What's really depressing is how many people buy in when the MSM and even the government gaslight you with the Red Menace.
Still no evidence offered.
It's a very thin narrative, and it was never a sure thing for Clinton, who started off with enough baggage to offset her name recognition, but then doubled down w/ a dirty primary campaign (lied about-- then lies outed and proven true). Then Podesta told us independents that they didn't want or need us.
Message received.
Then, Clinton held *no press conferences* for almost a year, and threw about half of the rallies that Trump did.
She was counting on the propaganda that Podesta's lapdogs in the press constantly shoveled at the public. (Chant w/ me: Racist! Mysoginist! Xenophobe!)
But, they ran out of credibility long, long ago.
Now, after all the shilling and lies and astroturfing they expect us to believe it was Russia?
No. It was not Russia. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/
"Simply acclaiming the person with the most votes to be the winner"...
Changing the rules after the race is run? When the rules are the US Constitution?
I am not a Trump voter, but what you're talking about is a coup-d'etat.
There was a bunch of scolding rhetoric in the couple of weeks before the election about certain parties accepting the results if they didn't go their way. Rhetoric about the rule of law and a peaceful transition of power.
Democrats have shown the bottomlessness of their hypocrisy in this election cycle and continue to show it.. They believe in social inclusion.. equal rights for all.. in a lawless plutocracy where we've all got to sacrifice for the 1% or be damned.
The US could really use a left wing party right about now.
What's really depressing is how many people buy in when the MSM and even the government gaslight you with the Red Menace.
Still no evidence offered.
It's a very thin narrative, and it was never a sure thing for Clinton, who started off with enough baggage to offset her name recognition, but then doubled down w/ a dirty primary campaign (lied about-- then lies outed and proven true). Then Podesta told us independents that they didn't want or need us.
Message received.
Then, Clinton held *no press conferences* for almost a year, and threw about half of the rallies that Trump did.
She was counting on the propaganda that Podesta's lapdogs in the press constantly shoveled at the public. (Chant w/ me: Racist! Mysoginist! Xenophobe!)
But, they ran out of credibility long, long ago.
Now, after all the shilling and lies and astroturfing they expect us to believe it was Russia?
No. It was not Russia.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/
"Simply acclaiming the person with the most votes to be the winner"...
Changing the rules after the race is run? When the rules are the US Constitution?
I am not a Trump voter, but what you're talking about is a coup-d'etat.
There was a bunch of scolding rhetoric in the couple of weeks before the election about certain parties accepting the results if they didn't go their way. Rhetoric about the rule of law and a peaceful transition of power.
Democrats have shown the bottomlessness of their hypocrisy in this election cycle and continue to show it.. They believe in social inclusion.. equal rights for all.. in a lawless plutocracy where we've all got to sacrifice for the 1% or be damned.
The US could really use a left wing party right about now.