Evacuation of Westerners from Lebanon
Why are We the Story?
Patrick McGreevy writes from Beirut:
' Why Are We the Story?
We woke up this morning to a crowded sea. From our Beirut balcony, we could see a steady parade of warships, ferries, cruise ships, helicopter ships, and one aircraft carrier. Helicopters ferried evacuees to the aircraft carrier, and it eventually disappeared to the west. Back and forth, all day, the ships steamed between Beirut and Cyprus. There had been many complaints about the efficiency of the evacuation, but it seems that sufficient resources and will is finally producing results. Tens of thousands are relieved to be getting out.
The use of the term “refugee” caused controversy when it was applied to those driven from their homes by Hurricane Katrina last September, but, in the current war, only the lucky get to be refugees. Unlike the Katrina victims, they actually do cross an international border; they also must pass through a military blockade. About 1500 Lebanese lined up yesterday to renew their passports or obtain new ones so that they could leave Lebanon; the scene at the General Security headquarters in Beirut was ugly. As citizens of a country under attack by Israeli forces, they will hardly be able to pierce the naval blockade, so their only option is a land route to Syria.
Most Lebanese are not lucky enough to be refugees. They will have to cope with living in a war zone. About 500,000 are even less likely—they have been driven from their homes in southern Lebanon and Beirut’s southern suburbs, a Katrina-like catastrophe in a country without the resources of the United States, during an ongoing war and blockade.
Domestic workers from developing countries also face a situation very different from that of North American and European citizens. These are mostly unmarried women from Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Ghana, and other countries. Leaving Lebanon for the Philippines, for example, means finding yourself back where you started without a job and facing a very expensive return trip in order work again. Hence the Daily Star reported today that only 1000 of the 30,000 Filipinos have requested to leave Lebanon, and only 5,000 of the 90,000 Sri Lankans. Moreover, some who wish to leave, cannot because their sponsors themselves have fled and left them without papers.
The western media has been focused like a laser on the dramatic story of the evacuation of refugees from western countries. The Americans I know who are on their way out all have the same question: Why are we the story? With hundreds dead, thousands injured, hundreds of thousands displaced, Lebanon essentially turned into a Gaza with mountains, and the Bush Administration saying that talk of a cease-fire is “premature,” can we ever expect the western media to report what is significant rather than what will entertain its audience?
Patrick McGreevy '


4 Comments:
Talking of the media missing stories, did you see Patrick Cockburn's article from Iraq today?
Baghdad has survived the Iran-Iraq war, the 1991 Gulf War, UN sanctions, more bombing and, finally, a savage guerrilla war. Now the city is finally splitting apart, and - most surprising of all - this disaster scarcely gets a mention on the news as the world watches the destruction of Beirut so many miles away.
It's all such a long way from Bush and Blair's promise that the invasion of Iraq would help stabilise the Middle East. Tragic.
When 9/11 ocurred our nation took the position that the entire rest of the world faced two options, "to be with us or against us". The events of 9/11 justified two wars and countless force based "anti-terrorist" actions and policies.
Yet the destruction of Lebanon in retalliation for the killing of eight Israeli soldiers and abduction of two others is considered an unpleasant but inevitable consequence.
The notion that Lebanon would be justified in declaring war against Israel, or even declaring that it has "a right to defend itself", would be laughed off by the Whitehouse, congress, and American punditry. The correct attitude for the Lebonese to take in response to the death and destruction is to employ their legendary resilience to rebuild and go on with their lives. Certainly not to obsess about a trivial bump in the road.
When the dust of destruction settles and the mass graves are covered, our Government's main preoccupation will be the security of Israel, not its anhilliation of much of Lebenon's infrastructure and the rekindling of the internal hostilities that led to fifteen years of civil war.
In a nutshell we have no empathy for those who are not clearly in the "with us" column, and they know it.
I'm very relieved to have found this—the link will be appearing on my blog today. Would that our world leaders possessed the same level of sanity as this gentleman Mr. Cole.
Unfortunately, the discourse, both amid world leaders and in the mass media, falls far short of the standards of diplomacy. Last week, I was referred to as a "Nazi," a KKK wannabee, and a Hezbollah-lover, because of a remark I made at Daily Revolution about the Israeli government (a remark which was seconded, apparently, by none other than Condi herself). Mind you, the attack came not from some anonymous zealot on the Comments board, but from a personal acquaintance of mine. I'm not going to name him, because that would be an unfair use of this public space, and a continuance of the cult of warfare that has infected our dialogue here at home as a pall of death spreads over the planet.
But I want to submit that if we panic now, we are doomed. Our children will inherit a wasteland Earth; the desolation will, most likely, be irremediable. We have heard the voices of panic: they are those that have spoken of an Axis of Evil; those that pointed to little marks on a Google Earth picture and said, "WMDs"; and now we are hearing from Panic in the form of a call for the execution of the editor of the Times.
This is not a time for cheerleaders, chickenhawks, and hucksters for destruction. But how you can support the survival of the Lebanese government (as Bush claimed to at the G8) by supporting the destruction of its capital is yet another example of the truly decompensatory strain of U.S. foreign policy under the stewardship of the Cheney hegemony.
So this all started with Hezbollah rockets going into Israel? There's no shortage of Israeli apologists chanting that mantra. As always, they rely on people having short memories. I remember Israeli phosphorous bombs falling on Beirut in the early 80's, for instance. Some of them,notoriously at the time, killed people in a hospital. I am not making this up and anyone who cared to check it will find that even Ronald Reagan, yes, Ronald Reagan condemned the Israeli actions. Although, like his successors of today he was prepared to turn a blind eye to the mass murder by Israel which went on for months before the phosphorous incidents. I am well aware that anyone can start to take the atrocities back into deep history. All I am saying is that the claim that Hizbollah, who came into existence to drive the Israelis out of Lebanon, which they did, started this. An insult to the intelligence of everyone, even by White House press release standards (not that the MSM don't lift the releases virtually verbatim). Strength to your bow, Juan.
Post a Comment
<< Home