Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Iraqi Prisoner Abuse
Preparations for Cairo Conference


Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari revealed Tuesday that nearly 200 prisoners detained by the Ministry of the Interior had been discovered to have been tortured and half-starved.

The State Department spokesman alleged that the US does not practice torture! And said it did not expect others to do so. But surely Abu Ghraib was a signal to the Iraqi secret police as to what was permissible.

Jaafari's revelations may be part of an internal power struggle in the Iraqi government. The Ministry of the Interior is dominated by the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, a fundamentalist Shiite party. It is a coalition partner but also a rival of Jaafari's Dawa Party. SCIRI is alleged to have packed the secret police with members of its paramilitary, the Badr Corps, who were trained by the Revolutionary Guards in Iran. Sunni Arabs are accusing Badr of being behind the torture of the prisoners.

The incident (surely one of many) is a further indication that just holding elections does not create democracies.

Even Republican senators are becoming impatient for Bush to present them with regular reports on the situation in Iraq and his plans to extricate the US from the morass. A Democratic push for a timetable for withdrawal of US troops was sidestepped, but the Senate's new reporting requirements are the first direct intervention in Iraq War policy from Capitol Hill, which has consistently deferred to the imperial presidency since 9/11.

A majority of Americans believes that Vice President Dick Cheney manipulated the intelligence on Iraq before the war. Hmmm. They noticed, at last.

There were further bombings and attacks in Kirkuk and Baghdad on Tuesday, killing Iraqi police in each case. The US continued its operations near Syria, killing and capturing more Sunni Arabs accused of forming part of the guerrilla movement. But the US asserttion that these sweeps will increase Sunni Arab participation in the December 15 elections is not plausible.

A roadside bomb killed 3 GIs in the north of Baghdad on Tuesday. Another three US troops have been killed in the previous two days.

The Baathist regional commander in Diyala Province was captured on Nov. 9, it was revealed on Tuesday. Now that is progress. I have been unimpressed by the alleged killings of dozens of "key aides to Zarqawi" over the past few months. But a real Baathist commander, that is a catch. And taking him will have a positive effect on the counter-insurgency effort.

Al-Hayat: Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim Jaafari on Tuesday withdrew his envoy to Damascus in protest against Syrian President Bashar al-Asad's allegation that Iraqi officials "are not the final authorities" in their own country (implying that they are American puppets.)

Jaafari also announced that he would attend the conference for national reconciliation in Cairo after he had been reassured by the Arab League as to the identities of the participants. Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmad Abu al-Ghait did not think it unlikely that Baathists might attend, though they will have had no blood on their hands. He said that a minister of petroleum or a former ambassador or an artist might be among them.

Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the leader of the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, will send a "hawk" from his organization to the conference to combat any accusations launched against the Shiites. (The paramilitary of SCIRI, the Badr Corps, has been accused by Sunni Arabs of being involved in massacres and ethnic cleansing against them.)

In addition to personalities such as President Jalal Talabani, Vice President Ghazi al-Yawir, and vice premier Ahmad Chalabi, the Cairo conference will be attended by SCIRI and Dawa representatives (the religious Shiite parties) and the Association of Muslim Scholars. The AMS delegation will probably be led by Harith al-Dhari, a hard line cleric who is among the more popular Sunni Arab leaders.

The Shiite coalition is refusing to be the object of accusations, whether as a group or individually, at the conference, and it has given representations that it will ensure the safeguarding of Iraqi national unity.

The US military has admitted at last to having used white phosphorus as a weapon against guerrillas in Fallujah. But it denies using it against civilians and denies that it is a chemical weapon.

Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska) has had the courage to raise the question of whether the Middle East is actually worse off now than in 2002, as a result of the missteps of the Bush administration in Iraq.

Well, certainly if you were planning to live in Baghdad, it was better in 2002, as long as you were willing to stay out of politics and avoid criticizing the regime. But when you sent your child to school, you could be certain of the child coming home safe. That is worth a lot, and it is gone.

Hagel is suggesting a Middle East regional ministerial meeting to deal with Iraqi security. Since Iraqi leaders refuse to accept troops from neighboring countries, however, and since they have no army, and since the more distant countries with good armies such as Egypt and Morocco and Pakistan are unlikely to want to send troops to Iraq, it is not clear what the ministers could do in a practical way.

12 Comments:

At 9:26 AM, Blogger dancewater said...

You forgot to mention that all the men detained in the torture prison were Sunni, and all claim to have been rounded up by Iraqi military.

 
At 10:35 AM, Anonymous Christopher Anderson said...

I myself was wondering to what degree the latest torture news has to do with internal struggles within the Iraqi government. It seems hard to believe that the US military suddenly "discovered" this was going on after being totally in the dark beforehand. Beyond simply a fight between the SCIRI and Dawa, I wonder if wide play this news is getting isn't a more an attempt to generally weaken the Shiite religious parties before the Dec. 15 elections on the part of the US?

 
At 1:14 PM, Anonymous Piotr Chmielarz said...

I agree with this commment. This is impossible that occupants doesn't know what do their subordinate. i think that USA send a signal to shiite leader. Ok you can torture sunni but you will not resist if we attack Iran or...

 
At 1:36 PM, Blogger Comandante Agí said...

Christopher:

Your theory would make sense considering US officials tried to weaken the Shi'ite religious vote in the January 2005 elections. I believe this is the latest incident in the escalation of a Sunni/Shi'ite civil war. Media coverage of this event will enrage the Sunni population and may even strengthen the insurgency...

 
At 1:50 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re - Use of white phosphorous in Fallujah:
I don't know how much airplay this Italian documentary has received in the US (very little, it seems), but it would appear to give the lie to US military claims not to have used white phosphorous on civilians.
RAI News Italy (English version)

 
At 5:48 PM, Anonymous Paulo said...

Beyond simply a fight between the SCIRI and Dawa, I wonder if wide play this news is getting isn't a more an attempt to generally weaken the Shiite religious parties before the Dec. 15 elections on the part of the US?

If that is the case, how could one explain Jafaari playing along with that scheme? Why would he weaken his own party, which as part of the ruling class has to have at least some responsability on the affair?

I don't believe he can spare Dawa from the scandal, unless he outrightly accuses SCIRI and/or Badr, and cuts relations with them, which I don't think will happen, at least on the foreseable future.

 
At 5:52 PM, Blogger elendil said...

This incident is part of a much wider pattern of abuse by Iraq's new govt. It has been going on since at least July 2004. There is a Human Rights Watch report on it, written in January this year. In that report, HRW claimed that US military were present for some of the abuses which were being conducted by Iraqi forces.

 
At 7:08 PM, Blogger bhfrik said...

I find it interesting that it was U.S. troops that surrounded the interior ministry. Why not have Iraqi's do the work and demonstrate some independance while providing a figleaf at the same time for the central govt. by having them root out their own problem. This may not be coalition forces busting up a jail to release a couple of their operatives, but it is yet another example of American involvement in what should intrinsically be an internal affair.

 
At 12:02 AM, Anonymous Donald Thieme said...

It seems to me that the first place to look for those responsible for the torture would be the "Wolf Brigade" within the Iraqi police. The brigade's accomplishments were lauded in several U.S. magazines and newspapers during the past year, and there was even a television show featuring their detainees' "confessions" in Iraq. So it seems absolutely ridiculous for Rummy et al to pretend that they did not know about this. While it is a native Iraqi force, we have sent them advisors such as Colonel James Steele.

 
At 12:42 PM, Anonymous PJ said...

According to the NYT account of the torture story "Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch, a senior U.S. military officer in Iraq, told reporters that U.S. troops, led by U.S. Brig. Gen. Karl Horst, went to the facility because a 15-year-old boy was believed to be held there illegally."

Come on. We sent a brigadier general out to look for a 15-year-old boy? We not only knew what was going on in there, we knew that a sergeant would have been ignored. A general who can get the Interior Minister on the phone, however... different story.

What's the point? Maybe we're trying to share the heat. If Iraqis are torturing their own, maybe people will believe it isn't so bad that we're doing it.

 
At 3:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

>>But surely Abu Ghraib was a signal to the Iraqi secret police as to what was permissible.<<

I'd be hesitant to insinuate that somehow these Iraqi jailers needed a "signal" or encouragement from US personnel to commit such acts. Dreadful as they are, Iraqis have been guilty of such crimes before. There's well-documented evidence (including video) that Iraqis have been torturing other Iraqis for years. Sadly, this is true of many states in the region.

 
At 2:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

bhfrick:
" Why not have Iraqi's do the work and demonstrate some independance while providing a figleaf at the same time for the central govt. by having them root out their own problem."
What does this say about Iraqi sovereignty which is the legal basis of US presence in Iraq? "figleaf" is a good description.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home