Quran Quote of the Day on Peace
The Muslims say "hello" with the phrase "as-Salamu `alaykum"-- "peace be upon you." Once the pagan, polytheistic Meccan tribes started attacking the Muslims and trying to wipe them out, the question was raised of how to repond when a pagan not connected to the Meccans greeted a Muslim.
The instinct was to refuse to accept the sincerity of the greeting, "peace be upon you," which was also a pledge of non-violence toward the person greeted. That tendency was reinforced by greed, since if the Muslims fought these pagan strangers and won, they would legitimately be able to demand loot from them. (This was a tribal, often nomadic society, and that was the custom when tribes raided each other).
The Quran settles this dilemma. It says that Muslims are not to taunt pagans who greet them with "peace be upon you" by shouting, "You're not a Muslim!" They are to accept the sincerity of the greeting, and are not to get so greedy for spoils that they let it affect their judgment of others. When you are offered peace, take it.
Quran 4:94:
. . . Do not say to one who offers you peace, "You are not a believer," seeking the spoils of this life. For God has abundant treasure. You used to be like them, after all, and then God blessed you.
Neither 4:94, nor 4:90, quoted on Friday, imply that pagans must give up their paganism in order to be at peace with, and treated well by Muslims. Rather, the Quran takes a two-track approach. As a monotheistic scripture, it condemns idol worship and warns its practitioners of hell-fire in the afterlife. But as a matter of everyday, this-worldly practice, the Quran commands Muslims to live in peace with pagans who do not make war on them and who approach them in peace.
This is the answer to the reader who asked about the Quran's attitude to atheists. The Quran condemns unbelief as spiritually wrong and as leading to perdition in the next life. But the Quran says Muslims should live in peace with nonviolent pagans in this world, if the pagans are inclined to coexistence with the Muslims.
Readers asked me about the long list of militant verses collected by polemicists against Islam. The answer is that those verses refer to the Meccan power elite in the 620s AD, who were waging a determined military, political and economic war to defeat the Muslims holed up in nearby Medina, and wipe them and the new religion out. It is frankly dishonest to take a verse about, say, the battle of Badr against the militant Meccan pagans ("unbelievers") and imply that it refers to contemporary American Christians or American atheists for that matter. What was objectionable to the Quran in practical terms about the Meccan unbelievers was their murderousness toward Muslims, not their attachment to their star goddesses. Muslims are instructed to be nice to unbelievers who don't share that murderousness.
Note that I am explicating the Quran itself. Later Muslim commentators have interpreted it in many ways, and much Muslim law and practice are based on later customs and traditions. I am here deploying the technique of the hermeneutical circle, using texts from the book to illuminate other texts from the book. This strategy makes sense because we don't have any works we can be sure are as early as, and contemporaneous with the Quran. The biographies of the Prophet were produced nearly two centuries later and more.
Much later Quran interpretation was done by persons who lived in militaristic, feudal societies, or who lived in empires where Muslims were a ruling caste, and their interpretations were shaped by these circumstances. They also tended to lack the techniques of contextual and causal thinking typical of contemporary academic writing. The Quran was produced at a time when the Muslims were a small group, and persecuted by the richer and more powerful Meccan pagans, and the Quran is not picky about the beliefs of the friendly tribes willing to be at peace with the Muslims.


8 Comments:
I like these Quran explanations, and I hope your readers gain some insight. With scary survey results like 46% of Americans claiming an "unfavorable" opinion of Islam, and half of Americans thinking Islam oppresses women (although twice as many women convert as men in America), and a quarter of Americans beliving that Islam teaches violence and hatred, and 20% believe that its okay to lock up Muslims and limit their civil liberties, I'm worried at what's going to happen to me if Islamophobia gets worse in America. People already burned down mosques and the hate crime is sky high. Please keep up the good work of explaining Islam to people.
Prof Cole, you forgot a vital ayah in your explanation: “When you are greeted with a greeting, return it with a better greeting or its equal. Surely, Allah takes account of all things.” (An-Nisa’: 86)
As a result of that ayah, and explained in this fatwa (and another), If a non-Muslim greets with "Assalaamu 'alaykum" ('The Peace be upon you') a Muslim can reply, "Wa 'alaykum," which means "you too."
One claim I hear from people arguing Islam generates violence is that when it comes to resolving contradictions within the Quran, statements made later in time supercede earlier statements, and that the Quran becomes more violent with time. That is to say, all the exortations to peace with pagans are early Quran, which are to be ignored by believers because there are more violent claims in the later Quran.
Now, my sister-in-law is devout Muslim, and she's never heard of this. But I hear the claim a lot from Republicans.
Dr. Cole
Thank you for your explanation of the Quran. Your comments provide some counterweight to the opinions of such people as Sam Harris "The End Of Faith" who contend that Islam, among all religions, is uniquely bellicose
The verses I have been quoting come late in the Quran, so the issue of later abrogation is not really relevant for the most part.
Also, remember that the issue of what verses abrogate others is a matter of later personal opinion among medieval jurists and modern Muslim thinkers are often revising the matter. It isn't as if the Quran announces for the most part that it is abrogating itself. I actually don't think there is much abrogation, and much of what was claimed by the medievals was an attempt to support their vision of the Quran, which was often in my view wrong.
I am saying, as an academic observer, let the text speak. When you listen, it is an advocate for peace, except where a vicious attempt at ethnic cleansing has been launched on a community, in which case it advises believers to fight a good war. In a way, it is very American...
Many of those who rely on polemic, explicate the Q'ran as they explicate their own Bible, one sentence at a time or one sentence from this Gospel and this phrase from the OT and this clause from Paul and try to construct a rational worldview from this. Therefore, it seems the world and its problems to them boils down to making it as simple as possible.
Excellent article on the Quran really enjoyed reading it. actually printed it out to share with friends.
salam
Mark Zimmerman wrote: "One claim I hear from people arguing Islam generates violence is that when it comes to resolving contradictions within the Quran..."
There are no contradictions in the Qur'an. :)
"...statements made later in time supercede earlier statements"
The issue of abrogation doesn't really apply in these instances, not only for the reasons given by Dr. Cole, but because most (if not all) of the abrogated ayat deal with rules concerning how Muslims are to live a proper life (e.g., the three ayat dealing with alcohol).
"...and that the Quran becomes more violent with time."
Trying to understand the Qur'an without knowledge of its historical context is difficult at best and seemingly near impossible for many non-Muslims. Portions of the Qur'an were frequently revealed after a particular event had occured, providing guidance and understanding for the early Muslim community as to what had just happened. This is especially the case with Surah 8, Spoils of War, which many Christians use as "evidence" for the Qur'an "exhorting" violence; they do not seem to understand that the surah was revealed after the Battle of Badr, not before.
"That is to say, all the exortations to peace with pagans are early Quran, which are to be ignored by believers because there are more violent claims in the later Quran."
This belief can be refuted simply by looking at when the five ayat that Dr. Cole has discussed so far were revealed. Only one (25:63) was revealed in the "early" Qur'an, being classified in the late Meccan period. The other four were revealed in the Medinan period, in the last ten years of the Prophet's (pbuh) life. (Surah 28, Al-Qausas, is considered a late Meccan surah, but ayat 52-55 and ayah 85 were revealed at Medina. Dr. Cole refers to 28:55.)
I'm glad that there are people like you out there, who are willing to look and the Quran and study it. I was beginning to think people like you no longer existed, because all you see these days is abuse targetted at Islam. May God bless you. Peace be with you.
Post a Comment
<< Home