Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, October 30, 2006

Sadr City Bombing on Monday Kills 29, wounds 60
At Least 83 Killed Sunday
In Basra, Bombers target Police


Sunni Arab guerrillas killed a US Marine on Sunday, bringing to 100 the death toll for US troops in Iraq during the month of October. It is one of the deadliest months since the war began.

An enormous bomb blasted a city square in Sadr City, the Shiite slum of northeast Baghdad on Monday morning, killing 29 and wounding 60. The victims were poor day laborers lining up in search of work.

On Sunday, hundreds (some reports say thousands) of angry residents had demonstrated against the US military siege of Sadr City, threatening to close down the ministries if it is not lifted. Iraqi members of parliament from the Shiite United Iraqi Alliance joined them. They complained that as a result of the US operations, ordinary people cannot circulate and it is difficult to get patients to the hospitals. The situation was therefore already at the boiling point before the bombing, which will have made things worse.

The inhabitants of Sadr City, with a population of perhaps 3 million, maintain that they do not have the captured US soldier, and say they are upset at the 5-day long siege of their district by the US military, which is alleged to have closed off most routes from Sadr City into Baghdad and to have been engaged in invading offices of clerics associated with the Mahdi Army of Muqtada al-Sadr. Apparently they believe that a unit of the Mahdi Army kidnapped a GI, for whom they are conducting a manhunt. The US is seeking rogue guerrilla commander Abu Deraa, who has broken with Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Baghdad government officials announced Sunday that they had discovered 25 dead bodies in the capital over the previous 24 hours.

Guerrillas kiled 5 policemen in Baquba.

US troops killed 17 guerrillas near Balad on Sunday. The US military said that the guerrillas were planning to attack a US convoy.

Altogether guerrillas killed 33 policemen on Sunday. In Basra, armed men pulled 17 police trainees and 2 translators out of a van and their dead bodies were later found around the city. In Basra, such actions are frequently taken by Shiite militias or Marsh Arab tribsemen, though there have been allegations that Sunni Arab death squads operate there, funded by fundamentalist Sunnis in the Gulf.

Iraq's Sunni Arab vice president is threatening to resign if Prime Minister al-Maliki does not confront head on the problem of dissolving the Badr Corps and the Mahdi Army, Shiite militias. Such a move by Tariq al-Hashimi could well signal the end of the Maliki "national unity" government.

Constant mortar attacks have forced the British to abandon their consulate in downtown Basra.

The US military has lost track of hundreds of thousands of weapons the US purchased for the Iraqi military and security forces. The only good news in the article is that many of the weapons are useless to Iraqis because of lack of spare parts or difficulty of upkeep. At least those won't do the guerrillas any good if they fall into their hands.

Trudy Rubin of the Philadelphia Inquirer asks some good questions about how the Bush administration squandered most of the $18 billion that Congress ear-marked for Iraq reconstruction and whether there will be any accountability.

And speaking of accountability, here is a site that tracks what Congress has been doing to our Constitutional right of habeas corpus.

5 Comments:

At 4:44 AM, Blogger Frank said...

Dear Professor Cole

I find the Trudy Rubin piece the most relevant of these.

Dusseldorf along with many other European Cities keeps a Gedaechtniskirche which stands in ruins as a memorial to the Second European Civil War.

As the incomplete KBR and Parsons jobs symbolise so much of the failed Iraq adventure there is room to keep at least one of them in the state it was in when the money ran out.

As the place will be somebody elses problem after the Imperial Legions depart there is no point in trying to organise a reconstruction conference.

What can be done however is to avoid tangling up the new Iraqi government in the horror of US Corporate Lawsuits about abandoned resources, followed by court orders and injunctions and frozen assets.

Part of the evacuation plan will involve writing off the value of Turbines and major plant that gets left behind.

There is a case to be made that the Iranians will be the people who provide the funding for reconstruction as part of Greater Iran. There may be a case to consider unfreezing the assets seized by the US 25 years ago and returning them with suitable interest payments and earmarking some of this for a reconstruction fund.

As it will take a year for the situation to settle down after the Long Drive to Kuwait, this can be a topic of debate leading into the presidential campaign.

 
At 8:57 AM, Blogger Arnold Evans said...

The US has wanted to clamp down on Sadr City for months, but permission has been withheld by the government.

Maybe the US really believes the soldier is there, but it is just as likely that the US is using the possibility that he may be there to perform the clamp down they would want to do without any missing soldier.

A little like closing Beirut airport and Lebanon's bridges had little or nothing to do with retrieving those captured soldiers, locking down Sadr City probably is not directly related to this soldier search.

But the first major bombing in a while happening during the clampdown is bad business for US-Shiite relations in Iraq, if those relations can still get worse.

 
At 9:54 AM, Blogger Dansker2006 said...

Prof Cole

Interesting development about the kidnapped US soldier. According to the
NY Times
he is an Iraqi interpreter who three months ago married a local Iraqi college student. He was kidnapped while visiting his bride outside of the Green Zone.

 
At 12:57 PM, Blogger The Buffalo In The Midst said...

Professor Cole: "The US military has lost track of hundreds of thousands of weapons the US purchased for the Iraqi military and security forces. The only good news in the article is that many of the weapons are useless to Iraqis because of lack of spare parts or difficulty of upkeep. At least those won't do the guerrillas any good if they fall into their hands.

This is an ongoing story that broke a month or two ago. I posted my thoughts on the subject to a listserv I frequent, excerpt follows:

Subject: US can't account for some (hundreds of thousands) weapons for Iraqi army

Some...

"It also said it could not find evidence that coalition forces had complied with a U.S. requirement to register the serial numbers of all small arms, a key concern "given the importance of controlling these sensitive items -- particularly given the security environment in Iraq.""

Gotta love the simplistic assumption that these weapons ever saw Iraqi soil.
Unlikely.

This is probably related to a story about a few months back about missing weapons handled by an outfit from... Bosnia, I believe.

I wonder how many will filter back to the neo-nazi/rascist element in the US via American paramilitary and 'contractor' types working the former-Yugoslavian theater of operations. I hear the money's good and the under-age girls from this bombed out region are easy.

Reuters
US can't account for some weapons for Iraqi army
Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:26 AM ET
Reuters Story Link

 
At 6:05 PM, Blogger John Francis Lee said...

" On Sunday, hundreds (some reports say thousands) of angry residents had demonstrated against the US military siege of Sadr City, threatening to close down the ministries if it is not lifted... "

Poll after poll shows that the Iraqi people want US and other foreign occupiers out of Iraq, by overwhelming margins.

What do I read from the compradors of the US puppet government government this morning?

"Iraq is to ask the UN Security Council to renew the mandate governing the presence of US-led forces in the country for another year, said Hoshiyar Zebari, its foreign minister."

Is it true that these traitors to Iraq are going to turn over Iraq's oilfields to the US "multinationals" before the end of the year?

"The real, not virtual, future of Iraq will be decided in December. The whole point is a new oil law - which is in fact a debt-for-oil program concocted and imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This is the point of the US invasion - a return on investment on the hundreds of billions of dollars of US taxpayers' money spent. It's not war as politics by other means; it's war as free-market opening by other means - full US access to the epicenter of the energy wars and the perfect geostrategic location for "taming", in the near future, both Russia and China.

Very few observers have detailed what's at stake. In US corporate media the silence is stratospheric.
"

 

Post a Comment

<< Home