Assassination Attempt on Chalabi;
Baghdad Outraged at Bush Spying on Maliki;
Iraq Seeks F-16s
A suicide bomber attempted to assassinate Ahmad Chalabi on Friday as the politician was returning home to the Mansur district. The bomb killed 6 bodyguards and wounded 17 persons, but missed its main target.
Advisor to the Ministry of Defence, Abdulameer Hasen Abbas was shot as he was driving near Shaab district in eastern Baghdad.
Iraqi officials expressed outrage at the revelation in Bob Woodward's new book that the Bush administration has been spying on Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. Iraqi spokesman Ali Dabbagh warned of future bad relations between Iraq and the CIA if the allegations proved true. Even Kurdish lawmaker Mahmud Osman denounced the spying as a breach of friendship.
Several hundred followers of Muqtada al-Sadr demonstrated against the US occupation in Kufa on Friday afternoon. Meanwhile, a clerical representative of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani called on Iraqis not to let their government off the hook with regard to the promises it had made to deliver basic services. At the Buratha mosque in north Baghdad, Jalal al-Din Saghir of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI) demanded that the minister of electricity be fired and replaced with someone more competent.
The 16,000 US troops in Baghdad could be withdrawn from the capital by next June, allowed Gen. David Petraeus. The security agreement being negotiated between al-Maliki and Bush calls for US troops to withdraw from Iraqi cities to bases outside them by the end of June, 2009.
Over all, US troop levels could decline from 146,000 now to 139,000 by early January, a reduction of 7,000. (In November of 2007 there were 163,000 US troops in Iraq). In summer, 2005, there were 136,000 US troops in Iraq. The number was increased for the elections of Dec.2005, then reduced back to 133,000 in March, 2006. So as Bush goes out of office, there will still be more in early 2009 than there were early in his second term.
The Iraqi government is going on an arms buying spree in the military-industrial Mall of the US. It just inquired about 36 F-16 fighter jets, and is also seeking armored vehicles and helicopter gunships. In recent security operations in Basra and Sadr City, the Iraqi army was dependent on the US for crucial air support, and the al-Maliki government seems to determined to develop its own air capabilities. Likewise, Iraq will spend $11 bn. on weapons such as 140 Abrams tanks.
I have long held that until the Iraqi military can effectively deploy armor and helicopter gunships, it won't be able to act on its own to establish internal order in the country. I notice that in the Maysan campaign al-Maliki launched against the Sadrists in Amara this summer, Iraqi armor appears to have played a role.
Aljazeera English asks, 'Who controls Khanaqin,' examining the conflict between the Iraqi government in Baghdad and the Kurdish Peshmerga paramilitary over control of the eastern, largely Kurdish city in Diyala Province, near Iran.
There was a dispute on Friday between Kurdish and Shiite sources about whether government forces and the Peshmerga paramilitary had reached an agreement on the disputed city.
Rania Abouzeid at Time reports that many Baghdad voters are apathetic about provincial elections, uncertain that they will bring increased services such as electricity and potable water.
Labels: Iraq


8 Comments:
Iraqi officials expressed outrage at the revelation in Bob Woodward's new book that the Bush administration has been spying on Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.
I hardly think Maliki will have been surprised. Eavesdropping under Saddam was a permanent feature. Our telephone in Baghdad was bugged, and we had nothing to do with politics.
That said, if it is true that the US really has all the low-down at its fingertips, how come US policy towards Iraq is so ignorant of what's going on in the country? How come the US was not able to predict that Maliki was going to refuse to sign the SOFA?
Wilful blindness? Or perhaps it is that Woodward's informant was boasting.
In any case, I should think Maliki knows perfectly well that he is being bugged, and takes appropriate measures. The outrage is for show.
Dear Professor Cole
Al Jazeera reports that those awfully nice Pakistani chappies have cut off the fuel supplies to the Nato troops in Afghanistan.
Lines of communications
WaPo has a news feature (link below) profiling hybrid teams of intelligence and special forces assets who are apparently having great success against Al Qaeda in Iraq. Their success will make it much easier for the next president to extricate us from Iraq, because it diminishes the chance that pointless, vicious terrorist attacks will again become a major feature of Iraqi life.
With AQI out of the picture, the only violence will at least have a realizable purpose: Kurds fighting for Kirkuk, rival parties fighting for power, etc. There is at least a chance that these groups can settle their disputes through negotiation after a bit of fighting to establish the relative position of each. Unfortunately for the US, Iran will likely be the major source of support for the winning side, but then that was the geopolitical destiny for Iraq once we made our foolish decision to invade.
Regrettably, the American people have no patience for analysis of the complicated results of their military adventures, and any good news out of Iraq is merely assumed to be bad news for Obama. This good news about AQI is good news for everybody; for Obama it means his plan to withdrawal, which once seemed unduly risky to some, now seems plausible. Indeed, with the recent demands of Iraqi politicians for our exit, it seems unavoidable, unless we were to elect as president, say, a madman fixated on our loss in Vietnam.
ttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/05/AR2008090503933.html?hpid=topnews
ref : “I have long held that until the Iraqi military can effectively deploy armor and helicopter gunships, it won't be able to act on its own to establish internal order in the country.”
personally, i find the idea of a government deploying heavy armor and air power against its own citizens, or some subset thereof of disenfranchised, resident peoples (eg., Palestinians in Gaza) to be a hideous notion...
...and i am certain that you do too, Juan. Let's find another way to word the real 'military force requirements' of IRAQ by first: defining the threat, apparent.
Would that we could wave some magic wand, and revert 'Babylon' back to an entirely benign, de-militarized zone; and the entire Middle East into a nuclear-free oasis ~ god willing a sanctuary ~ rather than this rapidly spreading blight of rubble-ized ruins, "government" in bunkers and ghetto-ized peoples living as if in some nightmare of perpetual desperation behind blast wall divisions imposed upon them by terrified Occupation Forces.
"The Iraqi government is going on an arms buying spree in the military-industrial Mall of the US. It just inquired about 36 F-16 fighter jets..."
...and there probably isn't a SINGLE IRAQI left in-country who has any experience with that type of aircraft.
Vinell is IN DA HOUSE!
So much for US military apparatchik leaving Iraq.
I am sorry to say Prof. that it will be the American taxpayer buying those F-16s. At an average cost of $30 million dollars per machine (Block 30-60) not to mention weapons, spare parts, training and software few nations, even ones with multi-billion dollar surpluses can afford such armaments.
So they ask Congress for a loan (well the State Department does), financed by your taxes directly to the coffers of the defense industry (who get tax cuts in return), who btw, are simply refurbishing machines that they already sold to the USAF a decade or so ago, the Iraqis get some used toys to play with with no real value (no long range missiles, no effective radar and not all the gizmos and smart bombs) and hefty debt for decades to come.
I doubt that the US would sell top of the line tanks to the Iraqis. That would be giving up one of the greatest advantages the US has in Iraq. I mean you never know when the US may have to re-liberate the country.
Dexter Filkins visits the Taliban:
So here was Namdar — Taliban chieftain, enforcer of Islamic law, usurper of the Pakistani government and trainer and facilitator of suicide bombers in Afghanistan — sitting at home, not three miles from Peshawar, untouched by the Pakistani military operation that was supposedly unfolding around us.
What's going on? I asked the warlord. Why aren't they coming for you?
"I cannot lie to you," Namdar said, smiling at last. "The army comes in, and they fire at empty buildings. It is a drama — it is just to entertain."
Entertain whom? I asked.
"America," he said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07pakistan-t.html?ref=magazine&pagewanted=all
I see you've drifted back to your fascination with using tanks and helicopters for fighting an insurgency. :D
Post a Comment
<< Home