Proposal: A Covenant with America
Here are my suggestions for a new covenant with America that could be adopted by politicians running for Congress this fall.
1. The American people do not want their courageous intelligence personnel endangered by politics at a time when international terrorism remains a real threat. If elected we will strengthen the law to make it easier to obtain indictments against those, like White House advisers Irv Lewis Libby and Karl Rove, who play politics with intelligence officers' lives.
2. The American people do not want dirty money in politics. To address misuse of funds such as that of former Republican congressional leader Tom Delay, we pledge to make it easier to prosecute money laundering for the purpose of fixing elections.
3. Five years after Usamah Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri sent their evil minions to attack New York and Washington, DC, they are still at large, and are still encouraging violence against the United States and its allies, as we saw in Madrid and London. The Bush administration has spent over $400 billion on an Iraq War unrelated to 9/11, but comparatively small sums on counter-terrorist efforts against the al-Qaeda leadership. We pledge to invest in genuine counter-terrorism and to strengthen cooperation with allies to disrupt and destroy al-Qaeda's remaining capacity.
4. The American people cannot be expected to pay trillions, and to sacrifice thousands more lives, for a failed land war in Iraq. We pledge to withdraw US ground troops from that country on a short timetable. The necessary political and military arrangements will be made to give the Iraqis a fighting chance of establishing stability on their own, but we believe that the very presence of US ground troops on the present scale provokes anger in some factions and makes others less willing to compromise.
5. The Bush administration misused and misrepresented intelligence on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction and repeatedly asserted or implied an operational link between Iraqi intelligence and al-Qaeda. Congress was systematically misled by briefers sent over from the executive branch. We pledge that if elected we will establish by law a panel of lifetime appointees to review intelligence for the president and congress, and to advise when they perceive any branch of the government to be distorting the professional intelligence community's findings for political purposes.
6. Americans should be secure from warantless invasions of their privacy. The Bush administration's abuses against the fourth amendment of the US constitution must end. If we are elected, we pledge to protect Americans from unreasonable and unauthorized government snooping by bureaucrats. Some of these practices are authorized by the so-called "PATRIOT" act, which we believe to contain provisions that defile our revered constitution and would have shocked and dismayed the founding fathers. Exceptions will be made for clear threats to national security, but those exceptions, too, must be promptly reviewed by a judge.
7. Cruel and unusual punishment was outlawed by our founding fathers. Torture goes against all the principles on which the United States was established. Nevertheless, in the world's eyes, the United States is now associated with disgusting photographs coming out of Abu Ghraib, showing unconcealed torture. If elected, we pledge to stop the executive branch from authorizing practices recognized in international law as torture. Likewise, the US constitution guarantees all the accused a speedy trial. Facilities such as Guantanamo Bay, where prisoners can be held indefinitely without charge and without trial, are as big a threat to the liberties of our Republic as is terrorism itself. If elected, we pledge to close it and to try the accused, convicting the guilty.
8. The failure of Congress to adjust the alternative minimum tax has allowed a measure that was intended to prevent the wealthy from avoiding taxes to become a new, stealth tax on the middle class. If elected, we pledge to significantly raise the threshold for the alternative minimum tax so as to strengthen the middle class, and we pledge to allow Bush's temporary tax cuts on the super-wealthy to lapse so as to keep the budget healthy. The economic recovery makes these temporary measures unnecessary, and letting temporary tax cuts lapse is not the same as raising taxes. The middle class has to choose whether it wants to pick up the bill here; we are saying it does not have to.
9. We pledge to work for green energy and to curtail America's dangerous dependence on foreign oil. Not only is it unwise to depend for our energy on unstable or hostile regimes abroad, carbon-based energy is causing a dangerous warming of the globe, and warming seas helped produce the catastrophe that befell New Orleans. If elected, we pledge a new Manhattan project, this time focused on bringing the weight of government spending to bear on innovative energy technology, resulting in homegrown ways to provide inexpensive transportation, heating and air conditioning for all, and to end the threat of global warming while continuing to grow the economy. Inexpensive, clean energy would increase the standard of living of middle class Americans enormously.

|
26 Comments:
Yes! But may I rearrange 4, 6, 3, 7, 8, 1, 9... 5, 2 your priprities?
End the war, tear up the PATRIOT Act and reinstall the Bill of Rights, at long last capture bin Laden, stop the war crimes, put our finances back in order, fix the intelligence apparatus, stop our headlong rush to the end of the world...
And prosecute the criminals in this regime who have sold us all down the river... and last but not least, most important in fact, fix our broken system of government.
So let's get some people on the ballot, and we've forgotten that our ballots are broken and need fixing as well, Republicans, Democrats, Greens, or None of the Above who espouse those values and run on them.
It reads like a modern-day bill of basic rights. And an honest plea to end to the politics of deception. Well done.
Id sign to that.
Not even a reference to, putting it mildly, a reconsideration of Israel-Palestine policy?
It all sounds very appealing. I would be very interested in any candidiate with this as a platform.
One thing, though.
This
The necessary political and military arrangements will be made to give the Iraqis a fighting chance of establishing stability on their own,...
is quite a bit of handwaving, don;t you think? Far easier said than done. I think that the Dmocrats already have too many problems with offering lofty policy generalities nd no specifics.
I would rather see a commitment to something real, even if it turned out not to work.
What about health insurance for all Americans?
No mention of integrity of the ballot box.
Please consider proposals that don't vilify. omit specifics, or ignore consequences.
1. Make it easier to obtain indictments against --- Republicans only? Shouldn’t there be indictments only where evidence is very strong? Be careful what you wish for. A strong penalty for any leaks “injurious to national security” could also be used to terrify or incarcerate whistleblowers or any casual mention that someone is affiliated with national defense.
2. Hard to take money out of politics, since government is such a big payer and payee and because it costs a fortune to run for office. One person’s “dirty money” is another’s due consideration. Do PACs and lobbies give money as a neutral public service?. Is teacher union money less biased or tainted than NRA money?
3. Too long to capture Usamah? OK. So suppose he is in any of six possible areas of Pakistan. What to do about it?
4. Best to reduce US presence in Iraq? Bush people will argue that an ASAP reduction is already under way, with a very visible >10% “redeployment” certain to occur by the November elections. But various AEI people argue that until Iraqi forces show greater resolve (and don’t hold your breath), US forces will remain the backbone of counterinsurgency. Is is better to be damned if you do, or damned if you don't?
5. To “establish by law a panel of lifetime appointees to review intelligence for the president and congress”? This would probably be unconstitutional, since you present “review” as a power tantamount to veto or to the ability to indict alleged abuse. Intelligence involves postulating outcomes based on limited or obscure information. This makes intelligence failure inevitable. Fear of punishment for error would simply assure reports that are absolutely bland, so neutered as to be useless. For instance, it would make it impossible to prosecute measures to fulfill #3. And imagine how the panel would be staffed or stacked! Any appointees to such a panel would probably be vetted precisely on how well the could be relied upon to nod or snooze.
6. Abolish warantless searches? The key hurdle is the NSA wiretaps driven by algorithms that pick up thousands of phone calls based on locations and phone numbers, where there is only a scanty hunch about possible cause for concern. 99% are probably irrelevant, dead ends, or ambiguous “chatter.” It is a needle in a field of haystacks dilemma. Would this pass any judicial hurdle?
7. Require due process and right of trial for terror suspects detained anywhere? Think of all the 1,000s of insurgent suspects detained in sweeps. How about jails staffed or run by Iraqis subject to Occupation authority? Would this lead to prosecution of any US soldier or president for “unjust imprisonment” of whomever? Maybe 80% of the “Gitmo” detainees plead innocence, say they were in Afghanistan on sightseeing tour, and (wisely) claim no ill intent. Maybe another 15% swear allegiance to jihad (however defined) or belief in martyrdom, but present no evidence of violent action. But if you release that 95%, and any one participates in a new attack, what happens to the person who signed the release papers?
8. Abolish the Alternative Minimum Tax only if you find something to replace it. After all, there is a big fiscal deficit and a larger “structural” or NPV deficit if one measures future obligations against future revenues. Trouble is, it is almost impossible to win election if you support any tax whatever. Truth be known, those paying the ATM would probably have to pay more, rather than less, to narrow our deficits.
9. Green energy to curtail America's dangerous dependence on foreign oil? Fermi and the original Manhattan Project unveiled a CO2 neutral energy source which we remain reluctant to develop or let others develop. Ethanol production and use has its own atmospheric consequences. Will Americans OK construction of more reactors in their towns? High oil prices, coupled with a European style oil tax, are probably the most effective inducements to economize and find alternatives but also gut a cherished culture built around disbursed suburban McMansions and malls. It is hard to put air conditioning on the list of universal rights, since it intrinsically uses lots of energy
These are excellent and well-stated positions we can all agree with. But can they be distilled down to simpler and shorter sentences, given the well-known short attention span of American voters?
These are excellent and well-stated positions that we can all agree with. But can they be distilled down to simpler and shorter sentences, given the well-known short attention span of American voters?
That's great. The only thing I would add is voting reform. Paper trails on all voting machines and strict federal standards on how elections are to be conducted. As it is there's not guarantee that the next election won't be "influenced" like the last two were.
If you'd like to make it an even ten, how about an anti-gerrymandering plan? Maybe something that would end the dominance of the two party system.
Reword the last part of #2. Other than that, A+++, strongly recommend.
I'd stop at #4, or maybe move #9 up to #5 and adopt the idea of "inventing our way out of this crisis" by the strength of American ingenuity.
Most Democratic idea plans seem to have around 10 points, but frankly, I think it dilutes them and challenges people's attention spans.
After the first 5 points, I'd just add a "P.S. We will go back to observing the constitution (no unlawful signing statements) and bill of rights (no wiretapping, no torture)and no longer work to destroy effective government programs (like FEMA or SS/Medicare)... but you knew that."
Are you running for office or someting?
Hooray for you Dr. Cole.
I opposed the Iraqi invasion and occupation, and have always been keenly interested in the integrity and security of my country. This blog has been a frequently read source. You've provided not only the links to important news stories but a context for understanding their importance. Thank you.
For this valuable service you've been the target of slings and arrows. It's silly really, but as I read my daily newspaper I flinch every time--which is almost every day--I read "Bush-hater." It always feels like a personal insult. How much more painful for you to be genuinely attacked.
You speak truth to power and suffer the consequences. What I can say is that I'm enormously grateful and very proud of you,a true American patriot.
I am always fed by your words and insight and today was a feast.
I belive it is time for the American people to craft a mission statement that might reflect our current consciousness of and dreams for progressive values for a healthy planet and her people.
I love your first draft.
I love this first draft.
It is time for us to carve and craft a new American mission statement. One that might reflect the better consciousness of human values .. of nurturance and sustainability and peace for all the people of this fragile planet.
Sounds like a solid platform. My only real beef is with the energy proposal. Rather than the government throwing huge sums of money at specific technologies, I would prefer higher gas/energy/carbon taxes. Let's price things right and give the market a chance to figure things out.
I would recommend reading David Brin's version -- riffing off of the Republican Contract With America
http://www.davidbrin.com/contract.html
I think it addresses many of the same things, but on less specific terms.
Here's a question for anyone who still doubts that a hasty US withdrawal from Iraq is required:
Looking back now, can you deny that a US pullout one year ago would have been better than what we have seen, and continue to see today?
Fantastic!!!
This sounds like the "old" US, which we all love!
Looks good, but let's state the following:
The covenant will include a declaration of basic human rights and principles that will include 1. access to education for all, 2. access to health care for all, 3. a living wage for all.
In general, if we stand by the reassertion of the principles of justice as articulated here by Professor Cole, then the problem of national security may well be fixed by itself.
which representative will spearhead a redirection of our mid-east policy? or how might one with an equitable platform be elected? And not by a skimpy margin?
For the last 9 days i drove around at 60miles/hr with a crude slogan on driver side window of my car, "Lincoln 2008".
One kid in cornell where I went to visit my kid asked about it, which gave me an occasion to point out the impossibility of my agenda, a short way to say our electoral system is broken. Either, 1, there's no Lincoln (think alike)--for if there were any s/he would have elected him/herself; 2, but if there were one, s/he would not be able to succeed given our completely outdated, inadequate, totally abused electoral system. S/he needs first be a great fundraiser (which maynot have any thing to do with being a good prez), and as a consequence, becomes beholden to special interest donors, then, after the fund is collected, s/he would have to utilize the trick of tv sound-bites to be elected, being the honest Abe he probably would not be able to bring himself to.
But i'm totally serious about the need of a Lincoln. Our country is in a more perilous situation than ever before. So what is the answer? We need to update the whole practical side of our governing system: how to select our public servants (in name as well as in reality), and how to organize the business of the government.
With every one I talked to, the common concern is the money influence. Why not retire money from election completely? I thought of an idea, and amazingly, after a little prompt, a coworker came up with the same idea. I want to see how every one else is feeling first. Any need for a radical departure toward a true government of and by the people?
I think you are fundamentally talking about a politics of common good. I think you'll find the American Prospect article, "The Politics of Definition, Part IV" to be right in line with your thinking.
It creates a basic lens through which to consider all policy. Your covenant is exactly in line with that lens, especially your line about the middle class having the choice to shoulder the burden of recovery or not.
Amen!
Post a Comment
<< Home