Walleser Guest Editorial on Imperilled US Allies among the 4 Million Iraqi Refugees
ON MERCY AND REDRESS
Matthew Walleser
There have been over four million Iraqis displaced because of the war and its effects, both inside and outside Iraq. They have fled to destinations that span the far reaches of the globe, from Jordan to Sweden, and many places in between. Some of those who have fled have at some point worked for the United States government in its war efforts. They have been translators and interpreters, who have helped our soldiers and provided or relayed information that no doubt saved many lives. They have been forced to flee because of death threats to themselves and to their families. They have been tortured by insurgents and have also been betrayed by the U.S. government.
In 2006, a former USAID employee, Kirk Johnson, created The List: Project to Resettle Iraqi Allies. The effort now has its own blog and the issue was profiled by George Packer at the New Yorker. Johnson began compiling a list of Iraqi friends and colleagues he had worked with in Iraq. The List has since grown to immense proportions, filled with others who have worked for the government and feel that they have nowhere to turn but to him. The List now is comprised of an enormous ring binder, of which names are added to every day, the result of a constant bombardment of emails and calls for help.
The State Department has pledged to help bring some Iraqis who have worked for the U.S. government to the United States. But these efforts are mired in a bureaucratic system so slow it cannot keep up with itself. The number of refugees that the U.S. has promised to bring in is far, far fewer than those who actually make it to our shores.
It is nothing less than tragic that in the last fiscal year, Sweden has taken in almost ten times as many Iraqi refugees as the United States. Indeed many nations are carrying a burden which they in all honestly cannot afford to carry. An example is Jordan, where hundreds of thousands of Iraqi refugees reside. Mounting prices are taxing the economy and its people, and refugees are having the hardest time of it. Until Iraq becomes stable enough to allow those Iraqis that helped the U.S. return to livable and sustainable conditions, the State Department, and the U.S. government have an obligation and a duty to give them safe haven and asylum within the United States, as well as to look after their wellbeing.
Many say that this is an impossible undertaking. But it has been done before by the United States, and is being done now by Great Britain. In 1996 the United States instituted Operation Pacific Haven, where they airlifted around 6000 Iraqis, mostly Kurds, to the American territory of Guam. It was there that they went through the administrative procedures of being allowed into United States, and most if not all were there by the next year. Now the British have initiated their own “Guam Option,” allowing for up to 1500 Iraqis who have helped them in Iraq to be offered safe haven in Britain, where they will be able to start their lives anew under the government’s aid and supervision.
This is what has to be done by our government in this great time of need for Iraqi refugees which helped out the U.S. and are now at the end of their ropes. They have few options left and few places to turn. The U.S. government has the capacity and the funds to carry out this operation. The only matter left to contemplate is whether it has the compassion to do so. No matter what you think about the war and its discontents, this is not about politics. It is about helping fellow human beings who put their lives on the line and have yet to be repaid in full. It is time for our government to step up to the plate.
Please write your congressional representatives and senators and plead that the US do the right thing here.
Matthew Walleser
Labels: Iraq


13 Comments:
America's "allies" do not suffer more than the other refugees, and generally would have made money from working for the USA.
The refugees problem can only be solved if we accept that they will not return while the secterian government is in power. Iraq's professionals are being openly targetted, and without the full rule of law they have no place in todays Iraq. Sunnis, Christians and other minorities in mixed areas are in the same position.
Once we accept that this is a long-term problem, the solution is very simple: the refugees must be paid their share of the oil revenues, intact since they do no get any of the benefits of the government spending.
The refugees outside Iraq can use this money to live on and invest in businesses etc. contributing to the host nation rather than being a burden, which would make them welcome in Arab countries at least.
The internal refugees can also afford to live reasonably well, and may in fact leave the country now they can afford to.
The Iraqi government actively punishes the refugees, so the international community must force them to meet their obligations rather than play silly charity games.
We owe the Iraqis a great deal, probably more than we could ever pay. One of the many evils of fighting people "over there" is that we do not see the horrific consequences of our actions; and blind to the evils we produce, we mistakenly think we can calculate the incalculable. To my mind, war is impossible to justify, for one because we cannot know whether or not we are producing graver evils than the evil to be eliminated.
I agree wholeheartedly and I am going to make an effort to voice my concern over the refugee crisis to my representative; however, shouldn't it be spelled "whether"?
"No matter what you think about the war and its discontents, this is not about politics."
Nonsense; of course this is about politics and I resent being asked to help when the person asking will not present the politics. Nonetheless, I will help but I have too little respect for the writer who will not explain the politics involved.
What are my politics? We need to leave Iraq, immediately and completely, and offer economic assistance from then. But, we must leave Iraq immediately and completely.
There are my politics; where are the writer's politics? I am not interested in having anything to do with a supporter of occupation, even a charitable occupation supporter.
Let me be gracious and thank the writer, and know that I will act on the essay, but I want us to leave Iraq. Just leave and help after leaving as much as will be politically possible. But, leave leave leave.
Joseph Stiglitz says the same. Leave and help, but leave above all. I am not willing to help if help means staying, though I know how rough that sounds.
Once the pull-out from Basrah was underway the Danish government airlifted all those who had worked for the Danish armed forces together with their families in one night.
Nobody expects the Americans to behave even remotely as honourably.
"It is nothing less than tragic that in the last fiscal year, Sweden has taken in almost ten times as many Iraqi refugees as the United States."
I would substitute "tragic" with "horrifically shameful" - but then, maybe Americans don't feel any shame any more, after destroying the lives of tens of millions of people for no reason other than to control their oil.
I have written or spoken with my Representative and both Senators (well, their staff) on three occasions in the last year. As far as I can tell, they don't give a rat's ass.
How many times should I try before I give up?
Those of us who are not American read this blog from a slightly different perspective. We hear the voices here as (to a small extent) mitigating the brutal foreign policy of your country.
The Senators and Representatives don't care. No surprise. But a few of you do. A few of you are willing to struggle for the truth. A few of you still believe truth has consequences.
Very few. But still...
with respect
"Now the British have initiated their own “Guam Option,” allowing for up to 1500 Iraqis who have helped them in Iraq to be offered safe haven in Britain, where they will be able to start their lives anew under the government’s aid and supervision."
I wouldn't go overboard praising HMG's effort on this, in truth they've dragged their feet at all times and have needed several sharp kicks to get anywhere. The basic policy appears to be to do as little as possible until they give up or die. In this respect the UK is following the US lead, as usual.
See here for more: http://danhardie.wordpress.com/
Nobody expects the Americans to behave even remotely as honourably.
Juan, did you notice that the Fadhil brothers from the absurdly pro-neocon Iraq The Model blog are now living in New York? It seems they have been given 2-year Fulbright Scholarships through the State Dept.
Curiously, they barely mention any of this on their increasingly irrelevant blog.
I was going to use the same word dancewater used-shameful. Another acceptable word is disgraceful. Given the government's behavior and the complacence of too many of my fellow Americans, this is unfortunately not surprising, but it is no less disgraceful, or shameful.
Post a Comment
<< Home