I appreciated your 10/2014 column but noticed that the historical religious tolerance you mention was mostly among people whose faiths were based, and whose power sharings were understood with heterosexual women and LGBT women and men having reduced status vis a vis heterosexual men.
There would be no religion of those times to remember, much less any toleration among religions of those times to remember, without the shared premise among heterosexual men that a supreme being understood as male intended their kind to rule.
I appreciated your 10/2014 column but noticed that the historical religious tolerance you mention was mostly among people whose faiths were based, and whose power sharings were understood with heterosexual women and LGBT women and men having reduced status vis a vis heterosexual men.
There would be no religion of those times to remember, much less any toleration among religions of those times to remember, without the shared premise among heterosexual men that a supreme being understood as male intended their kind to rule.