<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jacoby: US Withdrawal on Schedule; Al-Maliki&#8217;s party has strong showing in Basra; Al-Maliki said Convinced he can retain Prime Ministership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the Middle East, History and Religion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: harmis4</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>harmis4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>Estimated Seat totals based on vote totals listed on IHEC website and a calculation of seat distribution based on Iraqi electoral law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rule of Law - Maliki - 92 Seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;National Movement - Allawi/Hashimi 89 Seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iraq National Alliance - Hakim/Sadr&lt;br /&gt;70 seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kurdistan Alliance - Talabani/Barzani 41 seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Change (mainly Kurdish) - 9 Seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iraqi Accordance - (mainly Sunni) 6 Seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Iraq Unity Coalition - 4 seats from mostly Sunni areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Islamic Union of Kurdistan - 4 seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kurdistan Islamic Group - 2 seats&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Religious Minorities - 8 seats&lt;br /&gt;-----------------------------&lt;br /&gt;Total Seats:  325&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is a small chance that Allawi will overtake Maliki &lt;br /&gt;as the overseas votes are counted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should Maliki keep his lead he will have to (1) form a government with his arch rival Allawi.  or (2) form a largely Shia supported government with Sadr.  or (3)  try to break apart the other coalitions and form a government with the Kurds, small parties, and defectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estimated Seat totals based on vote totals listed on IHEC website and a calculation of seat distribution based on Iraqi electoral law.</p>
<p>Rule of Law &#8211; Maliki &#8211; 92 Seats</p>
<p>National Movement &#8211; Allawi/Hashimi 89 Seats</p>
<p>Iraq National Alliance &#8211; Hakim/Sadr<br />70 seats</p>
<p>Kurdistan Alliance &#8211; Talabani/Barzani 41 seats</p>
<p>Change (mainly Kurdish) &#8211; 9 Seats</p>
<p>Iraqi Accordance &#8211; (mainly Sunni) 6 Seats</p>
<p>Iraq Unity Coalition &#8211; 4 seats from mostly Sunni areas.</p>
<p>Islamic Union of Kurdistan &#8211; 4 seats</p>
<p>Kurdistan Islamic Group &#8211; 2 seats</p>
<p>Religious Minorities &#8211; 8 seats<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />Total Seats:  325</p>
<p>There is a small chance that Allawi will overtake Maliki <br />as the overseas votes are counted.</p>
<p>Should Maliki keep his lead he will have to (1) form a government with his arch rival Allawi.  or (2) form a largely Shia supported government with Sadr.  or (3)  try to break apart the other coalitions and form a government with the Kurds, small parties, and defectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolai</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>man, i almost want the usa to stay in iraq so the us military doesn&#039;t have the strength to attack iran, or give israel the go-ahead to do so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, i almost want the usa to stay in iraq so the us military doesn&#39;t have the strength to attack iran, or give israel the go-ahead to do so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>&quot;Jacoby: US Withdrawal on Schedule&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Glad to hear that since June of last year there are no longer any combat forces in Iraqi cities (including Baghdad) as was required by article 24 section 2 of the US-IRAQ SOFA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;All United States combat forces shall withdraw from Iraqi cities, villages, and localities no later than the time at which Iraqi Security Forces assume full responsibility for security in an Iraqi province, provided that such withdrawal is completed no later than June 30, 2009.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We&#039;re on schedule, sure we are, by re-designating what &quot;cities, villages, and localities&quot; are, and re-branding &quot;combat troops&quot; as &quot;Advisory Training Brigades&quot; or &quot;Advisory Assistance Brigades&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Jacoby: US Withdrawal on Schedule&quot;</p>
<p>Glad to hear that since June of last year there are no longer any combat forces in Iraqi cities (including Baghdad) as was required by article 24 section 2 of the US-IRAQ SOFA.</p>
<p>&quot;All United States combat forces shall withdraw from Iraqi cities, villages, and localities no later than the time at which Iraqi Security Forces assume full responsibility for security in an Iraqi province, provided that such withdrawal is completed no later than June 30, 2009.&quot;</p>
<p>We&#39;re on schedule, sure we are, by re-designating what &quot;cities, villages, and localities&quot; are, and re-branding &quot;combat troops&quot; as &quot;Advisory Training Brigades&quot; or &quot;Advisory Assistance Brigades&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/world/middleeast/15mideast.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;March 14, 2010&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Netanyahu Offers Apology, but No Shift in Policy&lt;br /&gt;By ISABEL KERSHNER&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel told his cabinet on Sunday that the ill-timed announcement of new housing plans for a Jewish neighborhood in East Jerusalem during a visit by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. last week had been “regrettable” and “hurtful.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. Netanyahu also said that the government had set up a committee to “examine the chain of events and to ensure procedures” to prevent such an episode from happening again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But he did not indicate that the building project would be canceled — a move that might mollify the Obama administration and ease the start of indirect, American-mediated peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. In fact, the prime minister did not refer explicitly at all to the contentious issue of building in East Jerusalem....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/world/middleeast/15mideast.html<br">link to nytimes.com</a><br /> /><br />March 14, 2010</p>
<p>Netanyahu Offers Apology, but No Shift in Policy<br />By ISABEL KERSHNER</p>
<p>JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel told his cabinet on Sunday that the ill-timed announcement of new housing plans for a Jewish neighborhood in East Jerusalem during a visit by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. last week had been “regrettable” and “hurtful.”</p>
<p>Mr. Netanyahu also said that the government had set up a committee to “examine the chain of events and to ensure procedures” to prevent such an episode from happening again.</p>
<p>But he did not indicate that the building project would be canceled — a move that might mollify the Obama administration and ease the start of indirect, American-mediated peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians. In fact, the prime minister did not refer explicitly at all to the contentious issue of building in East Jerusalem&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonsieurGonzo</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>MonsieurGonzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>It is stunning how quickly IRAQ has been and will continue to drop off the radar screens of most Americans. imho They will shun their invasion and military occupation so completely that ~ rather than their being some lingering &quot;reality&quot; -vs- &quot;revisionist&quot; historical polarization, &#039;IRAQ&#039; will become so radioactive, so distasteful a chapter that everyone, right, left and center will want to disown it. There never was any &lt;i&gt;Old Glory&lt;/i&gt; opportunity for American assault and occupation troops, from the beginning ~ and the ending will be entirely managed by international &#039;corporatists&#039;, who, unlike mis-led soldiers ~ almost always remain unashamed of the rubble they wrought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is stunning how quickly IRAQ has been and will continue to drop off the radar screens of most Americans. imho They will shun their invasion and military occupation so completely that ~ rather than their being some lingering &quot;reality&quot; -vs- &quot;revisionist&quot; historical polarization, &#39;IRAQ&#39; will become so radioactive, so distasteful a chapter that everyone, right, left and center will want to disown it. There never was any <i>Old Glory</i> opportunity for American assault and occupation troops, from the beginning ~ and the ending will be entirely managed by international &#39;corporatists&#39;, who, unlike mis-led soldiers ~ almost always remain unashamed of the rubble they wrought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>.&lt;br /&gt;Any word on a drawdown in the number of contractors who are authorized to engage in combat operations as part of their assigned duties ? &lt;br /&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.<br />Any word on a drawdown in the number of contractors who are authorized to engage in combat operations as part of their assigned duties ? <br />.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/jacoby-us-withdrawal-on-schedule-al.html#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juancole.com/?p=5029#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>The Sadrists, who practically made Maliki PM in 2006 now say that he cannot remain PM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is quite critical. Most of the Iraqi National Alliance votes are actually for the Sadrists, who also have a long running fued with the Hakim family. I would rate the chance of a Sadrist withdrawl from the INA at over 80%. The weight of the rest of the INA is too small and there is no love lost between them and Maliki anyway.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Kurds are now in fourth place, (Maliki + Kurds would muster maybe135 seats well short of the 167 seat threshold. They have a huge list of demands in exchange for a deal, and Maliki has already said that a deal with them is unlikely.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An Allowi/Maliki coalition can produce a majority, but the fight over the spoils will not be settled easily, and can also result in walkouts by disgruntled members from both.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A government of national unity has already been derided by Maliki and most of the Arab politicians. It has already failed to deliver as every minister follows the oreders of his or her party, not the PM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The individuals winning the seats are largely different from the 2006 parliament too. Fewer are from the London and Tehran mobs that the US tanks brought in, and there are far more nationalists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new government will therefore be very different indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sadrists, who practically made Maliki PM in 2006 now say that he cannot remain PM.</p>
<p>This is quite critical. Most of the Iraqi National Alliance votes are actually for the Sadrists, who also have a long running fued with the Hakim family. I would rate the chance of a Sadrist withdrawl from the INA at over 80%. The weight of the rest of the INA is too small and there is no love lost between them and Maliki anyway.</p>
<p>The Kurds are now in fourth place, (Maliki + Kurds would muster maybe135 seats well short of the 167 seat threshold. They have a huge list of demands in exchange for a deal, and Maliki has already said that a deal with them is unlikely.</p>
<p>An Allowi/Maliki coalition can produce a majority, but the fight over the spoils will not be settled easily, and can also result in walkouts by disgruntled members from both.</p>
<p>A government of national unity has already been derided by Maliki and most of the Arab politicians. It has already failed to deliver as every minister follows the oreders of his or her party, not the PM.</p>
<p>The individuals winning the seats are largely different from the 2006 parliament too. Fewer are from the London and Tehran mobs that the US tanks brought in, and there are far more nationalists.</p>
<p>The new government will therefore be very different indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

