As you have read Tyerman's books on the eyewitness accounts of the Crusades I think that it would be interesting for you to read the conclusions Tyerman as historian derived from historical sources. So I suggest you his books "God's War: A New History of the Crusades" or " "Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades" on wich you can find on line an interview searching google for " Interview: Christopher Tyerman Discusses His Book on the Crusades".
I could agree (only some doubts about the hospitals and Maimonides in his manuscripts used Hebrew characters but OK ) but what would you think if a teacher to espose his students (among them he knows there are non Christians) to the Greek script had used John 20:30-31 or the first two phrases of the Nicene Creed?
As you have read Tyerman's books on the eyewitness accounts of the Crusades I think that it would be interesting for you to read the conclusions Tyerman as historian derived from historical sources. So I suggest you his books "God's War: A New History of the Crusades" or " "Fighting for Christendom: Holy War and the Crusades" on wich you can find on line an interview searching google for " Interview: Christopher Tyerman Discusses His Book on the Crusades".
I could agree (only some doubts about the hospitals and Maimonides in his manuscripts used Hebrew characters but OK ) but what would you think if a teacher to espose his students (among them he knows there are non Christians) to the Greek script had used John 20:30-31 or the first two phrases of the Nicene Creed?