Stevenson on Riots in France
Roger Stevenson kindly writes:
"Thanks so much for your thoughtful and enlightened piece on the riots that are currently besetting France. I, too, am extremely upset over the inflated, sensational and unfactual reporting from the US media outlets.
Steyn's comments make you wonder if he has even ever set foot in the country let alone done any meaningful research on the social conditions in France's HLM housing developments. As a retired American academic who now lives in France and who has also been naturalized as a French citizen, I have not just a passing interest in the causes of and solutions to the current situation.
I have been reminded over the past two weeks of on-going violence of my classes on French civilization and culture in the States. I always made it a point when we discussed immigration and social integration problems in France to emphasize that,
in my opinion, this was one of the most serious problems that France would be faced with in coming years.
I agree for the most part with your analysis of the historical factors and the neglect that French society in general has shown for the problems of minority ethnic groups. The housing problems and discrimination they face in everyday life are truly tragic. France was forced in the 50's and 60's to embark on large scale housing projects to house the increasing numbers of immigrant labor families that the economy needed, with the result that these large high rise apartment buildings are now ghetto-like neighborhoods that are often poorly maintained and very overcrowded.
The remnants of France's colonial empire are now stacked, often 12 stories high, in what the French call "rabbit cages." It is easy to understand how the youth of these
underprivileged projects feel totally disenfranchised from the mainstream of French society. Many have dropped out of a very rigid education system, and the prospects for any kind of meaningful future in terms of a job, career, decent housing, a feeling of self-worth, etc., are very bleak.
And when the Minister of Interior, Nicolas Sarkozy, talks of clearning up these housing projects with a "Kärcher" (a high pressusre steam cleaning machine) and refering to the youth of these projects as "racaille" (I think the best translation is "scum", what does he expect ? Such incendiary language has no place in dealing with the victims of many decades of social neglect and has, in fact, only served as a further catalyst to the present violence.
And yet, from what I read in the French press, there are other factors at play here. Le Monde had a series of articles in the Tuesday, Nov., 8th edition where many of the kids from these projects as well as their parents are interviewed. One mother is quoted as saying that these young men (there are very few young girls involved) have no future ahead of them and yet are the victims themselves of a gang mentality that is in operation in the suburbs. They have no values other than those of money and consumerism, and drug trafficking is one of the few means they have of making money. A group of young girls is quoted as saying that alone these young men would never think of torching a car, but in the group/gang mentality they would be considered a coward if they refused to go along with the group. "They would be nothing in the
neighborhood."
Another factor that is important to realize is that their actions are largely designed to attract attention to them and to their plight. The group of girls interviewed were upset that there were no police helicopters flying over their neighborhood on the particular night they were interviewed. "Seine Saint Denis get the helicopters. We are losers here."
It's a complicated issue and one that will take considerable wisdom on the part of the authorities to quell the disturbances and put into place meaningful strategies and programs to deal with the underlying causes of the unrest. Contrary to what one hears and reads in the US media, this is not at all a Muslim intifada (There is currently an interesting thread on Helena Cobban's Blog), and the frequent comparisons to May '68 are only partially correct. For one thing, I doubt very much that the popoulation at large would ever support their actions. The general strike in '68 was the result of large-scale involvement in the student uprising by many elements of French society. That just won't be the case now. In fact, in a poll released this morning, over 80% of the French, including a majority of those polled from the left, approve the curfew measures decreed by Villepin yesterday."
Cheers,
Roger Stevenson

|
6 Comments:
When Roger Stevenson refers to something like American “street-gang culture” underlying the violence to some extent, I was reminded of NPR's reportage of yesterday, likewise playing down the direct political motivation of the rioters.
Not to play down the rioters' genuine socioeconomic beef myself, but I was reminded of Les Miserables, which portrays a Paris street uprising that was unashamedly apolitical. In fact, the young (native) rioters' only apparent motivation was to kill random passersby for the thrill of it.
I realize that Hugo wanted Jean Valjean's son-in-law, a leader of the phony insurgency, to be as evil a Goofus as possible to contrast with the saintly Valjean, the better to hammer in his point that a police record (and the poverty that breeds street crime) says little about true human respectability. But if literary classics concerned with serious social issues need to meet some minimum standard of plausibility for their intended audiences, then perhaps this fictional episode has some relevance to today’s turmoil.
All human cultures have their dark side, of course. I should clarify that I’m an overall admirer of the postmodern French, not least for giving themselves the world’s most efficient health-care system (according to the World Health Organization in 2000).
racaille = rabble. It's quite clear, and is verifiable in any French dictionary. "Scum" is a much harsher term, and it is not likely to have been what Sarkozy meant.
I would like to point out that the french riots actually look to me as a "giant version" of soccer hooliganism, which is very common in Europe, and has much more to do with social conditions than with racial or immigration issues (although they sometimes get added to the mixture). There are lots of examples, but I'd like to point out this one (see the section "The Spring 2004 Derby Riot"), because it involves people from the very same city, because most of the hardcore fans of the two teams live in the notorious Rome borgate (comparable to Paris banlieus, except that immigrants are only a relatively small minority of the population), and because the gangs of hardcore fans (that usually fight each other bitterly) put up an "unified" fight against the police.
I am no Sarko apologist, but I would disagree with the translation of "racaille" as scum. It's more like rabble. Racaille has a range of derogatory meanings that scum lacks. For example, parents might refer to their rowdy kids as "petite racaille." Obviously, that was not what Sarkozy had in mind, and an aspiring statesman should know better than to use such inflammatory language. Racaille rhymes, both in sound and meaning, with canaille (scoundrel) and doesn't carry the punch (and grossness) of scum.
An odious little column appeared in my local paper today. It was Anne Applebaum's cri de coeur entitled "But, What Counry Is This?" comparing American and French governmental reponses to Katrina and the rioting respectively.
Comparing? I meant to say gloating. As if anyone could crawl so low as to gloat about New Orleans et al. It sure sounds as if the beltway is humming "Freedom fries now, freedom fries forever" again. Polls are down? Quick, rally the troops, mock the French!
What struck me though, was how she completely missed the boat. Obviouly, the 2003 European heat wave is the better parallel.
Roger Stevenson has it exactly right, especially when it comes to mistakes by American media and comparisons to May 68.
I'm a Journalism/French Studies grad student at NYU and was in the middle of writing a paper on May 68 when the Beur (French slang for "arabe") riots erupted.
One of the things that disappointed me the most about supposedly high-quality U.S. media coverage of this year's riots was that they were so often linked to global terrorism and international muslim issues. It just goes to show how important it is to leave our American glasses behind on occasion. The Beurs are slightly more accurately compared to our own pseudo-colonial subjects, second-generation Latin American immigrants.
Regarding May 68, I too am sad that socioeconomic differences are keeping the general population from joining. It is also very smart what the police are doing in trying to stem the violence. Had the early Nanterre students (from a university suburb where those projects were new at the time) been confined to their parents' homes in the second week, May 68 would never have taken over the country.
Sarkozy and Chirac are following in the august footsteps of De Gaulle, who called the 68 riots a much dirtier term ("chienlit", a nasty word for disorder). De Gaulle also waited about three weeks to speak, whereas Chirac, who is still criticised for the delay, took about one week.
Looking forward to further discussion,
Carolina Jimenez-Marcos
Post a Comment
<< Home