Taliban Hit 5 Star Hotel, Indian Hostels in Downtown Kabul; 18 Dead, 32 Wounded; Indians Targeted

The Afghan capital was struck by three suicide bombings early Friday morning, beginning at 6:30 am local time. Radio Azadi reports that there were five attackers, who struck in the area near the entrance of the Hotel Safi Landmark. The first bomb damaged the hotel.

Two of these bombings, Aljazeera Arabic says, targeted guest houses for Indian expatriates in Kabul who work for companies or NGOs. The third blast was huge, and the guesthouse was left in rubble, such that there may be bodies still within. As I write, the death toll is estimated at 18, with 32 wounded, and some of the dead are Indians and many of the wounded are. The Aljazeera correspondent says that Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told him that the mission had been to hit the “enemies of Afghanistan from among the foreign Indians.” The Sydney Morning Herald confirms that the Taliban were targeting Indian hostels.

The Taliban have hit the Indian embassy in Kabul twice, once in July 2008, and again in October 2009. Many Taliban have helped train or fought alongside Pakistani militant vigilantes fixated on overthrowing Indian rule of Muslim-majority Kashmir.

India is also a significant provider to Afghanistan of development aid and investment, and so is helping build up the government of Hamid Karzai. Having offered $1.2 billion in reconstruction aid, India is the largest regional donor. There are some 4,000 Indian workers in the country, some of them “security personnel,” according to the US Council on Foreign Relations.

Several prominent Tajik (Persian-speaking Sunni) politicians have long-standing ties to New Delhi because India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW, the equivalent of the CIA) provided aid to the old Northern Alliance at a time when it was under siege in the late 1990s by the Taliban. These Tajiks are die-hard enemies of the Taliban, who had committed massacres against them. The Taliban animus against India thus is multifaceted.

The attack lasted about 4 hours, according to Radio Azadi, with some of the attackers using small arms fire. All five were ultimately killed.

Some observers were surprised that the attack was launched on the commemoration of the birth of the Prophet Muhammad. But many hard line Salafi revivalists, who say they want to go back to the practice of Islam that prevailed among the first generation of the companions of the Prophet, oppose celebration of birthdays in general and of that of the Prophet in particular.

Pollster Matt Dabrowski tweeted from Kabul that he was awakened by the first blast, and could see a smoke column bigger than the downtown indoors market building.

US Navy Lt. Joe Halstead tweeted from Kabul, “Insurgents using Mohammed’s Birthday and attempting to counter progress in Marjah with attack in Kabul today.”

Friday’s attack resembled one in January. Although the Taliban are attempting to project an image of Kabul as having little security and the Karzai government as helpless in the face of their assaults, actually they are just proving that the Afghanistan security forces are pretty good and can fairly easily capture or kill attackers.

The Taliban have lost momentum on two fronts in recent weeks. The CSM estimates that Pakistani authorities have captured 7 of the 15 members of the Quetta Shura, the command council of the Old Taliban of Mullah Omar. American drone strikes killed another major Taliban leader in North Waziristan on Thursday, Muhammad Qari Zafar. He was a mastermind of the attack on the US consulate in the southern Pakistan port of Karachi in 2006.

The other front is Marjah, where Taliban direct attacks are becoming rare as the US military and the Afghanistan National Army establish control of the city of 80,000. Some twenty thousand residents have fled to nearby Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand province. The Taliban are still fighting with roadside bombs, and are likely to go doing so for some time.

In the wake of these two defeats, the Taliban are apparently attempting to destabilize the capital and to punish foreigners working to stand up the new government (in this case India), using the tactics of Sunni radical insurgents in Baghdad. While this tactic can indeed slow state formation, it is just the act of a spoiler and does not lead to any positive political achievements.

End/ (Not Continued)

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Responses | Print |

7 Responses

  1. Hi. Been following your reports for years. Thanks.

    The Google map seems to indicate that, for a 'city of 80,000', Marjah look an awful lot like a large cultivated rural area with scattered houses. It looks far more like a collection of farms than any city I've ever seen. Just wondering if you've looked.

    link to maps.google.com

  2. This is just awful.

    Afghanistan needs respite, please -can we help them to avoid war for just 1 year?

  3. >
    >
    > Rigi was reportedly seized after Iranian warplanes forced a flight from Dubai to Kyrygzstan to land at an Iranian airport.
    >
    > "They [Americans] said they would co-operate with us and will give me military equipment," Rigi said in Farsi in the prerecorded television statement.
    >
    > "They also promised to give us a base along the border with Afghanistan near Iran."
    >
    > He said that US officials met him in Pakistan around March 2009 and had also sought a meeting "after the last major operation we took part in".
    >
    > Jundallah claimed responsibility for an attack in the town of Pisheen in October 2009 that killed 42 people, including seven Revolutionary Guard commanders and several tribal leaders.
    >
    so usa does admit that it spends $ to "destabilize" Iran, but denies
    they helped this particular terrorist outfit
    meanwhile, Pakistan appears to have helped Iran in this case,
    perhaps with info that he was on this particular plane overflying Iran,
    which Iran then scrambled fighter planes to intercept
    so usa denies, and pakistan helps
    very interesting
    so who is a terrorist?

    link to english.aljazeera.net

  4. ref : “While this tactic can indeed slow state formation, it is just the act of a spoiler and does not lead to any positive political achievements. Yes, but one gets the sense that Afghanistan is in a state of Civil War, with foreign NATO-American occupation troops politically and financially supporting a centralized corrupt regime, while seeking to annihilate and financially deprive a competing, de-centralized corrupt regime. Not to be too cynical about it: While all this bang-bang fills our daily media, giving us the idea that "this is the War," and gives the U.S. DOD some delusional raison d'être for being Over There ~ if the Taliban's tactics "do not lead to any positive political achievements," then we could equally say that all this expenditure of Western blood and treasure in Afghanistan "is not leading to any positive military achievement," ie., in the sense that it is doing little, if anything to kill or capture the perpetrators of 9/11, or indeed diminish the cause célèbre of al Qaeda, which was our original purpose for Being There.

  5. "diminish the cause célèbre of al Qaeda…" In this regard, Juan, I believe that historians will write that "the War in Afghanistan" was as much a strange and ultimately tragic diversion for America and her allies as was "the War in IRAQ."

  6. A lot of folks are called Taliban these days, just as the National Liberation Front was Communist. But it turns out that Communism in Vietnam was a vehicle for fighting for independence from the Empire, and so is the Taliban today the Afghan resistance against the Empire.

    It turns out that military victories against the Afghan resistance were not the point; the American pupet regime came unglued and the Americans left Saigon from the rooftop. So I'm not impressed with American military successes.

    But it's hard to see Marjah as a success for the Americans. It's been two weeks taking this little town from an outnumbered force, and the little kids the Americans are killing will turn the tactical victory into a strategic defeat.

    Tom Engelhardt's comparison of the Americans in Afghanistan to the Martians in the War of the Worlds is remarkably APT.

  7. Juan, despite the prominence given to these attacks in the US media, the impression I get from the reports is that the Afghan army/police acquit themselves well in repelling these attacks. I agree 100% with your assessment:

    “While this tactic can indeed slow state formation, it is just the act of a spoiler and does not lead to any positive political achievements.”

Comments are closed.