it would be useful for us and maybe Professor Cole can one day provide an article on how the term terrorism has been used throughout history to distinguish the difference between state sanctioned violence and violence committed by adversaries with myriad real or imagined grievances. The way that it is used currently is for the purpose of obfuscation and demonization. I do agree with the Governors use of the term to describe this act of violence.
Astonishing to me how ignorant (Anon) some of the commenters are about the history of Cuba and the revolutionary period. Ms. Hines article is informative as well as authentic.
fidel castro just reemerged a few days ago, and he is warning about an imminent war against iran, which could escalate into a nuclear profligation. what ever you think about castro, he has often been correct in his assessments, and this time i hope that he is wrong. i recall that during the lead up to the first iraq war, the cuban delegation in the u.n. was stating that the invasion of iraq was imminent, while progressives in the u.s. assumed that the u. s. was blustering.
the u.s. navy is on the move and there is a reason for that.
it would be useful for us and maybe Professor Cole can one day provide an article on how the term terrorism has been used throughout history to distinguish the difference between state sanctioned violence and violence committed by adversaries with myriad real or imagined grievances. The way that it is used currently is for the purpose of obfuscation and demonization. I do agree with the Governors use of the term to describe this act of violence.
Astonishing to me how ignorant (Anon) some of the commenters are about the history of Cuba and the revolutionary period. Ms. Hines article is informative as well as authentic.
fidel castro just reemerged a few days ago, and he is warning about an imminent war against iran, which could escalate into a nuclear profligation. what ever you think about castro, he has often been correct in his assessments, and this time i hope that he is wrong. i recall that during the lead up to the first iraq war, the cuban delegation in the u.n. was stating that the invasion of iraq was imminent, while progressives in the u.s. assumed that the u. s. was blustering.
the u.s. navy is on the move and there is a reason for that.
what you wrote is the resounding truth!