Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Monday, May 07, 2007

Can Sarkozy Uphold the Values of 1789?

Rightwing nationalist Nicolas Sarkozy, is the next president of France. He campaigned on an anti-immigrant platform that veered uncomfortably close to that of Jean-Marie LePen, though he did make a provision for affirmative action. Sarkozy will try to break the unions, and his view of the immigrants who rioted in 2005 over joblessness as "scum" bodes ill for social peace. An Arab blogger's view of Sarkozy's police tactics is eye-opening.

Sarkozy's message, that he wants to restore pride in Frenchness, wants to promote free market reforms, and worries that France has lost control of its borders all sounds Reaganesque. Just as Reaganism was a form of American ("white") nationalism, so Sarkozyism is a form of French nationalism. And just as Reagan's nationalism had a class location in the upper middle classes and the rich, so too does Sarkozy's "French" nationalism.

But the United States and France are both founded on civic nationalism (open to everyone of any race or culture), not on ethnic nationalism. While Germany's laws allowed persons of German heritage and language resident in eastern Europe and Central Asia under Communist rule to come to Germany as citizens after the fall of the Soviet Union, the United States would hardly make a law allowing English-speakers to immigrate at will. Citizenship in the US is open to all ethnicities and is about allegiance to the Constitution. The revolutionary ideal of France is similarly civic. The Republican French thought nothing of bestowing citizenship on some provinces of Senegal and actually allowing them to elect deputies to the French national assembly. French citizenship was never about race, about "Français de souche." But I worry that Sarkozy's trajectory is to privilege that kind of narrow Frenchness.

Sarkozy's French nationalism (he uses the French equivalent of "France: Love it or leave it!"-- a sentiment pioneered by LePen) will clash with the realities of French multiculturalism. France's Muslims are estimated at anywhere from 4 million on up, but I favor the 4 million figure (the population of metropolitan France is about 60 million, so this is 6.6 percent).

The Muslims are only one immigrant group. There are thought to be 14 million French of immigrant origins (over the past century?)-- including 100,000 Britons. The biggest group is the Portuguese.

Sarkozy intends to create an Orwellian "Ministry of Immigration and National Identity." He rubbed the practicing Muslims the wrong way when he came out in favor of the Danish caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, and he supported banning the headscarf for Muslim school girls.

Although it is often said that Sarkozy played a positive role in insisting that French Muslims form a Muslim Council and develop a "French Islam," it is often forgotten that the council ended up being dominated by first-generation immigrants out of touch with French Muslims (many of whom are third or fourth generation), and by conservative religious groups--the "National Federation of Muslims in France (FNMF) and the Union of Islamic Organizations in France (UOIF)." Sarkozy himself is said to have favored the UOIF, which is to say the least made up of hardliners. One suspects that he was attempting to set up religous Muslims as a force in rightwing politics in France, on the model of the practicing Roman Catholics. (About 18 percent of the French are practicing Roman Catholics; most of these congregations have tended to vote Gaullist. Some 45 percent of practicing Catholics voted in the first round for Sarkozy, with only 11 percent voting Socialist. The rest must have voted for the centrist candidate, Francois Bayrou [or as a reader reminded me, LePen, who got 10% in the first round].)

Ironically, Sarkozy may have succeeded in setting up a rightwing Muslim Council, but failed to attract its loyalty to himself, given his subsequent record of anti-immigrant rhetoric and his positions on cultural issues important to Muslims.

In the first round, only 1 percent of Muslim voters embraced Sarkozy, with 64 percent voting for Segolene Royal. That French Muslims supported a woman socialist candidate so overwhelmingly shows how few of them have a fundamentalist mindset. Most French Muslim youth are relatively remote from the culture of their grandparents and the rioting was economic in character.

In his acceptance speech, Sarkozy said he would try to be president of all the French. I hope he meant to include the workers and immigrants. If not, his tenure could be turbulent.

12 Comments:

At 5:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let's give him a chance to show what he can accomplish with his first 100 days program!

 
At 6:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"(About 18 percent of the French are practicing Roman Catholics; most of these congregations have tended to vote Gaullist. Some 45 percent of practicing Catholics voted in the first round for Sarkozy, with only 11 percent voting Socialist. The rest must have voted for the centrist candidate, Francois Bayrou.)"

I would think that the practicing Catholics would be split between Bayrou and Le Pen (he still got some 10% of the vote)

 
At 7:20 AM, Blogger Syrian Nationalist Party said...

Like USA Patriot act and other laws, Sarkosi is not a sign of progress but that of decline. Both the American and French Republics are now in confirmed decline in history. The future Powers are clear Russia foremost ( because it own its own oil), India (secured oil resources next door)and China ( to lesser extent, lack of oil security).

 
At 7:51 AM, Blogger anne said...

Highly perceptive comments.

Europe steadfastly refuses to learn from the last 40 years of US history.

If you relegate a visibly identifiable group of people to a permanent underclass, you're asking for trouble: the only solution is to remove the discrimination. Period.

And Reaganesque "law and order" is not a good solution to the above problem. The first victims of crime are the lower social classes, and Americans have long realized that a good police force is a friend in such a community.

I read Italian media every day and see no commentators that have a clue about these principles that are obvious to any American.

 
At 8:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

On the issue of immigrants and Mr Sarkozy, it would be appropriate to mention that Nicolas Sarkozy is the son of a Hungarian immigrant father and Jewish mother.

 
At 9:53 AM, Blogger fratliff said...

1789

'Can Sarkozy Uphold the Values of 1789?'

This depends on what 'values' are addressed. As is known, the French Revolution was one that purportedly bestowed 'Liberté, égalité, fraternité' upon the French people to the detriment of the King, Church, and privileged classes. Ironically, the loser in this election was one whose name is 'Royal,' the effect of which on the election may be heretofore unknown, perhaps benefiting her opponent. It is also noted that Sarko is also of immigrant status, one whose background includes, variously, Hungarian and Greek antecedents. The issue of immigrants might be coloured by the crazy quilt of his own family fabric, seeking some form of inclusiveness or belonging, wanting to be a paternalistic figure to others, compensating for the father he never knew.*

Should the 'French' in the man take precedence, it should be tempered with his affinity for the foreign elements. As reported, 'Sarkozy has sought to ease the sometimes tense relationships between the general French population and the Muslim community. Unlike the Catholic Church in France with their official leaders or Protestants with their umbrella organisations, the French Muslim community had a lack of structure no group that could legitimately deal with the French government on their behalf. Sarkozy felt that the foundation of such an organisation was desirable. He supported the foundation in May 2003 of the private non-profit Conseil français du culte musulman (“French Council of Muslim Worship”), an organisation meant to be representative of French Muslims.[11] In addition, Sarkozy has suggested amending the 1905 law on the separation of Church and State, mostly in order to be able to finance mosques and other Muslim institutions with public funds[12] so that they are less reliant on money from outside of France.'* [[Footnotes] in article] The direction seems to be toward accommodation and assimilation but in an orderly manner, emphasising national identity over outside allegiances.

It seems unlikely that there will be a return to the 'Terror,' now that the 'Royal' has been defeated, perhaps signaling more of a figurative lopping off of the Socialist head than might otherwise be made known. True, there have been mob scenes, perhaps reminiscent of the mob rule imposed upon the French some two hundred years ago but the blades are unlikely to be taken out of mothballs, a value that was all-too-prominent way back then, used to remove unruly elements. Ironically, one of the more famous figures to be visited by 'Mme Guillotine' herself was Louis XVI himself. It is said that it was his suggestion to use a triangular and bevelled blade rather than a crescent-shaped one. 'The accuracy of his suggestion was amply confirmed when, nine months later, the triangular blade removed his own head.'**

In today's World, things are much more civilised and done in accordance with the 'rule of law.' Yet, we still have echoes of the Royal perdition and mob scenes. 'Love It or Leave It' might be something more akin to inviting people to one's house. Houseguests are expected to observe the customs and courtesies of their hosts and hostesses, something that goes against the American 'value' of the 'customer (or, as some like Target term 'guest') is always right.' Just as 'free speech' is contingent upon responsibility, so it is the case that civil or universal rights require accepting the requirements established by those doing the welcoming.

Long gone are the days when the 3 Stooges were in vogue with food fights, revived by the madman Belushi in 'Animal House' and again in 'Blues Brothers.' The French attitude toward such untoward behaviour is plainly demonstrated in a recent Crowe/Cotillard vehicle, 'A Good Year' (2006), in which American tourists are advised to go elsewhere should their palates and sensitivities find la cuisine Provençale too 'foreign.' Perhaps the whole tenor of the movie is its appeal to love it and not leave it, just like Sarko's perceived direction.


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarkozy
** *Execution,* Abbott (St Martin's, 2006)

 
At 10:41 AM, Anonymous Phillip Supino said...

When considering the impact of Sarkozy's election in France Sunday, it is important to look at how France's position in the EU and in relationship to the US will change. Under Chirac, France did not partner extensively with the US on intell. sharing and prosecution of the war on terror. however, it is highly likely that Sarkozy will use use the GWOT to improve US-France relations, increasing French involvement in a variety of law enforcement and economic warfare initiatives alongside the US. Also, Sarkozy seems poised to use the nationalist wave that landed him in office to further pull the French public away from the EU. After rejecting the EU constitution by referendum in 2005, the French have only become further disenchanted with the idea of binding European unity. Sarkozy's neo-liberal economic policies and stance towards the US will only deepen this divide. Sarkozy will prove to be a polarizing figure on many fronts.

 
At 5:48 PM, Blogger MonsieurGonzo said...

wow. this is the first time that i have ever read one of your posts, professor, where you seem to have entirely mis-read, i daresay mis-judged history with extreme prejudice.

what a tragic disappointment, mon ami.

 
At 9:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All French are nationalists, and their right is to the left of the Democrats. I think your perspective is flawed. I hope your Iraqi coverage is sounder - I've been reading it, and relying on it, for a long time.

 
At 10:37 PM, Blogger Michael Harold said...

Can Sarkozy Uphold the Values of 1789?

Juan,

This is serious stuff and you are a serious writer, but sometimes you'll write something that would make Oscar Wilde laugh out loud and then bow in admiration.

 
At 6:26 AM, Anonymous dearkitty said...

Who voted for Royal; who voted for Sarkozy, in terms of workers-rich; men-women, young-old voters? See here.

 
At 9:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, contrary to some previous comments, I think your analysis is quite sound. Only the title is misleading. Nobody speaks of the values of 1789 anymore.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home