I think most people gave on a 2 state solution years ago. A single state where everyone is given an equal footing, with suitable laws imposed for many years to address decades of unfair policies has to be the way forward.
I do find this confusing. As I thought the idea of ISIS was 'strict enforcement' of Islamic principles (subject of much debate of course). But I thought it was a prety much universally accepted understanding that the Prophet Muhammad specifically forbid the destruction of churches etc. So, I'm curious what logic is being claimed as the basis to justify this sort of action ?
Being fairly 'illiterate' in these matters myself...
I've often read/heard that this was with reference to persons from past times (pre 'islam') or for those that have not properly received the 'message'. May I ask if these verses clearly reflect a tense (past/current) in your opinion ?
I sometimes think of this in terms on the 'The Matrix'. Where the Oracle Tells Neo he is not 'the one'. i.e. The message is carefully worded for its intended audience in order to guide. Suggesting you will be alright regardless, kind of detracts from that 🙂
My theory is Trump got mixed up about which country and leader he was talking to and read off the wrong script.
I think most people gave on a 2 state solution years ago. A single state where everyone is given an equal footing, with suitable laws imposed for many years to address decades of unfair policies has to be the way forward.
I do find this confusing. As I thought the idea of ISIS was 'strict enforcement' of Islamic principles (subject of much debate of course). But I thought it was a prety much universally accepted understanding that the Prophet Muhammad specifically forbid the destruction of churches etc. So, I'm curious what logic is being claimed as the basis to justify this sort of action ?
Creit to the chap. Hope it goes viral...
Being fairly 'illiterate' in these matters myself...
I've often read/heard that this was with reference to persons from past times (pre 'islam') or for those that have not properly received the 'message'. May I ask if these verses clearly reflect a tense (past/current) in your opinion ?
I sometimes think of this in terms on the 'The Matrix'. Where the Oracle Tells Neo he is not 'the one'. i.e. The message is carefully worded for its intended audience in order to guide. Suggesting you will be alright regardless, kind of detracts from that 🙂