We have been down this path before. The corporately owned media do not and will not call out the lies and misrepresentations about Iran.
We have been down this path before with the corporately owned media being handmaidens for beating the drums of war. And now the New York Times is adding their voice in support of the tRump administration lies about the Saudi ship that was attacked.
Ms. Lindsay announced today his support for Crazy Ted Cruz. If Ms. Lindsay run for president on the platform of 'more and more wars' did not seal his fate as being a walking and talking azzhole, I am unsure what would.
Perhaps Dr. Cole could provide some reason to believe that The Donald could be any worse for Mideast policy than Hillary 'Whatever war you want Benny NutAndYahoo' Clinton.
My perception is that Bernie is not pro-Likud while Hillary and all of the repub candidates definitely are. To me, that provides the closest possible to a balanced view of Middle East policy.
While she would not reverse the Iranian agreement on her first day in office, do we believe that the hawkish Hillary Clinton would be far behind a republican in imposing a Likud-centric policy that reinstate a version of Neocon policy in the Middle East?
War in the middle east against any Arab nation (even if they are not Arabs) is a triple play for the Dick Cheneys of the world.
War in the middle east:
- is great for defense industry profits
- inflates oil prices
- distracts from the actions of our ME allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel
As the Iranians are Shia Muslims and ISIS is Sunni and believes that Shia Muslims are apostates to the true Muslim religion, the policies of Iran are basically irrelevant to ISIS hatred of Iran.
Mottos of the 1/10th of 1%ers:
- More is never enough!
- I've got mine, f*ck you!
We have been down this path before. The corporately owned media do not and will not call out the lies and misrepresentations about Iran.
We have been down this path before with the corporately owned media being handmaidens for beating the drums of war. And now the New York Times is adding their voice in support of the tRump administration lies about the Saudi ship that was attacked.
Ms. Lindsay announced today his support for Crazy Ted Cruz. If Ms. Lindsay run for president on the platform of 'more and more wars' did not seal his fate as being a walking and talking azzhole, I am unsure what would.
Perhaps Dr. Cole could provide some reason to believe that The Donald could be any worse for Mideast policy than Hillary 'Whatever war you want Benny NutAndYahoo' Clinton.
...given the corporate ownership of the mainstream U.S. media.
My perception is that Bernie is not pro-Likud while Hillary and all of the repub candidates definitely are. To me, that provides the closest possible to a balanced view of Middle East policy.
While she would not reverse the Iranian agreement on her first day in office, do we believe that the hawkish Hillary Clinton would be far behind a republican in imposing a Likud-centric policy that reinstate a version of Neocon policy in the Middle East?
War in the middle east against any Arab nation (even if they are not Arabs) is a triple play for the Dick Cheneys of the world.
War in the middle east:
- is great for defense industry profits
- inflates oil prices
- distracts from the actions of our ME allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel
As the Iranians are Shia Muslims and ISIS is Sunni and believes that Shia Muslims are apostates to the true Muslim religion, the policies of Iran are basically irrelevant to ISIS hatred of Iran.