Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Thursday, March 05, 2009

Clinton Slams Israel on Jerusalem House Demolitions;
50-Years War Looms with Danger to US

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton slammed Israel on Wednesday for its plan to demolish 88 Palestinian homes in Occupied East Jerusalem, calling it a violation of the Roadmap for Israeli-Palestinian peace. She said after meeting Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, "Clearly this kind of activity is unhelpful and not in keeping with the obligations entered into under the 'road-map'... It is an issue that we intend to raise with the government of Israel and the government at the municipal level in Jerusalem."

Clinton will get lots of critical emails from a tightly organized network of far rightwing Revisionist-Zionists for her comment. Please consider sending her a supportive message for daring speak out on the issue. In fact, urge her to use a stronger word than "unhelpful" the next time. And, other bloggers: Please send your readers to make such comments, as well. The left blogosphere that cares about these things is bigger than the Jabotinskyites, but we don't bother to network or write or contribute specifically on this issue, and so we are always being out-organized and outflanked and marginalized.

The issue of the house demolitions in Jerusalem is important because of its emotional resonance for Palestinians and for the whole Muslim world, which views Jerusalem as Islam's third holiest city, a city Muslims ruled in history for longer than Jews did. Bin Laden repeatedly cited the Israeli occupation of Jerusalem, along with the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, as his motivation for attacking New York.

But in fact the demolition of 88 houses is a minor affair compared to Israel's plans to build 73,000 new houses in the Occupied West Bank, which would lead to a doubling of the Israeli squatter population to 600,000. About a third of the Jewish colonists in the West Bank are Americans. The plan will almost certainly be implemented by the far rightwing government being assembled by Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu. The two-state solution is already dead, but this massive expansion of the squatter population would be the final nail in the coffin. Palestinian statehood is important because currently over half the world's some 9 million Palestinians are stateless,including those in Gaza and the West Bank. Statelessness is a severe disability in the contemporary world, because the state guarantees basic political and civil rights. No stateless Palestinians enjoy the basic rights and freedoms granted Americans by the US Bill of Rights, because their occupiers or hosts will not grant them and the Palestinians have no state representation of their own. (The Palestine Authority is essentially an extension of the Israeli occupation authority and lacks the prerogatives and sovereignty of a state). There are not two sides to this issue, whereby someone could argue that Palestinians don't deserve citizenship in a state and it is good for them to be expropriated at will. It is a scandal and a crime that they remain stateless after all these decades. And, no, it is not the "Arabs" fault. The "Arabs" did not expel the Palestinians from their homes, and since Israel kept the Occupied Territories after 1967, they are its responsibility, not Morocco's.

Clinton has told CNN, "The two-state solution is the inevitable, inescapable outcome of any effort," Clinton told CNN. "It is hard to imagine what other positive outcome could be arrived at." But Clinton has been so cautious in her statements while in Israel, neglecting to press the Israelis publicly and forcefully on their extensive colonization plans, that Palestinians are despairing of genuine progress. They are calling her "Condi Clinton." That seems harsh, given that Condi would almost certainly not have chided the Israelis publicly over house demolitions in Jerusalem.

Hillary is right and wrong. A two-state solution is no longer feasible. It was the best hope for peace, but Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon killed it, with some help from Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc. There will not be a positive outcome in the Mideast. We are in for a fifty-years war, which Israel is very likely to lose in the long run, and during the course of which there will be enormous violence and terrorism, including, probably, further attacks on the United States for its knee-jerk support of Israeli expansionism and aggressive total wars on Arab civilian populations.

Since,apparently, the US government is primed to let John Yoo rewrite the US constitution whenever a few bombs go off, so that freedom of speech and the press can be abolished and the right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure can be revoked, the Mideast 50-years-war very likely will lead to the destruction of American democracy. The blueprint for that demolition job has long existed and steps toward it were taken under Bush.

Aljazeera English reports on Israel's demolition of Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem and its refusal to grant building permits to Arab families, while building new housing for Jewish families. These policies violate the 1907 Hague Convention and the 1949 Geneva Convention on occupied territories, which forbid the settlement of citizens of the Occupier in the conquered area, and forbid significant alterations in the lifeways of the occupied population. Israel has single-handedly reduced the Geneva Conventions to irrelevancy, since it flouts them and strong-arms the United States into acquiescing in and supporting the flouting.



Aljazeera English notes that while Bill and Hillary Clinton helped open the Gaza Airport in 1998, Hillary did not bother to visit Gaza now that she is secretary of state, and the Israelis have destroyed the airport, turning Gaza into "the world's largest prison," or as a Vatican spokesman put it, a concentration camp.




End/ (Not Continued)

18 Comments:

At 3:44 AM, Blogger cavard said...

Juan,

This is kind of related to your post. Have you read Ali Abunimah's latest article on whether Hillary Clinton sabotaged a Palestinian reconciliation? It was well written. Check it out.

 
At 4:35 AM, Blogger daryoush said...

Ms Clinton says: "It is hard to imagine what other positive outcome could be arrived at."

May be the problem is lack of imagination on her part. The solution to the civil rights of blacks in US was not to have two separate countries.

There are really two option. One the status quo with various band aid measure to calm things down (or heat up as the politics demand).

The second option is to have one country, one man, one vote where rights of every citizen is guaranteed. US constitution has done well in bringing harmony among citizens of various religious persuasions. Why shouldn't it be the foundation of Israel? Shouldn't Ms Clinton be promoting the US constitution as model for future of Israel and may be middle east?

 
At 4:42 AM, Blogger smallrat said...

How could Clinton have "slammed" Israel when we're hoping she'll use stronger words than "unhelpful"? She didn't even bother to visit Gaza although various US/EU pols, and even Blair, have been there recently, and we're meant to email her thanks for this?
The problem with liberals is that we're too easily pleased (bought off?).

 
At 6:52 AM, Anonymous Don said...

Clinton's criticism of 88 homes in East Jerusalem is most welcome. We can only hope that this is a a first step in focusing attention on Israel's decades old stealth-like policy of acquiring land in East Jerusalem by building by building, inch by inch, by purchase or other means. And that policy is at one with its obstinate, relentless, ruthless expansionist policies in the West Bank and Gaza.

 
At 7:17 AM, Anonymous Caldo said...

Excellent post, Mr. Cole. Thanks for trying to mobilize the left toward pushing harder for a more humane outcome.

 
At 8:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

More Americans loose their homes legally while more Israelis build homes illegally... with American money.
That says it all. That's is the State of the Union.

 
At 8:29 AM, Anonymous GetThatMesari said...

OK, I'm not sure if Condi ever specifically criticized demolitions, but she would regularly declare settlement activity "unhelpful", vow to bring the issue up with the Israeli government, and then repeat the whole charade some days/weeks later. (Just like ever other SOS in recent memory.) Maybe criticizing demolitions is a step above criticizing settlements, but I don't see a fundamental change here. (Granted, calling for a opening up of the Gaza border might be a significant step).

 
At 8:48 AM, Blogger Arnold Evans said...

Now that we agree that two states is dead I think it is time to begin thinking about what kind of one state solution we can and should support.

A one state solution is surely preferable to 50 years of war that ends in one state anyway, or to further expulsions of Arabs.

In your opinion, Dr. Cole, could the agreement and protections negotiated for minorities in the case of South Africa be simply transplanted to the Palestine situation or are there special considerations that would additionally have to be taken into account to protect the religious, personal and property rights of all involved religions and ethnic groups?

 
At 9:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"A two-state solution is no longer feasible."

You are right. A two-state solution IS no longer feasible-- if ever it was. It may seem too dismal to contemplate, but at least the statement is realistic. But frankly, from a distance, it always seemed like a bit of mirage.

I think when Hillary speaks of the two-state solution as the as the "inescapable outcome," she is being utterly disingenuous. She undoubtedly has good reasons to keep saluting it, but she certainly knows it won't salute back. As for her chiding the zionists for this or that, what is the worth of a "chide?" Does it really have any effect? Or is it just a pat on the head for the Arab world? Do the Arabs ever resent this kind of petty patronage?

Zionism is a wedge that, from early appearances, will likely be driven deeper by the "change we can want to believe in."

 
At 9:46 AM, Anonymous Josef said...

There's a good chance that your analysis of the Middle East situation is correct. Hillary is a step up from Condi, but that's not saying much. With Israel shifting to the right, the U.S. preoccupied with economic problems, this conflict will fester along until the next act of terrorism leads to another bout of hysteria that may put an end to our civil rights. Even a less-than-genius President like Bush almost succeeded in turning the U.S. into a dictatorship, completely circumventing the words and spirit of the U.S. Constitution. Imagine what a President with a higher I.Q but identical world view as Bush can do.

 
At 11:45 AM, Blogger JHM said...

"We are in for a fifty-years war."

Cheer up. Probably nobody will be able to pay for it and they'll have to call it off.

Happy days.

 
At 12:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OT But Some News From Irak

Kurds Seize Iraq Land Past Borders in Blow to US Pullout Plan

Just north of Mosul, Iraq’s second- biggest city, an ornamental metal gate spans the highway. Beyond it, the sunburst-on-tricolors of the Kurdistan flag proliferate in this region 20 miles ( 32 km ) south of the Kurds’ agreed-to autonomous zone in the country’s far northeast.

Neither Iraqi police nor soldiers venture beyond the gate.

The changed scenery reflects the slow, relentless expansion of Kurdish forces into territory far from their officially sanctioned region. The Kurds say that they are simply recovering land where they lived before the late Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein expelled them during his harsh 24-year rule.

The move is creating potentially explosive tensions in mixed ethnic areas of Kurds, Arabs and other minorities at a time when US forces in Iraq are preparing to withdraw.

 
At 3:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the RSS is not working properly, please ask weblog technicians to take a look at it.
thanks.

 
At 4:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sen Clinton needs to remember that actions speaks louder than words...let wait for her actions...NOT!!!!!!!

 
At 7:12 PM, Blogger InplainviewMonitor said...

Who needs Oslo-2?

Let us admit it, the WB settlements issue makes sense not by itself, but as a part of 2-states pro-Phatah agenda.

Neither Likud/Beitenu nor Hamas have much concern for the settlements issue. For the Israeli hyper-right, this is a done deal, they consider settlements as their unalienable right. For Hamas, this is just a minor issue in their armed resistance agenda.

In the 1990-ies, one could consider Fatah as a viable force for I/P peace, but after the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, it all changed.

Now it appears that Fatah cannot do much on a non-occupied territory like Gaza, beyond direct reach of IDF and Israeli special services.

By promoting something like Oslo process - 2, Clinton just does not say much about her awareness of the actual situation on the ground.

 
At 8:36 PM, Blogger sherm said...

If we judged Israel by its interactions with the Palestinians and its neighbors, rather than nurture it as an essential barricade against another Holocaust ("Never Again"), we might be able to treat that country on its merits - more likely demerits.

The term "Middle East Peace" should be discarded in so far it concerns Israel and the Palestinians. Where is the war? Is the permanent Israeli boot on the Palestinian neck a "war"? Was Jim Crow a war between Southern whites and Southern blacks?

 
At 5:50 PM, Anonymous fatima said...

using the term Unhelpful does not impress me at all. She did not even talk about the demolitions in Israel. I wish she talked about stopping AID to israel until they behaved properly , or threatened the Israeli interests , then may be Israel will listen. So far Im seeing the same Old thing coming from different people . No Change .

 
At 8:58 PM, Anonymous v said...

Keeping in mind that a good portion of what you said was true in this post, it is not the entire story. This once again puts us at odds with the nature of the US government. We must keep in mind that there are interests in this region, and somehow they think Israel serves these interests. It is much deeper than a good campaign, let me just say what I have posted elsewhere -

The key is not necessarily political motivation, but power connectivity. The Zionists are plugging into something that is already connected in the warp and woof of the system, there are people in important positions in the halls of power. The key is who closely resembles the "moneyed and responsible class," because this is who those in power listen to - and what those individuals can do FOR them and or TO them. Whereas it is good to try to influence or copy the methodologies, it is also ridiculous not to recognize the afor mentioned.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home