I really wish you were right but even though there will be downsides to global warming for russia such as a crumbling infrastructure, russian arable land will increase by 37 to 67 percent. It will be a net plus for them. In addition Russia is one of the least globally minded places according to a pew research poll so dont count on altruism. They get it do in their adversaries and get rich doing it. I really wish i was wrong on this one, but they will be one of the few countries that actuallly benefit.
we in the US are the stupid ones because we will get hammered as we ignorantly ignore scientific facts. The Russians don't dispute the facts because they will be the prime beneficiary.
Actually I dont believe that but it is entirely possible that Russia will benefit and every other country be worse off, especially the US which has a large vulnerable coastline. This might be the long term plan of russia which might be the real reason they supported trump
"And Russia! For generations poets have bemoaned this realm as cursed by enormous, foreboding, harsh Siberia. What if the region in question were instead enormous, temperate, inviting Siberia? Climate change could place Russia in possession of the largest new region of pristine, exploitable land since the sailing ships of Europe first spied the shores of what would be called North America. The snows of Siberia cover soils that have never been depleted by controlled agriculture. What’s more, beneath Siberia’s snow may lie geologic formations that hold vast deposits of fossil fuels, as well as mineral resources. When considering ratification of the Kyoto Protocol to regulate greenhouse gases, the Moscow government dragged its feet, though the treaty was worded to offer the Russians extensive favors. Why might this have happened? Perhaps because Russia might be much better off in a warming world: Warming’s benefits to Russia could exceed those to all other nations combined."
I think the question is not the hacking but that the Russians took it one step further by releasing emails on just one candidate. This certainly swayed some votes albeit a small percentage. This could have made a difference in states like PA or Michigan.
The biggest loser in all of this is the environment because the president elect will almost certainly reverse Obama's green initiatives and probably withdraw from the Paris accord which will encourage other countries to do likewise
He forgot to mention Iran and Hezbollah. Why should they remain? They were complicit in the death of 400k+ people.
But then why we are wishing for the impossible we should ask that Santa Claus leaves as well.
I really wish you were right but even though there will be downsides to global warming for russia such as a crumbling infrastructure, russian arable land will increase by 37 to 67 percent. It will be a net plus for them. In addition Russia is one of the least globally minded places according to a pew research poll so dont count on altruism. They get it do in their adversaries and get rich doing it. I really wish i was wrong on this one, but they will be one of the few countries that actuallly benefit.
we in the US are the stupid ones because we will get hammered as we ignorantly ignore scientific facts. The Russians don't dispute the facts because they will be the prime beneficiary.
Actually I dont believe that but it is entirely possible that Russia will benefit and every other country be worse off, especially the US which has a large vulnerable coastline. This might be the long term plan of russia which might be the real reason they supported trump
"And Russia! For generations poets have bemoaned this realm as cursed by enormous, foreboding, harsh Siberia. What if the region in question were instead enormous, temperate, inviting Siberia? Climate change could place Russia in possession of the largest new region of pristine, exploitable land since the sailing ships of Europe first spied the shores of what would be called North America. The snows of Siberia cover soils that have never been depleted by controlled agriculture. What’s more, beneath Siberia’s snow may lie geologic formations that hold vast deposits of fossil fuels, as well as mineral resources. When considering ratification of the Kyoto Protocol to regulate greenhouse gases, the Moscow government dragged its feet, though the treaty was worded to offer the Russians extensive favors. Why might this have happened? Perhaps because Russia might be much better off in a warming world: Warming’s benefits to Russia could exceed those to all other nations combined."
I think the question is not the hacking but that the Russians took it one step further by releasing emails on just one candidate. This certainly swayed some votes albeit a small percentage. This could have made a difference in states like PA or Michigan.
The biggest loser in all of this is the environment because the president elect will almost certainly reverse Obama's green initiatives and probably withdraw from the Paris accord which will encourage other countries to do likewise