I donĀ“t recall when was the last time any government did not try its best to spy and control the population backing from the ancient Greek. It is just that the technology the better it is the thiner is the line between the level of secrecy of the government and the level of secrecy of the population. Back in the days when first telephone lines appeared the operator not only used to listen to the discussion but it used to intervene if someone used obscene language giving a warning to the parties or shutting down the connection. The better the technology of surveillance the more the population will know about the politicians.
if the level of surveillance will be hard to accept then people will create super LANs and all kind of wireless Intranets where you are not required to give any confidential information to connect to super wireless networks using wireless broadband routers, and there will evolve peer to peer messaging services and will be a new level of connectivity making harder than ever for the gov to control it. And I did not even start to talk about the various encryption methods like those using pages of texts that are acknowledged by people in the real world and which are unbreakable unless you know what book or wall of text they use for the cypher.
You cannot beat the Internet, it is designed to win, how ironic that the officials are going to accelerate the evolution of individual secrecy through their unstopping sniffing.
And as I said it before, the monotheist religions are the worst between all forms of religion because they embodies the image of a dictator, he the only one who governs everything. The religion was taking ten steps backwards since the people abandoned their polytheist views of the Universe.
But in those times of constant wars and continuous disasters, diseases and famine the monotheism was better for organizational purpose, allowing the leaders to gather more people under one flag. At that time, at around 600 some smart guys in the Arabian peninsula decided that in order to be able to face the danger represented by the Jews who were allied with the Europeans through their Christianity bounds, they have to invent a religion as totalitarian in views as Christianity.
You cannot write a history of the religion different that just a trivial record if you put aside the reason for the cause of its appearance. You have to be an atheist to do that, at least for a while.
Goldman Sunk who?
I donĀ“t recall when was the last time any government did not try its best to spy and control the population backing from the ancient Greek. It is just that the technology the better it is the thiner is the line between the level of secrecy of the government and the level of secrecy of the population. Back in the days when first telephone lines appeared the operator not only used to listen to the discussion but it used to intervene if someone used obscene language giving a warning to the parties or shutting down the connection. The better the technology of surveillance the more the population will know about the politicians.
if the level of surveillance will be hard to accept then people will create super LANs and all kind of wireless Intranets where you are not required to give any confidential information to connect to super wireless networks using wireless broadband routers, and there will evolve peer to peer messaging services and will be a new level of connectivity making harder than ever for the gov to control it. And I did not even start to talk about the various encryption methods like those using pages of texts that are acknowledged by people in the real world and which are unbreakable unless you know what book or wall of text they use for the cypher.
You cannot beat the Internet, it is designed to win, how ironic that the officials are going to accelerate the evolution of individual secrecy through their unstopping sniffing.
Why through banks? You people will never learn do you?
Although the article is quite interesting I would not consider the gun control legislation the best example for the case.
And as I said it before, the monotheist religions are the worst between all forms of religion because they embodies the image of a dictator, he the only one who governs everything. The religion was taking ten steps backwards since the people abandoned their polytheist views of the Universe.
But in those times of constant wars and continuous disasters, diseases and famine the monotheism was better for organizational purpose, allowing the leaders to gather more people under one flag. At that time, at around 600 some smart guys in the Arabian peninsula decided that in order to be able to face the danger represented by the Jews who were allied with the Europeans through their Christianity bounds, they have to invent a religion as totalitarian in views as Christianity.
You cannot write a history of the religion different that just a trivial record if you put aside the reason for the cause of its appearance. You have to be an atheist to do that, at least for a while.