Dear mister Cole, there are unconfirmed reports now in Belgian and French press that there actually is a link: weapons. The Charlie Hebdo attackers are suspected to have bought weapons from the "neutralized" Belgian jihadists.
Let us suppose now this strategy works, what will the Americans have achieved? That the Assad government takes back control of the lost territory. Exactly the opposite of their strategic planning. And the ones responsible for this all (Gulf states), are their so-called "coalition partners". Why are they not bombed? Because they have oil and a lot of money. The cynicism of it all...
Unsinn. I can't see any whitewash. It is just an historical overview of two factions that both have to deal with extremism in a country artificially created by colonial powers.
Dear mister Cole, there are unconfirmed reports now in Belgian and French press that there actually is a link: weapons. The Charlie Hebdo attackers are suspected to have bought weapons from the "neutralized" Belgian jihadists.
Let us suppose now this strategy works, what will the Americans have achieved? That the Assad government takes back control of the lost territory. Exactly the opposite of their strategic planning. And the ones responsible for this all (Gulf states), are their so-called "coalition partners". Why are they not bombed? Because they have oil and a lot of money. The cynicism of it all...
Unsinn. I can't see any whitewash. It is just an historical overview of two factions that both have to deal with extremism in a country artificially created by colonial powers.
One of the most interesting dissident voices about the Middle East. From Belgium with love.