I Posted On New List H Mideast Politics

Posted on 01/26/2003 by Juan

I posted on the new list H-Mideast-Politics an inquiry about the lack of grassroots democratic practice in the Middle East. I said that I had read in Asharq al-Awsat last year that the Egyptian parliament was seriously considering allowing elections for the governors of the major provinces, eg Buhayra, Minya, etc.

I wondered if this practice of appointing provincial governors went back

to the 1950s military junta or if governors have always been

appointed.

Then I began wondering about mayor positions. What about the mayor of towns like Asyut or Zaqaziq? Also appointed?

Sometimes the appointed governor has been at odds with the parliamentary

deputation from his province, as occured in Minufiyya in 1999. Is this an

appointed-versus-elected sort of issue? What exactly is the relationship

of the provincial governments to the parliamentarians elected from that

province, usually? I saw one quote that said that provincial secretaries

decided on the parliamentary slate. Provincial secretaries of the ruling

NDP? Or of the governorates? How do you get to be a provincial secretary?

How common is the appointment by the center of provincial governors and

mayors in the Arab world? I mean, one expected it in Saudia or the

Baathist states. But Egypt? What is the situation in, say, Lebanon, or

Jordan?

Is it possible that one of the problems for democracy in the region is that

most genuine democracy starts at the local level, and they do not have it

at that level, or even at the state/province level? After all, a lot of US

presidents have been former governors of states and got their start in

politics that way.

Some informed folks replied that the provincial governors are also appointed in Turkey, so we may be looking at an Ottoman heritage here. But there the office of mayor is an elected one and mayors are important civic leaders. Another poster suggested that there is generally a split in the world between democracies built from the ground up, such as the US, and more centralized ones that do more appointing from the top down.

It seems to me that if we are going to get democracy in a post-Saddam Iraq, that it should be set up so that mayors and provincial governors are elected. Democratic practice has to occur at the local level if it is to have any chance at the national level.

0 Retweet 0 Share 0 StumbleUpon 0 Printer Friendly Send via email

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off | Print

Comments are closed.

  • Juan Cole

    Juan Cole

    Welcome to Informed Comment, where I do my best to provide an independent and informed perspective on Middle Eastern and American politics.

    Informed Comment is made possible by your support. If you value the information and essays, I make available and write here, please take a moment to contribute what you can.

  • IC Destinations



  • Keep up with Informed Comment at:

  • Donate to Global Americana Institute

    Donate to the Global Americana Institute to support the translation into Arabic of books about America.
  • Friends and Interlocutors:

  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

    • Omar Khayyam (23) (3)
      • Poplicola: Nice. The Whinfield translation has its own qualities of course. Quoth fish to duck, “‘Twill...
      • Greg Panfile: Loving these. I assume you are working from the same Persian source as Whinfield but doing new...
    • World’s 1.6 Billion Poor Going Green (6)
      • super390: I’m disappointed that there’s not more response to this posting. Prof. Cole is broaching a...
    • The Dilemma over Syria (29)
      • super390: I don’t see how either this or Libya could be defined as genocides unless the population of a...
      • Andy Lovas: Don’t agree at all. We are better than not to do everything we can to keep people from being...
    • Omar Khayyam (12) (3)
      • pabelmont: Is this a pre-global-warming lament? It seems to speak of doing the usual things that people do —...
  • Archives

  • Categories