I read you religiously, and agree with you 99%. But now:. What right did the U.S. have to bomb Syria? or to sponsor/acquiesce in Turkey's recent invasions? To what degree are Assad's opponents non-Syrians encouraged by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey? To what degree has Obama been using them as a partner for a proxy war? These are serious questions, which don't deserve to be buried (as in the corporate media) by someone as genruinely rightminded as you.
You say our murder of 62 Syrian troops, and wounding 100 others (which you reduce to "dozens") was probably "friendly," but you don't mention that it was an invasion of Syria. Are you saying that we didn't know we were invading? or that it was a justifiably "friendly" invasion?
I read you religiously, and agree with you 99%. But now:. What right did the U.S. have to bomb Syria? or to sponsor/acquiesce in Turkey's recent invasions? To what degree are Assad's opponents non-Syrians encouraged by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey? To what degree has Obama been using them as a partner for a proxy war? These are serious questions, which don't deserve to be buried (as in the corporate media) by someone as genruinely rightminded as you.
You say our murder of 62 Syrian troops, and wounding 100 others (which you reduce to "dozens") was probably "friendly," but you don't mention that it was an invasion of Syria. Are you saying that we didn't know we were invading? or that it was a justifiably "friendly" invasion?
Juan, why did you choose such a provocative (and dubious) headline, if you then don't develop its theme or comment on it in any way?