Another Fraud on Iran: No Legislation on Dress of Religious Minorities
Maurice Motamed, the representative of the Iranian Jewish community in Iran's parliament, has strongly denied the rumors started by Canada's National Post that the Iranian legislature has passed a law requiring members of religious communities to wear identifying badges.
The report was also denied on Montreal radio by Meir Javedanfar, Middle East Analyst and the Director for the Middle East Economic and Political Analysis Company.
The National Post was founded by Conrad Black and has been owned by CanWest since 2003,* is not a repository of expertise about Iran. It is typical of black psychological operations campaigns that they begin with a plant in an out of the way* newspaper that is then picked up by the mainstream press. Once the Jerusalem Post picks it up, then reporters can source it there, even though the Post has done no original reporting and has just depended on the National Post article, which is extremely vague in its own sourcing (to "human rights groups").
The actual legislation passed by the Iranian parliament regulates women's fashion, and urges the establishment of a national fashion house that would make Islamically appropriate clothing. There is a vogue for "Islamic chic" among many middle class Iranian women that involves, for instance, wearing expensive boots that cover the legs and so, it is argued, are permitted under Iranian law. The scruffy, puritanical Ahmadinejad and his backers among the hardliners in parliament are waging a new and probably doomed struggle against the young Iranian fashionistas. (The Khomeinists give the phrase "fashion police" a whole new meaning).
There is nothing in this legislation that prescribes a dress code or badges for Iranian religious minorities, and Maurice Motamed was present during its drafting and says nothing like that was even discussed.
The whole thing is a steaming crock.
In fact, Iranian Jewish expatriates themselves have come out against a bombing campaign by the US or Israel against Iran. There are still tens of thousands of Jews in Iran, and expatriate Iranian Jews most often identify as Iranians and express Iranian patriotism. I was in Los Angeles when tens of thousands of Iranians immigrated, fleeing the Khomeini regime. I still remember Jewish Iranian families who suffered a year or two in what they thought of as the sterile social atmosphere of LA, and who shrugged and moved right back to Iran, where they said they felt more comfortable.
This affair is similar to the attribution to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of the statement that "Israel must be wiped off the map." No such idiom exists in Persian, and Ahmadinejad actually just quoted an old speech of Khomeini in which he said "The occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time." Of course Ahamdinejad does wish Israel would disappear, but he is not commander of the armed forces and could not attack it even if he wanted to, which he denies.
I had a very disturbing short email correspondence with a reporter of a major national newspaper who used the inaccurate "wiped off the face of the map" quote. When challenged, he said it was "carried by the news wires and is well known" or words to that effect. I pointed out that the "quote" was attributed to a specific speech and that the statement was inaccurately translated. When challenged further he alleged that his trusted translator in Tehran affirmed that Ahmadinejad had said the phrase. When that was challenged, he reported that the translator said that anyway he had said something like it. When I pointed out that the translator was either lying or lazy, the reporter took offense that I had insulted a trusted colleague! I conclude that this reporter is attached to the phrase. He complained about being challenged by "bloggers" and said he was tempted to stop reading "blogs."
So this is how we got mire in the Iraq morass. Gullible and frankly lazy and very possibly highly biased reporters on the staffs of the newspapers in Washington DC and New York. And they criticize bloggers.
On how Iran is not actually any sort of military threat to Israel, see the op-ed at the Star Ledger by Thomas Lippman and myself. Lippman is a veteran Washington Post correspondent who covered the Iraq War.
Note: I had corrected the para in our op-ed that referred to the "wiped off the map quote" but somehow an earlier draft got sent out accidentally. Since the article instances it as an unlikely hypothetical, no harm done, I think.
Antonia Zerbisias has more on the Benador connections of this story. Same agency as got up the Iraq War.
See also Taylor Marsh.
----
*Thanks to readers who corrected this assertion. See comments for more.


42 Comments:
The story was made up by Amir Taheri, he is another left over of Iran's former monarchy regime who has now reformed and has become pro-democracy human rights activist.
http://www.benadorassociates.com/taheri.php
After National Post it was picked by prime ministers of Canada and Australia and they said the civilized world won't sand for this. By the way, I always wonder who are the permanent members of this so-called civilized world.
What's really sick is that this is an attempt to provoke Iran's mullah government and ultra-nationalists to crack down on religious minorities. They played the same game with Iraq too. They knew Saddam was nuts and so they put pressure on him, in turn Saddam tightened security to the point that Iraq becomes a closed society.
I don't think I would have said "lying or lazy" there. What you make of the phrase really depends on cultural knowledge necessary to figure out how certain idioms should be rendered into English. In either case, however, as I just commented on my own blog, this whole affair reminds me of what Matt Yglesias just said about the role of expertise in forming blogosphere opinions and how more traditional autorities don't seem to see that element of things.
Thank-you for clarifying that.
Michael Rubin was stepping up to the plate to make it sound plausible yesterday at NR's The Corner, implying that the Nazi's got their ideas for yelloe Jew tags from ninth century Iran. You can find it at this URL here, I hope; they've changed their format and its more iffy than before.
So an exchange with a knowledgeable critic is experienced solely as an obstacle to 'news' production. Bob Somerby has taken to calling this illness "blind to the script". The person tellig the story is so enamored of the narrative he or she doesn't see it as a story. And the repetitious recounting of the same script, in different 'sources', is taken as independent validation of the story.
Once the storyline is established, inconvenient details are simply ignored or reworked to fit the plot or the character. What is interesting is that those who bring the potentially disruptive details to the attention of the spinner-storytellers are accused of obscurantism, elitism, anti-semitism, and, oh my goodness, lying.
Meanwhile, the public really has no idea what this administration is planning vis-a-vis Iran and the Congress shows no real interest is finding out for us. Perhaps we need our own suveillance system of our own government?
A lazy or uninformed reporter? Perhaps. It's more likely, however, that the reporter is part of a psychological operations campaign. This reporter may be consciously participating, or may be a pawn being used by someone else (e.g., the translator or someone at the media who is suggesting a certain point of view).
It's good to point out these tactics whenever they are spotted. Most Americans are still too innocent about these things, even when they think they're not.
I note with some bemusement Professor Cole’s characterization of the National Post as "an obscure newspaper" (it is one of two nationally distributed papers in Canada), but his supposition of psy ops seems entirely plausible.
Re: the ownership of the Post, Conrad Black sold controlling interest in the paper to the late Izzy Asper’s CanWest Global chain in August 2000. More information on the Aspers and National Post here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izzy_Asper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Post
The National Post, while founded by Conrad Black, is now owned by the Asper family, who acquired Black's newspaper holdings across Canada. The Asper family, which also controls a TV network in Canada, are well known as strong supporters of Israel, and for enforcing a strongly pro-Israel editorial policy among the many newspapers they own across Canada. I would not be surprised to see the Post involved in floating such a story, and in fact see this as confirmation of a disturbing trend that I have noted lately of neocon memes being floated in the Canadian MSM for reflection in the American and international press.
The Harper government has been keenly aware of the communications strategies employed by the Republican right, and noted Republican operatives such as pollster and strategist Frank Luntz have stated that Harper's Conservatives and the Republican Party are natural allies. Luntz recently advised the Conservatives to paint the recently defeated Liberal party as being the party of "corruption". Harper has also recently been promoting a strongly "law and order" policy, cancelled a Liberal plan for a national day care policy in favour of a small family allowance for child care, and recently extended and expanded the commitment made by the former Liberal government for the use of Canadian forces in Afghanistan. The deployment was recently extended by a vote in Parliament for a further two years by a razor thin margin, which was only achieved by the votes of 6 Liberal MPs from my province of Nova Scotia, who feared being tarred as anti-military in Nova Scotia where the military has strong support and is a large part of the local economy.
This article on the National Post web site seems to have been taken down and is not cached on Google. If you go to the National Post and use its search feature to search "canada.com" for "religious minorities" the top three listing include the original report between two stories containing denials of the report. If try to follow the link to the story Iran eyes badges for Jews you are taken to a regular page of the National Post with all the usual accoutrements but with the place for the story and headline blank.
If you check out the Jerusalem Post their number two headline storey presently reads "Iran denies religious dress code law -- Canadian paper: Proposed Iranian law to force non-Muslims to wear colored bands."
This story starts out
" Iranian officials on Saturday denied a report published by the Canadian National Post the previous day, claiming that a new dress-code law was passed in Iran this past week, which mandates the government to make sure that religious minorities - Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians - will have to adopt distinct color schemes to make them identifiable in public."
But the eagerness of Canada's new conservative prime minister to denounce Iran over the National Post story has given the story new leggs. See this in the London Free Press "Harper chides Iran for non-existent racist bill it doesn't have"
"OTTAWA -- Prime Minister Stephen Harper was quick to condemn Iran yesterday for an anti-Semitic law that appears not to exist. Harper seized on a newspaper report that said Iran's hardline government would require Jews and Christians to wear coloured labels in public."
Your exchange with the reporter over the "wiped off the map" quote seems to further validate my working theory that "news" is more story telling than fact finding. The technology has evolved; Writing, the printing press, word-processing, the internet - but at the core it's the same story telling around the camp fire. The reporter is sure Ahmadinejad said "wiped off the map" because 30 yrs. of 'wilded-eyed Iranian fanatics' stories have made it conventional wisdom that Ahmadinejad would/must say it.
Two questions:
1) Doesn't Ahmadinejad's recent letter to Bush contain enough evidence that the writer considers Israel's very existence to be a crime?
2) Do you still insist that Ahmadinejad's other statements are merely metaphoric calls for a return to the pre '67 borders? Please note a contrary view:
http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/008552.php#c43
http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/008563.php#c34
2) Where would Iran aim an ICBM with a nuke? Hint: one target would have far more strategic deterrent effect than any other.
No one denies that Iran is no conventional threat to Israel. Neither does anyone argue that Iran would launch some suicidal first strike nuclear attack against Israel, if this were merely to show spite. The point is that a nuke would give Iran an "Oh, yeah" deterrent to US challenges to Iranian actions in the region. The US would no longer be able to tell Iran not to meddle or assert itself in the Gulf or Iraq. The US would not be able to blockade Iran or use aerial bombardments to punish Iran (as it did Libya) for supposed support for terrorist acts. Likewise, the US would never be able to offer military support for an insurgent threat against Iran's current regime. The US would always "blink" and back away, knowing the potential consequence: a nuked Tel Aviv.
Goodness, why do you think the US never invaded Cuba after all these years? Certainly it's not for fear of conventional forces or because exiles are opposed!
A great and important post. Enough by itself
to show that there are is a black propaganda outfit
that wants to start another war.
Nick Patterson
Thanks for debunking the Iranian nuclear threat propaganda. However, this insidious U.S. administration apparently has a Plan B. According to Jorge Hirsch, The evidence suggests that Dr. Casscells was asked to enlist in the Army to build up a "casus belli" against Iran: that Iran is engaged in biological weapons work, specifically creating a mutation of the H5N1 virus that is human-to-human transmissible.
He complained about being challenged by "bloggers" and said he was tempted to stop reading "blogs."
Even the facts are biased! Not listening!
After seeing a link to the article you mention as the lead story yesterday on right wing "the Drudge report", my impression when combined with news that there will soon be three carriers in the Gulf, was that the choice to bomb Iran had already been made. Money is being spent to send the carriers, and as you describe the "black psychological operations" are underway to foster public support. Another country bombed will mean another batch of individuals who will have lost loved ones and who will want revenge.
In history powers tend to balance vs the hegemon, a lesson Bush II seems to have missed at Yale. In this emerging multipolar system the US should be wary of actions other states will perceive as aggression. It only took 30 days from the assignation of the Archduke Ferdinand to stumble into the Great War. Humanity can not be permitted to falter like that again.
The National Post leans heavily right, and has been suffering from a credibility and readership problem ever since it was launched. Therefore, it's a bit beholden to the (predominantly US) interests that keep the right-wing machine running up here. That makes me wonder if their printing this story is an example of what you might call "propaganda laundering" -- they're acting as a "clean" source for something those interested parties want to inject into the discourse.
This article in today's Guardian provides insight into what is really happening in Baghdad...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1779414,00.html
Black no longer owns the National Post, CanWest, which is controlled by the Asper family, does. The Aspers are also supportive of Israel in the extreme.
It is soooo amazing how those foreign phrases translate right into american slang. It just goes to show that the linguistic expertise of american translators is without compare.
Sort of like the reporting skills of the contemporary press. My favorite part is how they omit the minor fact that Iran is as much of a military threat to Israel as Mexico is to the US.
Did you see the quote from Israel about an Iranian bomb being like a flying gas chamber? COME ON!! ever body know eye-ranans wanner kill mo arabs afor they git ta killin jews!!!
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
The National Post is actually now owned by CanWest Global now, which is in turn controlled by the Asper family. Black had to sell the paper as it never really made him any money. He's now in court for having allegedly stolen from his own company.
As for the Aspers, they have never made any secret of their staunch pro-Israel (pro-Likud?) stance. (In light of Walt & Mearsheimer being attacked, let me hasten to add that Israel is a democracy and has a right to exist, promote it's agenda, et cetera).
I've been wondering what your take would be on this suspect story, professor. It should be noted, however, that Conrad Black sold the National Post to CanWest Global in 2003.
The MSM has to start responding to information without that sort of defensiveness. They have to learn to say, "Let me check," and actually check and not assume that they know everything. (A journalism degree, even if they have one, doesn't make them an expert on everything.) And they have to stop taking things personally. This is about facts, not about "honor" or whatever they feel has been offended when you call them out on some mistake.
And they have to stop blaming blogs for finding the mistakes they put in there.
Glad to see this story discredited. Note that while Conrad Black founded the National Post, he sold it back in 2001 as his empire began to crumble. http://www.cbc.ca/story/news/national/2001/08/23/postblack_010823.html
Wikipedia was already on the case and linked to a National Post story casting doubt on its earlier one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Post#National_Post_and_.22Color_coding_minorities_in_Iran.22
As for Black, the National Post, and its current pro-Israel ownership, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Post
--Gene Keyes, Berwick, NS, Canada
"Informed comment?" Heh.. you might want to recheck your information about who owns the National Post.
Black sold it some years ago.
http://ianism.com
Mary from Canada here.... just to let you know, the National Post is no longer owned by reactionary media baron (and alleged crook)Conrad Black and hasn't been for several years.
In 2001, it was sold to a Canadian media conglomerate, Can West. Since then, the National Post has become slightly less right wing, though it is still known for its conservative stance and unbending support for Israel.
Also, referring to the Post as an "obscure newspaper" is a bit of a misnomer, unless you also believe that Canada is an obscure country. (Though perhaps, in the American context that is actually worthy of debate?).
While never catching the "Globe and Mail" as Canada's most widely read newspaper, the Post is available nationwide, even in the remote little mill-and-logging town where I live (Port Alice, BC). Many well-known journalists and commentators, both Canadian and American, have written or continue to write for it (including our home-grown neo-Conservative, David Frum, who used to work for George Bush and, I believe, coined the term "axis of evil").
Wikipedia has an article on the Globe and Mail and discusses the false story about religious dress codes that you discuss here. It can be found at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Post
This isn't a big mistake on your part, to be sure. However, I think it's important to point out the small things so as to keep the "big picture," which you describe so well, intact and as error free as possible.
To John Koch:
1. Iran does not have a nuclear weapon.
2. Al-Baradei of the International Atomic Energy Agency says he cannot find any proof that Iran is trying to get a nuclear weapon.
3. The National Intelligence Estimate is that Iran is 10 years away from a bomb even if it were trying to get one and even if the international community did not obstruct those efforts.
4. Ahmadinejad wants Israel to go away in a political sense, that is as an ideologically Zionist state. He has condemned any mass killing of civilians. He has never threatened to go to war against Israel. And he is not in command of the Iranian armed forces, so he could not if he wanted to.
There is no cause for war or casus belli here.
What's noticeable is how many news sources (and pro-war bloggers) accepted the story without delay, despite the fact that it was obviously a crock.
The presentation of this story, and the reaction to it in Canada were both really remarkable, and show how successfully the campaign of demonization being waged against Iran is going.
On the front page of Friday's Post (I'm looking at it now), a huge black-and white photograph runs under the bold headline 'Iran Eyes Badges for Jews': the photo shows a Jewish couple wearing yellow stars in Budapest in 1944, and its caption makes the Iran-Nazi link explicit: 'The Nazis required the stars to be worn to distinguish Jews from non-Semites. Now the government of Iran is formulating a law to require non-Muslims to wear distinctive colours: yellow for Jews, red for Christians.'
This page one, above the fold 'news' story by Chris Wattie is complemented by the Amir Taheri piece which takes up nearly all of page A13 (a David Broooks article called 'Freedom is out--Security is in,' reprinted from the NYT, runs down the right hand column). Actually, that's not quite correct: it's not simply Taheri's text that takes up the page (apart from Brooks), it's also a second large illustrative photograph (6 inches by 8.5 inches) of 'A middle-class businessman in Berlin in 1935, with a yellow star on his overcoat to indicate he is a Jew,' to quote the caption.
Taheri's article is entitled 'A colour code for Iran's "infidels"' and makes the allegations already familiar to readers. To hype the fear factor further, the Post's editors offset and bold a couple of other pieces of text: 'What is labelled 'the Islamic clothes reolution' will not be limited to Iran' (Hezbollah will be bringing it to Lebanon soon, the article tells us), and finally the real kicker: 'DANGEROUS PARALLEL: Is Iran turning into the new Nazi Germany? Share your opinion online at nationalpost.com"
After reading such a carefully executed piece of propaganda, what other opinion could you have but the obvious one?
To be honest, this kind of lazy equation of Iran and Nazi Germany is nothing new for the Post: columns and letters regularly make it.
The political reaction in Canada was interesting as well, showing a total lack of critical judgment among a number of politicians and reporters. A journalist asked Stephen Harper and visiting Australian PM John Howard for their reactions: both offered that, if true, the story was the most disturbing thing they'd ever heard, recalled Nazism etc., etc.
The article even made it to the floor of the House of Commons, where its alleged 'facts' formed the substance of the first question during Question Period and later on drew this hysterical demand of the Foreign Affairs Minister from Liberal MP Keith Martin:"Hon. Keith Martin (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, Canada's response must be focused, clear, strong and unequivocal. I ask the Minister of Foreign Affairs, will he bring the matter up at the United Nations Security Council? If this comes to pass, will he then call for an international ban on the purchase of Iranian oil?"
Clearly, he has things in perspective.
To his credit, Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay said that an unconfirmed report was no basis for such action.
All in all, a remarkable illustration of propaganda at work.
I feel it necessary to point out that I've seen about six articles denouncing or correcting this story for every one article that has referenced it as true. Professor Cole makes a negative reference to Jpost which is unfortunate as it was one of those news outlets correcting the story.
C
More coverage on the faux news here and here.
I was obsessing a bit on this piece of disinformation yesterday.
At one point I counted (through a Google News search) 81 news stories that accepted the National Post article verbatim, 9 that added contrary views to the recycle NP piece, and 4 that ran stories suggesting that the story was suspect.
That would be 86.2% willing dupes/biased media, 9.6% responsible media sites, and 4.2% media sites actually doing some digging.
Pretty pathetic...
Not that it's terribly significant but it appears that the National Post was sold to CanWest Global in 2001, not 2003 as I stated in an earlier comment. I mixed up the sale with the death of Asper senior which occurred in 2003.
Interestingly, Black's Hollinger Inc. once owned the Jerusalem Post. The National Post's current owner, CanWest Global, apparently owns 50% of the Jerusalem Post today (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Post). I'm wondering if this is the connection that shows why the National Post was chosen as the laundromat for this black propaganda.
For nearly 15 years Israel’s foreign policy objective would be to get the United States militarily involved in the Middle East. The primary objective would be to get the United States military to act as Israel’s proxy army for the purpose of taking Iraq, Syria, and Iran. Israel would accomplish this by influencing US foreign policy and public opinion through pro-Israeli advocates in the United States working in media, think tanks, lobbyists, and our government officials in the United States. This has not been a secret in Israel, yet for some reason, we in the United States were not privy to Israel’s plans for us.
Don’t believe me?
Read “Open Secrets: Israeli Foreign and Nuclear Policies” a book by the late Israel Shahak published in 1997. Israel Shahak, an Israeli Jew, provides a series of essays from the early 1990s describing how radical elements in the Israeli government would accomplish this feat. I find this book painful to read at this late date. America! We’ve been had! And we’ll continue to be had…on an Iranian battlefield……if Americans don't start waking up.
Thanks to you Dr. Cole for fighting the good fight. In my book, you are a true American Patriot.
I get the overall point of this, I think -- that the yellow star lie is being put forward because the American public finds it esp. inflammatory -- but this post comes across sorta "Relax, it's not religious minorities who are being regulated, it's only women." The yellow star thing is a lie, but the truth is bad enough. Not justification for attacking Iran, but bad. Just sayin'...
"Iranian dressing code": black PR op
When I first blogged on this scandal, I've noticed that, according to YNet, this story originated from the Iranian exiles. Most certainly, it was a bad sign - hostile immigrants are a remarkably bad info source, remember Chalabi/Judith Miller's IWMD game and raving neocon Amir Taheri?
So, now same National Post reports that both Iranian Embassy in Ottawa and Iranian Jews categorically reject that Iranian law demands any identifying marks by the religious minority groups. With this in mind, position of Canadian PM Harper turns out to be crudely anti-Iranian. Yes, he used quite a number of caveats in his statement. Still, in his version of political reality, Iranians are blamed for what they can do, not for their actual actions - everything as with IWMD!
Also, it appears that nobody else that pro-Likud media mogul and crook Conrad Black is behind this ugly story, he owns both National Post and JePo.
Position of Russian Grani.ru is also remarkable. Instead of putting it straight that their initial story was wrong, Grani publish the statement of Russian Muslim clerics who condemn accusations against Iran as and act of info war. The problem is, there is nothing about actual situation on the ground in Grani's aticle, so one can imagine that we have just difference of opinions.
2006-05-19 The dressing code war?
I don't know if this is connected, but it seems the timing of the story in the National Post coincides with a shift in Canada's diplomatic policy toward Iran.
Effective immediately, we will limit our encounters with Iranian officials to the Kazemi case, Iran's human rights record and Iran's nuclear non-proliferation performance. No visits or exchanges by Iranian officials to Canada will be permitted, nor will Canadian officials engage with Iran, except relating to these issues.
Rather interesting wouldn't you say?
When challenged, he said it was "carried by the news wires and is well known" or words to that effect.
"It doesn't matter what I've seen, Jon. The fact is, it's been widely reported, and that makes it factesque." - Stephen Colbert
It's probably worth noting that DoD psyops may not operate (legally, as if that matters anymore) within the United States. However, as far as I know, it is legal for them to plant news stories in other English-speaking countries, such as Canada or Australia...and naturally it would be "just blind luck" if those news stories made it into the American press, a la Zarqawi...
There seems to an agenda behind this, especially when the original labeling of the 3 religions were in alphabetical order, and just about all subsequent comments on the article has reordered it (and frequently with the "Zoroastrians" and even "Christians" dropped) to make it the Iranians more like Nazis.
It is even sadder to see these so called liberal blogs pick it up and promote it as part of their islamophobia campaign.
... and mean while the real analogy to the Nazi atrocities goes unreported.
BBQ Prisoners
Animals?
These are surely the dark days for Journalism. In a ceremony in Iran honors US poet for his translations of 13th century Persian poet Molana Rumi that honored the work of Colman Barks. Some how the false translation of "wipe out of the map" has to be included in the report. If an American University decided to honor a poet, would it make sense for the report of the event to also include George Bush's comment, let alone a fabricated comment?
Another "news" outlet to watch for Israeli psy-ops is World Net Daily, commonly referred to as "World Nut Daily". The readers of this "newspaper" are the typical combination of rubes, nuts, and Joe Sixpacks that you'd imagine. Inbetween the get-rich-quick schemes and the car-run-on-water schemes, you see a variety of potential psy-ops being run. The editor of this "paper" is a Lebanese Christian who hates Muslims with a passion and loves Israel with an equal passion, and who uncritically prints anything that's submitted to him by his Israeli "sources". The response of World Nut Daily's readers is then used to detirmine whether the trial balloon is worth actually floating out to a wider audience.
I saw this "Iran = Nazis persecuting Jews" trial balloon floated in World Nut Daily in a number of different attempts before this particular derivative got floated elsewhere. Apparently whoever is doing these psy-ops (Mossad?) has been using World Nut Daily's readers as a focus group to tailor their message for a wider audience. It will be interesting to watch World Nut Daily and see what the next psy-op trial balloon will be...
When I first saw the link to the Iranian arm band story on an MSN.com page last week, I IMMEDIATELY thought this was propaganda attempt to whip up some hatred for Iranians.
It turns out my cynicism and skepticism were justified.
I wonder what fake outrage they'll whip up for the next 2 Minute Hate.
The Drudge Report continues to try and breathe life into this discredited story.
So - is Drudge just aiming for sensational headlines, or is he trying to beat the drums for an Iran war?
Post a Comment
<< Home