Another question, Juan: If right-wingers insist on the 2nd amendment's provisions without any sense of its historical bearing now, why not make that very amendment require all said arms to be muskets?
Yes, my thoughts exactly on that section you cited. I see little hope in the future for this situation. I was born in the US but have lived in Canada for a long time now, and the difference is stark, even despite our current right-wing government spawned from our oil-rich, most pro-American province, Alberta.
F*****g right!! You sum it well from Oregon
good questions fron Juan; good answers from Jezebel. says it well for me: http://jezebel.com/5968540/fuck-you-guns
Maybe because they're political eunuchs, that, as you say, are more dutiful than aware. They're ensconced, comfortable with their status quo.
Indeed. I don't want to think about where it might go.
Another question, Juan: If right-wingers insist on the 2nd amendment's provisions without any sense of its historical bearing now, why not make that very amendment require all said arms to be muskets?
Excellent post. If they were always called 'long-range killing devices' we might have more sanity in legislation.
Correct. At least no change significant enough to prevent the same reoccurring.
That's being picayune.
Precisely.
Yes, my thoughts exactly on that section you cited. I see little hope in the future for this situation. I was born in the US but have lived in Canada for a long time now, and the difference is stark, even despite our current right-wing government spawned from our oil-rich, most pro-American province, Alberta.