Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, April 15, 2007

289 Iraqis Killed or Wounded in Day of Rage
Four Killed in Karbala Demonstration


McClatchy estimates that 289 Iraqis were killed or wounded in political violence on Saturday. This passage is extremely important to understanding the sentiments of the Shiites of the South, among the main victims of the violence:


' Aqeel al Khazaali, the governor of Karbala, blamed the Baghdad Security Plan for the attack inside the relatively safe southern city. Karbala is about 50 miles south of Baghdad. "The Baghdad crackdown and the tribes in Ramadi are forcing the terrorists to leave their cities," he said. "Now Karbala is under fire from terrorists, and the central government has to take the necessary steps to help us to protect the holy city." '


The destabilizing character of this assault on the city of the Prophet's Grandson is seen in that many residents blamed the elected governor for not ensuring security-- such that a big crowd rioted in protest. The crowd is said to have marched on the governor's mansion and surrounded it, demanding his resignation, and set two police cars afire. They accused the United States of having had a hand in the bombing. Nothing could be more dangerous to the position of the US in Iraq than to have it believed that it had anything to do with a massive bombing near the shrine of Imam Husayn. (It is a ridiculous allegation, but will be believed by the more disgruntled Shiites.)

Iraqi press sources say that Karbala police fired on the rioters and killed four. Ayatollah Muhammad Taqi Mudarrisi, the leading clerical authority in Karbala, has called for an investigation into the shootings, according to this Arabic article. He criticized the police for lack of self-discipline at a perilous time, and warned against attempt to foment Shiite on Shiite violence and social turmoil (fitnah).

Iran is offering aid to the beleaguered Shiite holy city.

There were a number of other violent incidents on Saturday, in addition to the massive early morning bombings at Karbala and near the Jadiriya bridge in Baghdad, which together left dozens dead. (Al-Hayat speculated in Arabic that the Jadiriya bomber had tried but failed to hit the bridge itself, thus further isolating one part of the capital from another.)

Police found 20 bodies in Baghdad on Saturday. Typically such corpses are victims of sectarian death squads.

Guerrillas attacked the convoy of the deputy Minister of Industry and wounded 3 of his bodyguards in the Jihad district of southwest Baghdad. The deputy minister was unscathed.

Guerrillas also attacked the home of Sunni fundamentalist member of parliament Adnad al-Dulaimi, wounding 6 of his guards. He himself is abroad, presumably in Amman.

The attacks come on the heels of the bombing of the Iraqi parliament, which in the end killed one parliamentarian, Muhammad Awadh. There were other bombing and mortar attacks in the capital.

Elsewhere in Baquba to the northeast, guerrillas deployed a roadside bomb to kill 3 policemen and wound 8 others.

Likewise, in Baiji north of the capital, a suicide car bomber killed 5 Iraqi soldiers and wounded 4 others.

In Mosul, police found 4 bodies.

Two British servicemen were killed and 5 wounded when two military helicopters collided just north of Baghdad.

Radical Salafi Jihadis of the "Islamic State in Iraq" say that they have captured 20 Ministry of Interior security men and are holding them ransom for the release of Sunni Arab women in Iraqi government custody. They claim that (Shiite) government security forces have raped a Sunni Arab woman and are also demanding the surrender of the released rapists.

In Baghdad, al-Hayat says that a group of Iraqi parliamentarians held a conference to announce the formation of the "Provisional Command of the Southern Region," comprising Basra, Dhi Qar and Maysan provinces. The politicians said that most blocs in parliament agreed with the establishment of such a provincial confederacy. [140 MPs voted to expedite this process last October.] Other blocs, such as the Sunni Arabs and the Sadrists, fear that such regional federations will lead to the breakup of the country. (Maysan's agreement is a little odd in this regard, since it is dominated by Sadrists . . .)

British troops killed 8 militiamen caught laying mines in the southern Shiite port city of Basra. Some observers reported that the slain bombers had been members of the Mahdi Army of Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that there were calls after Friday prayers in Basra for a massive demonstration there on Monday. Some say it was called by the Sadr Movement as a way of rattling the governor of Basra, Muhammad Misbah al-Wa'ili, who belongs to the rival Islamic Virtue Party. Militias of the two parties clashed not long ago.

The remaining 1300 South Korean troops in northern Iraq will be withdrawn, Seoul says. Their presence in Iraq is highly controversial back home.

The United States appointed the Iyad Allawi government in June of 2004, a heavily CIA-influenced regime with a strong anti-Iran, anti-Shiite orientation. It established an Iraqi National Intelligence Service in which ex-Baathists were prominent, and they detained Shiite activists. The Shiite governments since elected do not like or trust the INIS, and so Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has developed his own, Shiite intelligence service under the Minister of State for National Security. Ned Parker of the LAT examines the consequent contradictions and potential for internal conflict.

Easy to get hurt fighting for your country. Hard to get personal attention afterwards.

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 10:24 AM, Blogger Xan said...

Minor correction: the CNN story you link to on the two-helicopters-colliding story says that the dead (and injured) soldiers were British, not "GIs".

Which of course raises the question of what British troops were doing up around Taji in such numbers, but we never seem to get much in the way of detail about helicopter crashes anymore. Other than assurance that it was "not due to hostile fire" of course.

 
At 11:31 AM, Blogger Vigilante said...

Where am I wrong on this?

It seems to me that Iran was a natural ally for the United States from the beginning of our response to 9-11 attacks.

Now, it also seems to me that Iran's and Iraqi Shiites are the natural allies available to assist us in untangling ourselves from Bush's Iraq-nam. Al Qaeda is the fruit of Wahabis, Radical Salafi Jihadis of the "Islamic State in Iraq", etc.

And the reason why we cannot tilt toward Shiites, against the Sunnis in Iraq, is that it would favors Iran. Favoring Iran, disfavors Israel.

Israel has a right to exist; but its policies on the West Bank have turned a purported ally into an albatross.

 
At 11:52 AM, Blogger Peter Attwood said...

It's worth remembering that Americans fighting in Iraq are not fighting for their country, if their country is understood as the constitutional republic established in 1789. They're fighting for the success of lawless imperialism, contrary to their oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, at a moment when the only effective enemies of that constitution are domestic.

The only hope for the American republic - and there isn't much -is a humiliating defeat in Iraq and in all other such imperial ventures. Thus Japan was saved from its militarists, Germany was saved from the Nazis, Argentina was saved in 1981 from its military dictatorship, and Greece was saved in 1974 from the colonels' dictatorship.

 
At 12:02 PM, Blogger Vigilante said...

One more thing:

I have satisfied myself that the Anglo-American invasion or Iraq was illegal by the standards of international law.

But I haven't understood the legality of the Anglo-American occupation from the standpoint of international law. There is some kind of U.N. 'Sanction' which purports to require us to take steps to minimize the collateral effects on Iraqi citizens and infrastructure of our unnecessary and unprovoked aggression.

Professor Cole, could you publish (if you haven't already) on this issue?

 
At 12:10 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

When the American occupation army, withdrew ~ for all intents and purposes, from greater IRAQ ~ and collapsed into centre city Baghdad, their Officer Corps must have known that far weaker fellow British forces down-river, and Kurdish para-militias up-river would both be transformed from fragile flanks to de facto front-lines. If rank amateurs, such as we can look at a map of IRAQ and see this reality a priori then, surely any senior staff officer so assigned or scholar of military history at the Academy could have advised the civilian/ political leaders of America and Great Britain, "Don't do this."

Don't transfer the ‘insurgency’ = resistance to the occupation to your fragile flanks, while inserting your own forces squarely in the middle of an entirely different conflict, a civil war in the greater metropolis...

...for any attempt by the Kurds to become active rather than passive position/ peace-keepers will surely be met by the Turks; and another great vacuum left by what has always been a symbolic British presence down south, now in full retreat, will only suck in IRAN, as if it, too were some hitherto contained mass being inexorably drawn to this new, low-pressure area on an obvious geo-political weather map.

imho, it is the breathtaking inevitability of what is happening now, that gives us this sensation that we are watching their train wreck unfolding in slow motion; all the while wondering: “Why the hell would any Officer Corps waste their own forces and scarce resources in such obvious folly?"

 
At 12:30 PM, Blogger danh said...

You wrote:

Two US GIs were killed and 5 wounded when two helicopters collided just north of Baghdad.

----

From everything I have read today, including the article you link to, it was two British soldiers who were killed in the dual helicopter incident.

Great reporting, however, as usual. I look to your blog as the primary source of my Iraq news.

 
At 1:57 PM, Blogger CRIMES AND CORRUPTION OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER NEWS mparent7777 Marc Parent CCNWON said...

Jadiriya bridge bombing is not what it seems.

Al-Sarafya Bridge wasn’t destroyed by a trapped lorry but it had been trapped
Saturday, 14 April 2007

As our agency expected during the news of destroying al-Sarafia irony Bridge one of the most Baghdad famous traditional areas were destroying the Bridge wasn’t by a trapped lorry as the governmental sources said when they announced the explosion news

 

Post a Comment

<< Home