Well, such a demand is a very specific step, rather than a goal. And one doesn't reach a stable state by supporting fundamentalist loonies against a relatively stable government. No, I think you're quoting the rationale, not the goal. If that is the goal, the US has no idea how to get there. If it does, why keep it such a secret? Secret benevolence is always a false hypothesis in national policy.
And why would we not have worked with Assad on moving toward majority rule over time? Surely he sees the that as the future, perhaps in ten or twenty years. Numerous incentives could have been applied.
No, the US keeps its policies secret because they are acceptable to no one but the Israelis and Saudis and MIC. And its announced plans never worked because the secret plans did. And those benefit no one in the US but the oligarchy.
The only useful path is agreement between the US, Russia, and Iran on the end result, and agreement with Turkey and Syria on the means. But no agreement is possible because the US has no beneficial interest or plan in Syria just as it had no plan for Iraq. The goal of the US government is solely to make trouble, using extremists to cause disruption near Israel and obstruct Russia and Iran in their spheres of influence.
The US does not consider results other than disruption, nor means other than force, and this prevents any humane agreement in the ME. The inevitable US failure in Iraq to establish a democracy with minority rights led to ISIS, and the US has even worse plans in Syria, with no likelihood of minority rights under the Sunni majority. Democracy and peace among factions is cultivated by preparing the soil, not by choosing sides randomly and killing everyone who disagrees. The inability to arrange talks or even find moderates is the direct result of US militarist intervention instead of foreign aid, education, and diplomacy.
This is because most US politicians are bribed by Israel and KSA and the MIC; they are traitors against the US and war criminals, by choice and by personality. They are infantile bullies propelled upward in an unregulated economy by their lack of ethics. The US cannot plan or agree to a plan to benefit humanity until it reforms its corrupt government. It cannot do that because mass media and elections are already controlled by economic power. The only constructive role for the US is its containment by others.
Well, such a demand is a very specific step, rather than a goal. And one doesn't reach a stable state by supporting fundamentalist loonies against a relatively stable government. No, I think you're quoting the rationale, not the goal. If that is the goal, the US has no idea how to get there. If it does, why keep it such a secret? Secret benevolence is always a false hypothesis in national policy.
And why would we not have worked with Assad on moving toward majority rule over time? Surely he sees the that as the future, perhaps in ten or twenty years. Numerous incentives could have been applied.
No, the US keeps its policies secret because they are acceptable to no one but the Israelis and Saudis and MIC. And its announced plans never worked because the secret plans did. And those benefit no one in the US but the oligarchy.
The only useful path is agreement between the US, Russia, and Iran on the end result, and agreement with Turkey and Syria on the means. But no agreement is possible because the US has no beneficial interest or plan in Syria just as it had no plan for Iraq. The goal of the US government is solely to make trouble, using extremists to cause disruption near Israel and obstruct Russia and Iran in their spheres of influence.
The US does not consider results other than disruption, nor means other than force, and this prevents any humane agreement in the ME. The inevitable US failure in Iraq to establish a democracy with minority rights led to ISIS, and the US has even worse plans in Syria, with no likelihood of minority rights under the Sunni majority. Democracy and peace among factions is cultivated by preparing the soil, not by choosing sides randomly and killing everyone who disagrees. The inability to arrange talks or even find moderates is the direct result of US militarist intervention instead of foreign aid, education, and diplomacy.
This is because most US politicians are bribed by Israel and KSA and the MIC; they are traitors against the US and war criminals, by choice and by personality. They are infantile bullies propelled upward in an unregulated economy by their lack of ethics. The US cannot plan or agree to a plan to benefit humanity until it reforms its corrupt government. It cannot do that because mass media and elections are already controlled by economic power. The only constructive role for the US is its containment by others.