Pakistani government, there have been various discussions about the relations between the White House and the extremist groups. In line with this, a number of experts believe that the White House has been secretly provoking these groups to fight Al-Qa'idah. This comes at a time when there have been close relations between Al-Qa'idah and the insurgents in the tribal areas for some time... (ellipses as published)
Waziristan has become a base for the movements of the extremists. Actually, who are these extremists? How are they explained? What are the agreements and disagreements between the extremists and Al-Qa'idah and the Taleban? A more important issue are the relations between the extremist groups and the United States of America.
When the White House attacked Afghanistan in 2001 and occupied this country, it dispersed the Taleban and Al-Qa'idah in the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia. In the second phase, it maintained direct contacts with the senior leaders of this group. Therefore, America has been using Al-Qa'idah as a tool since the symbolic and self-made event on 11 September 2001.
In line with a revealed document, US forces were about to discover the hideout of Usamah Bin-Ladin in 2005, Donald Rumsfeld, the former US secretary of defence, stopped them (US forces) from arresting him.
Everyone knows that Bin-Ladin, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and other Al-Qa'idah leaders manage to continue their ominous lives thanks to direct support from a number of governments. However, there is an issue which should not be forgotten. The strengthening of the Al-Qa'idah which is not part of the US-backed Al-Qa'idah, has caused panic and dissatisfied the new US conservatives. They have expressed their concerns in different ways, in particular at a time when the Taleban have been capturing important parts of Afghanistan and the NATO occupiers have failed to eliminate them. Actually, how can America untie the knot which it tied itself? The Taleban, Al-Qa'idah and the insurgents in the Pakistani tribal areas have more things in common than things that separate them.
A US newspaper has recently revealed a secret US army document, according to which America has been cooperating fully with the leaders of the tribal insurgents in Pakistan under the pretext of fighting Al-Qa'idah.
According to what the New York Times has claimed, America has relations with insurgent groups located in the tribal areas in order to make them fight the Taleban and Al-Qa'idah as part of its measures to improve security in Pakistan.
According to the officials of the Pentagon or the US Secretary of Defence, this cooperation has not been just in the financial field, America is also giving military training to the Pakistani tribes. In view of this, we will face a kind of double-standards in the policies of America in Pakistan. However, America does not have a military presence in Pakistan, but with the revelation of this document, it was specified that a number of US militarists are present in that country to train the Pakistani tribes.
This secret document was revealed at a time when, according to US officials, the Pakistani tribal areas had become a safe haven for Al-Qa'idah and the Taleban, and Al-Qa'idah has been organizing its troops in these regions to carry out terrorist activities in different countries. On the other hand, the Pakistani tribal areas cooperate with the Taleban and Al-Qa'idah. In view of this, what does the financial and military assistance of the USA to the Pakistani tribal areas mean?
This issue becomes more important if we consider the growing tension between the Musharraf administration and the Pakistani tribal areas. The Pakistani security forces have always clashed with these tribes, and the military activities of the Pakistani tribes have been counted as one of the current challenges facing security in Pakistan.
It is necessary to mention two important points regarding the New York Times report:
1. In view of the direct relations between the Taleban, Al-Qa'idah and the insurgents of the Pakistani tribal areas, the financial assistance of America to the tribal groups aimed at suppressing the Taleban is useless. As it was mentioned, we cannot design a specific boundary for the extremist groups within the Indian subcontinent. This process has developed following the collapse of the Taleban. America might be assisting the tribal areas for one reason, and this is the use of its assistance by the Taleban and Al-Qa'idah. The use of Al-Qa'idah and its allies in Iraq as a tool by America shows the huge possibility behind this.
America has been trying to eliminate Al-Qa'idah, which is not supported by Washington. Therefore, it is ready to support the forces within the strongholds of Al-Qa'idah, the Taleban and the Pakistani tribal areas against the extremist groups, which are not acting based on US demands.
2. There is a direct link between the activities of the Taleban in Afghanistan and the movement of insurgents from the Pakistani tribal areas. In line with this, movements in the tribal areas increase to the extent that Taleban activities in Afghanistan increase.
(Passage omitted: Senlis Council's office in Afghanistan was closed because it wanted to legalize poppy cultivation; it claimed in recent report that Taleban fighters are present in more than 50 per cent of Afghanistan)
The USA is only thinking about expanding its own power. Following 9/11, George W Bush has tried to explain the relations between Al-Qa'idah and Washington. Meanwhile, the Islamabad government has become confused, because of the secret relations between the Taleban and Washington.
(Description of Source: Kabul Cheragh (Light) in Dari -- Eight-page independent daily, publishes political, social and cultural articles; critical of the transitional government)

|
3 Comments:
Big news in the Persian Gulf!
The recent Manama Dialogue security conference in Bahrain, hosted by The International Institute for Strategic Studies, was attended by all the Gulf States except Iraq, as well as US military bigwigs Gates, Mullen and Fallon. Some highlights:
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad offered a regional security pact and a 12-point cooperation plan, including free trade and joint investments in oil and gas earlier this week during a summit of Persian Gulf leaders. "We see the presentation of these proposals as a positive development to enhance peace in the region and to ensure stability and security," Bahraini Foreign Minister Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed al-Khalifa told participants at a regional security conference on Friday. "While reiterating Iran's full sovereign right to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes, it is indispensable for Iran to actively and fully cooperate with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)," he said.
In a rare public spat among Gulf Arab countries, Qatar indicated on Saturday that Iraq had not been invited to a regional summit of mainly Sunni Muslim-ruled Gulf states because of Baghdad's treatment of Sunnis. In front of hundreds of delegates at a security summit in Bahrain Iraq's national security adviser, Mowaffaq al-Rubaie, asked Qatar's prime minister why non-Arab Turkey and Shi'ite Iran were invited to last week's Doha Gulf summit, but not Iraq.
Asked at the Manama Dialogue conference whether Israel's nuclear program posed a threat to the region, Gates replied: "No, I do not." The statement was greeted by laughter from a room filled with government officials from Middle Eastern countries.
SedDef Robert Gates went on to spin the recent NIE and to hype the Iran "threat": "Iran still has the capability to restart its weapons program and continues to enrich uranium, an essential part of atomic weapons development . . . There can be little doubt that [Iran's] destabilizing foreign policies are a threat to the interests of the United States, to the interests of every country in the Middle East, and to the interests of all countries within the range of the ballistic missiles Iran is developing".
http://www.iiss.org/whats-new
Iran's neighbors weren't as belligerent: "We want the military factor (of Iran's nuclear programme) to be eliminated," the secretary general of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Abdulrahman al-Attiyah told AFP on Saturday. "What we care for in the GCC is finding solutions that enhance security and stability ... and believe in dialogue as a way to solve the crisis," between the West and Iran . . .We are not for the military confrontation option," said Attiyah.
Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Hamed bin Jassem al-Thani went further, calling on Washington to engage Tehran in dialogue to reach a solution. "Direct talks do not mean agreeing (from the start) with the other party," he told conference delegates on Saturday, among them US Defence Secretary Robert Gates.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071208/wl_mideast_afp/gulfusirannuclearpolitics
Did today's Washington Post report any of this? If you turn to page A27, in an article datelined Manama, Bahrain, most of it did fail to be reported. In true WaPo form there is merely a transcription of Gates's version of the meetings in a "news" piece entitled: "Iran Aims 'To Foment Instability,' Gates Says". The Washington Post can't help itself. In spite of its mea culpas over Iraq it's fomenting a new war with Iran with an article disregarding what really happened in Bahrain and totally focused on US propaganda.
From the USG translation: "When the White House attacked Afghanistan in 2001 and occupied this country, it dispersed the Taleban and Al-Qa'idah in the Indian subcontinent and Central Asia. In the second phase, it maintained direct contacts with the senior leaders of this group. Therefore, America has been using Al-Qa'idah as a tool since the symbolic and self-made event on 11 September 2001."
Right... The U.S. Government is backing almost EVERYONE'S insurgencies in the ME. Even organizations that have goals diametrically opposed to the stated 'needs & goals' of U.S. foreign policy.
Two examples: Recently, Seymour Hersh on Al Qaeda
Historically: "During his stint as NATO Supreme Commander (1997-2000), Wesley Clark was in permanent liaison with the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). Under Wesley Clark's command, NATO directly sponsored a terrorist paramilitary army, with links to Al Qaeda and the trans-Balkan narcotics trade."
That gem is from Project Censored (there's more about AQ, NATO and the West on their site): CIA Double Deals In Macedonia
The PKK and affiliated Kurds (and BushCo WILL abandon them again too... already have.): Professor Cole on the topic
John Robb @ GlobalGuerrillas on the topic: How to bait Turkey Into A Regional War...
What we have going on globally is 'Straw' insurgents: I mean... If we can't make peace with them... sell/give them weapons and money through back channels that destabilize their region, give them enough local social control to allow their group a modicum of western media coverage, and maybe NEXT YEAR (or the year after that...) we can make a boogey-organization out of their actions and cut one of those AC-130 gunships and a DynCorp air crew loose from the Horn of Africa (or the Colombian drug wars) to supress them, an organization we initially allowed to prosper.
Here's one of the (Weapons/Logistics) movers & shakers... Central Asia, Middle East, Africa.
Victor Bout, the Russian Mobster/Former KGB officer whose Bosnian airline 'vanished' 200,000 AK-47s in Iraq which the Pentagon/CPA contracted for shipment to the Iraqi Security Forces: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Bout
All General Petraus had to say about that was essentially... The bookkeeping was bad.
Petraeus blames bookkeeping for missing weapons
Thursday, August 9, 2007
Bookkeeping problems are to blame for the inability to account for nearly 200,000 weapons issued to Iraqi security forces, the top U.S. commander in Iraq said late Tuesday.
In Full @ Stars & Sripes
We deal with the world's 'finest' thugs in the name of some dysfunctional 'democracy'.
Blackwater... Not just killers of 'in-the-way' Iraqi civilians but implicated in the smuggling of CPA Glock pistols to the PKK and onward into the Turkish underworld.
This is one of the secretive parts of Henry Waxman's Blackwater investigantion we may NEVER hear about again.
"Officials in Washington said the smuggling investigation grew from internal Pentagon and State Department inquiries into U.S. weapons that had gone missing in Iraq. Turkish authorities protested to the U.S. in July that they had seized American arms from the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, rebels."
In full @ the WaPo Archive ($$$)
Another take @ McClatchy:
A former Blackwater employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the investigation includes a look at whether Blackwater shipped weapons from its Moyock headquarters to Iraq hidden in pallets wrapped tightly in shrink wrap.
.
.
"In December, the prosecutors obtained guilty pleas from two former Blackwater employees, Kenneth Wayne Cashwell of Virginia Beach, Va., and William Ellsworth "Max" Grumiaux of Clemmons, N.C. The men and their lawyers either refused to comment or did not return calls.
The court files are stingy on details of the crimes..."
"...the federal (Nb. criminal) investigation of Blackwater is proceeding behind closed doors," In Full
It's called feeding the voracious maw of the military industrial complex.
The only major industrial industry left in America.
We need a reality check here people.
FoMoCo sells a few cars...
But the REAL $$$ is in Hydrogen powered military UAVs.
I'll bet you wish they spent those R&D bucks on H-powered Excursion SUVs...
But they won't. Unless the American people DEMAND IT.
That would require Americans to actually DO SOMETHING besides watching '24' on the tell-unh-vision.
It will require MORE than simply voting for the hand-picked (just like Iraq) candidates offered up for U.S. presidency.
Truly unlikely, which leaves us rather permanently 'screwed' into war, and rumors of war...
Bah humbug!
To comment on Don Bacon comment above, the Moderate Arabs + Israel vs Iran, which the Americans are trying to sell so hard, is not only a dead horse, it is just a projected image of one. There is nothing there.
The Gulf Arabs are too busy collecting their trillions in petro-dollars. They see the US and Israel as some kids spitting and throwing things from a high rise building. The stories Gates and Livni tell do not even register.
Iran is actually changing. They have abandoned their noecon version of the (local) super-power forcing everyone at gunpoint. They compare the luxury in the Arab Gulf with the misery in Iran and Iraq instead, and they now want to be a partner, not masters, of the Gulf states.
Post a Comment
<< Home