It’s a struggle between fundamentalist and moderate interpretation of a religion and its compatibility to democracy and the ballet box and more of it and the consequences of it and establishing a tradition of it is a preferred way forward, it seems phony because a vote against the fundamentalist is not the appeal of the secular democrats and so is arming and cheer leading the extremist, propping up the secular democrats and bemoaning the lack of the never land democracy. Now I am curious about the private billionaires you mention funding the extremist from Afghanistan to Western Sahara and puzzled how an Iranian, Russian or Ukrainian might have gas today (for sale) and its account froze and assets sized tomorrow, yet this private financing of violence continues apace.
It’s a struggle between fundamentalist and moderate interpretation of a religion and its compatibility to democracy and the ballet box and more of it and the consequences of it and establishing a tradition of it is a preferred way forward, it seems phony because a vote against the fundamentalist is not the appeal of the secular democrats and so is arming and cheer leading the extremist, propping up the secular democrats and bemoaning the lack of the never land democracy. Now I am curious about the private billionaires you mention funding the extremist from Afghanistan to Western Sahara and puzzled how an Iranian, Russian or Ukrainian might have gas today (for sale) and its account froze and assets sized tomorrow, yet this private financing of violence continues apace.