To these posters repeating the much overblown threat of a Iranian Revolution Redux (You know, the threat stated constantly by Mubarack & The Jerusalem Post.):
I ask you, even if it was so, don't you understand that trying to squelch the will of the people would simply enhance the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood; just as Kissinger's groping of Iran empowered the fundamentalists.
I just love it when Obomabots & Hillbots contend that "he's just playing it smart" or that "he's walking a tightrope, poor thing.."
The point is, at the minimum, he shouldn't have endorsed Suleiman and Hillary shouldn't have been protecting a constitution written by a dictatorship and insisting that Mubarak stay on till the fall. In order to stay in the good grace of our other dictator friends & Israel, he should have remained silent while warning the regime, through diplomatic channels, of the risks if there is a bloodbath.
Tragically:
What was lost, was a golden moment to bolster our credibility with the people of the Muslim world.
Here is a link to a piece that exemplifies our major problem in this domain: (one may find it nauseating)
Forgot to say thank you, once again, for calling out our nation's foreign policy.
It looks as though any chance for improved relations between the Muslim world and we "judeo-christians" has again been squandered.
Again, we chose to sacrifice the "other's" freedom in order to execute our "War on Terror".
Seems as though BHO & HRC haven't a clue and that they aren't aware the term blowback.
I am dumbfounded by the willful turning away from asking serious questions of the administration's motives by fellow Obama supporters.
I'll bet that, if it was Dubya & Condi running the same show,
there would be real dissent.
To these posters repeating the much overblown threat of a Iranian Revolution Redux (You know, the threat stated constantly by Mubarack & The Jerusalem Post.):
I ask you, even if it was so, don't you understand that trying to squelch the will of the people would simply enhance the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood; just as Kissinger's groping of Iran empowered the fundamentalists.
I just love it when Obomabots & Hillbots contend that "he's just playing it smart" or that "he's walking a tightrope, poor thing.."
The point is, at the minimum, he shouldn't have endorsed Suleiman and Hillary shouldn't have been protecting a constitution written by a dictatorship and insisting that Mubarak stay on till the fall. In order to stay in the good grace of our other dictator friends & Israel, he should have remained silent while warning the regime, through diplomatic channels, of the risks if there is a bloodbath.
Tragically:
What was lost, was a golden moment to bolster our credibility with the people of the Muslim world.
Here is a link to a piece that exemplifies our major problem in this domain: (one may find it nauseating)
http://www.npr.org/2011/02/05/133520533/Different-Meanings-Of-Democracy-For-West-Middle-East
Forgot to say thank you, once again, for calling out our nation's foreign policy.
It looks as though any chance for improved relations between the Muslim world and we "judeo-christians" has again been squandered.
Again, we chose to sacrifice the "other's" freedom in order to execute our "War on Terror".
Seems as though BHO & HRC haven't a clue and that they aren't aware the term blowback.
I am dumbfounded by the willful turning away from asking serious questions of the administration's motives by fellow Obama supporters.
I'll bet that, if it was Dubya & Condi running the same show,
there would be real dissent.