Bush v. Ahmadinejad
Egypt's Jamal Mubarak Rejects "New Middle East"
Announces Nuclear Quest
The speeches given at the UN by US President George W. Bush and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were mirror images of one another.
Bush accused Iran of seeking nuclear weapons and of supporting terrorism.
Ahmadinejad said that his own country's nuclear research program is purely civilian and that Iran is not seeking a bomb and remains committed to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. But he said that the real threat anyway was from countries that already possessed nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, and who insisted on continually increasing their stockpiles of these weapons and their sophistication. What, he asked, do they intend to do with these ever expanding arsenals? Why do they need them?
Bush said that the problem in the Middle East is authoritarian government, which breeds despair and terrorism.
Ahmadinejad said that the problem in the Middle East is the meddling in its affairs of a neo-imperialist power, which worked by dividing and ruling.
Bush said that Afghanistan and Iraq were great success stories and beacons of democracy.
Ahmadinejad said that Iraq is a mess and that he suspects that the US is deliberately keeping it that way so as to have a pretext to stay and dominate it. He said that Iraqi forces turned captured terrorists over to the US, but that the US often just released them after a few months.
Bush said Saudi Arabia's municipal elections were a step toward democracy. (Only half of the municipal councils are elected, the other half are appointed by the monarchy, as are the mayors).
Iran, for all the substantial faults of its electoral system, is far more democratic than Saudi Arabia.
Bush said that the Lebanon war came out of an unprovoked attack on Israel by Hizbullah.
Ahmadinejad said an aggressive Israel was a constant source of instability in the region.
But it is clear which speech resonated best in the Middle East itself, where Bush is extremely unpopular and deeply distrusted. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, Jamal Mubarak of Egypt paid a very sincere compliment to Ahmadinejad Tuesday.
While Bush and Ahmadinejad were wrangling, Egypt's Jamal Mubarak unexpectedly entered the arena. He is the son and likely successor of President Hosni Mubarak.
Bush did not mention Egypt in his speech, but it is a soft military dictatorship in which the liveliest challenger to the government is the Muslim Brotherhood, which has authoritarian Islamist tendencies. Egypt is a close US military ally and receives $2 bn a year in US aid.
Jamal Mubarak announced that Egypt is trying to fill its energy gap with nuclear power plants. It was the first public admission that Egypt has a civilian nuclear powere research program. He said that the question of energy is pivotal to his country's economic development. (Egypt has had a small and desultory nuclear energy research program for many years, and has been criticized by the IAEA for trying to hide it.)
He rejected the "Greater Middle East" plan for Iraq of the Bush administration, which Washington says involves democratization but which many Middle Easterners view as a pretext for US dominance of the region. Jamal Mubarak said, "We do not accept initiatives that come to us every day from outside."
For more see New York Times reporting on the issue.
Even Bush's friends in the region are imitating Ahmadinejad.

|
5 Comments:
From the Guardian's article on the speech:
[GWB] expressed his desire for a world in which... "the extremists are marginalised by the peaceful majority".
Yes, I miss the good old days here, too.
In the Sunni/Shiite hysteria that is sweeping the West, two points are being overlooked: 1 - Egypt and Iran are not natural enemies. Ahmadinejad and Nasrallah, both Shiites are more popular in Egypt than Hosni Mubarak. Egyptians are among the most favorable people in the world to the idea of Iran having nuclear weapons and only a very small percentage of Egyptians consider Iran a major threat to peace. 2 - If Mubarak was seen as standing up the the Americans, he would do much better against, and may be able to beat, the Muslim Brotherhood in polls. He would also be in a better position to work with them should they get substantial political power. Mubarak is unpopular largely because of his lack of spine in standing up to the United States and Israel.
Egypt does not switch camps because of inertia and because the US still has more cash, capital and technology than Iran. As that changes, and US policy (such as "birth pangs" and support for Israel) makes alliance more expensive in terms of popular support and self respect, Egypt and also Jordan and Saudi Arabia are going to switch sides. It's just a matter of when, and Iran has plenty of time to wait as it is not under direct threat.
Be sure to check out Time Magazine's interview with Ahmadinejad.
TIME: You have been quoted as saying Israel should be wiped off the map. Was that merely rhetoric, or do you mean it?
Ahmadinejad: People in the world are free to think the way they wish. We do not insist they should change their views. Our position toward the Palestinian question is clear: we say that a nation has been displaced from its own land. Palestinian people are killed in their own lands, by those who are not original inhabitants, and they have come from far areas of the world and have occupied those homes. Our suggestion is that the 5 million Palestinian refugees come back to their homes, and then the entire people on those lands hold a referendum and choose their own system of government. This is a democratic and popular way. Do you have any other suggestions?
it's a small point, but it has me puzzled.
i thought the arabic 'J" was an Egyptian "G"
hence not Jamal but Gamal Abd"al'Nassar
but now we have Jamal Mu'barak
What has changed?
Best Wishes?
I see now in an Israeli paper that it is Gamal. I see from his pix is that he don't have his father's nose- don't look like him at all.
What's going on probably is that the arabic spelling is the same. Those that know Egyptian will put it in English as Gamal, otherwise those familiar with Lebanese or Gulf Arabic will write it as Jamal.
Best Wishes
Post a Comment
<< Home