Samarra Fallout
Surge not Working
The Sadr Bloc in parliament [Sawt al- Iraq in Arabic] is threatening to suspend their participation in legislation in protest against the failure to rebuild and protect the Shiite Askariya shrine in Samarra. Often the Iraqi parliament, many of whose members live abroad, cannot get a quorum without the Sadrists (32 seats), who are more likely to be in Baghdad for votes. The Sadrists are blaming "the hidden hand of the Occupation" for the bombing (i.e. it is Bush's fault.) If they really do suspend participation in parliament, it would probably mean that no benchmark legislation will be passed any time soon-- not the petroleum law, not revision of the laws on de-Baathification, not constitutional amendments. Nada. Zilch.
Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani called for "self-discipline" and "refusal to target innocents in reprisal" for the blowing up of the shrine's minarets on Wednesday, according to the same report.
There appear to have been Sunni-Shiite clashes at mosques in the southern port city of Basra after Wednesday morning's bombing of the Askariya Shrine in Samarra. Some Sunni mosques were attacked elsewhere but a curfew in the northern cities probably forestalled some of that sort of retaliatory violence.
There was also a big labor demonstration in Basra on Wednesday by former workers at defunct Iraqi state-owned factories (petrochemicals, steel, etc.) who want the Iraqi government to revive these industries [in Arabic via Sawt al-Iraq]. The Bush administration shut down the state-owned factories as part of its plan to destroy Arab socialism, and appears to have believed that the magic hand of the market would miraculously start back up Iraqi industries. The bankruptcy of American laissez faire as a development tool is pretty obvious in the economic catastrophe that Bush visited on Iraq. This big labor demonstration will not be reported in the American press, which generally is pitched to be about and for people who make at least $80,000 a year.
Bahrain Shiites demonstrated in Manama against the further attack on the Askariya Shrine in Samarra. Buying into the widespread conspiracy theories in the region, many blamed the US, and chanted "Death to America." Sunni-ruled Bahrain hosts the most important US naval base in the Gulf. Two-thirds of Bahrainis are Shiites, and they feel disenfranchised by the Sunni monarchy and often resent the base.
An Iranian embassy official in Baghdad admitted that the Samarra attack was probably the work of the Iraqi Baath Party. Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad had blamed the US, while the US fingered "al-Qaeda." The Baathists are the best candidate. Samarra is a Sunni Arab city with a strong Baath cell, and the Baathists are secularists who have a history of being willing to shell religious edifices for political reasons (e.g. attacks on Najaf in spring 1991). My readers who like conspiracy theorists should pay attention to this story; an Iranian observer in Baghdad would likely have some intelligence on this matter. In the first Sawt al-Iraq story cited above, Iraqi Sunni vice president Tariq al-Hashimi also implicitly blamed the Baathists.
One in six US-trained Iraqi policemen are killed or vanish. Makes it hard to recruit police and even harder to recruit police who will actively patrol neighborhoods. This is one problem with the US surge strategy, which is that it depends heavily on getting Iraqi security forces to do neighborhood policing in Baghdad. A high-risk activity.
Violence has surged in Iraq since the beginning of the new security plan according to a Congressional study. There was initially, in February and March, a decrease in sectarian death squad killings (i.e. bodies in the street in cities like Baghdad), but those have mostly gone back up. The significant decrease of attacks in al-Anbar province, which appears to have to do with the chieftains of the Dulaim and other major tribes turning on the Salafi Jihadis formerly active there was offset by increased violence in Diyala and Ninevah Provinces. More suicide bombings are now taking place daily in Iraq as a whole than before the 'surge.' The population of Baghdad Province, about 1/4 of the country, is especially favorable toward militias as a tool of neighborhood self-protection, not an attitude shared by Iraqis in most of the rest of the country.
The report finds that about a third of Iraqis are now in favor of partition of the country. But that statistic is useless if we are not told more about the sample. Some 20% of Iraqis are Kurds, and almost all of them want to secede. If it is a weighted sample with strong Kurdish participation, then it would suggest that few Arab Iraqis favor partition, which is what my guess would be.
One caveat is that studies like this often focus on major attacks, especially bombings, which had some degree of success. But the Lancet study of 1800 households found that 86% of violent deaths come from people just being shot down, and that this sort of violence is common throughout the country, not just in select provinces. Not all of it is political in character (there are Mafia turf wars, tribal feuds, etc., which go along with having a failed state such as that in Iraq). About a third of violent deaths came from US military activities. Since the US has begun bombing Iraqi cities again as part of the 'surge,' deaths from aerial strikes have certainly risen, but these probably are not even counted in the Congressional study. Some 500 Iraqis are probably being killed a day in such daily violence, a fraction of the deaths reported by US wire services, though most of these deaths are not specifically "insurgent-" or "politically" derived.
Reuters reports major political violence for Wednesday. Three US troops were announced killed. Other major incidents:
' BAGHDAD - Four civilians were killed and 10 wounded when several mortar rounds hit residential areas in south and southwestern districts of Baghdad, police said. . .
RAMADI - Four Iraqi policemen were killed and 11 officers wounded by a suicide car bomber targeting their checkpoint outside Ramadi, 110 km (68 miles) west of Baghdad. . .
KHAN BANI SAAD - One person was killed and eight wounded on Tuesday when a truck laden with chlorine exploded near an Iraqi army base in the town of Khan Bani Saad [Diyala], about 30 km (20 miles) northeast of Baghdad, police said. . .
MANDILI - A bomb targeting the police chief of the town of Mandili killed three of his bodyguards and wounded five other people, including the police chief, police said. Mandili is in Dilyala Province, near the Iranian border. . .
KIRKUK - A bridge southwest of Kirkuk connecting this northern city with Tikrit was blown up overnight in a roadside bomb attack, police said. . .
Bill O'Reilly does not think any of this is important, or, actually, thinks reporting what goes on in Iraq is a form of treason. Just remember, as Orwell's 1984 reminds us: "War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength."
Labels: Iraq

|
12 Comments:
Doctor Cole,
There are a lot of things that should be done in the turbulent parts of Iraq to improve living conditions. The spectrum of essential services that used to be provided, from clean water to health clinics, should be restored. Bringing back ordinary commerce like buying groceries (or sometimes picking up commodities distributed through the government ration program) and sipping tea at a café would return a sense of normalcy. These are all worthy goals, and we should seek to restore them.
But one thing is more important than everything else. One thing must happen before the others are even possible. Communities must be made safe again.
You report that one sixth of Iraqi policemen trained by the US have been killed or have vanished. Normally, the local police force is the thin blue line that separates a community from crime and violence, and this protection is vanishing. But in Iraq, the national police force is an instrument of sectarian power projection. In Sunni communities, the Iraqi Police are not kin or brothers or neighbors; they are Shi’a from other parts of the country. They are often Shi’a who seek to avenge injuries from an earlier era by treating the Sunni badly. In these areas, the Iraqi Police are just another foreign occupation force.
For General Dempsey to act as if the Iraqi Police were a force for stability and security in Sunni areas is simply dishonest.
The way to take the wind out of the sails of the Sunni Resistance (technically, its not an Insurgency) is to institute home rule. Let Sunnis run their own local communities. Ask the authentic indigenous local leaders of Sunni neighborhoods and towns to raise a local security force, which will mostly be drawn from the Resistance movement. MNSTC-I CPATT’s should be dispatched to train and professionalize these forces. They should be armed for the local security mission, but not well enough to conduct offensive operations. Once trained, MNF-I units should conduct a couple weeks of joint patrols with these local security forces, and General Petraeus should preside over a formal hand-off ceremony.
These local security forces WILL establish local security. They will root out foreign Jihadis. They will protect pipelines and water treatment plants. They will escort and protect US convoys transiting their territory.
This is the “Model Communities” approach to stabilizing Iraq. It is the only course that leads to US success. It quickly permits the withdrawal of most US troops. It will draw refugees back from Jordan and Syria, once communities are stable. It will permit the inborn business spirit of the locals to blossom and create a functioning economy.
Since late 2003 it has been the only sensible approach, in that it empowers Iraqis to choose their own future, and renounces imperialism. It is not a US prerogative, for example, to decide to split Iraq up. Now that we have lived through 4 years of stay-the-course and stay-the-course II and surge to stay-the-course III, it is time to try a rational approach. It is time to choose our strategy based on what serves US interests, and based on what is achievable.
Also note that the USA is militarily occupying Iraq. We can ignore the Administration's assertion that sovereignty was restored on June 28, 2004. The US continues to maintain a de facto occupation even now.
Under international law (the Geneva Conventions,) an occupation power is responsible for the protection of the occupied nation and its population. We have not met this responsibility. It is not possible to meet it by using US soldiers to patrol and suppress crime and violence, for many reasons. They only way to fulfill this legal and moral obligation is by developing and empowering local security forces.
This is the world's leading blog on such matters. If this community was to finally step up and endorse this, the only path to success and stability, that would come to the attention of Ambassador Crocker.
May God bless you all. Peace.
Avid Student
Dr. Cole,
You often mention that many of the members of the Iraqi parliament live abroad and that it impacts the ability to achieve a quorum or pass legislation. This is a point that seems to be missing in the main stream press. Can you provide more detail and information on how many are living abroad and how that impacts the ability of the Iraqi government to function? Thank you.
Just my suspicious nature? But I can't help suspecting that these repeated attacks on the Samarra shrine are false flag operations, meant to increase sectarian strife in Iraq... Cui bono?
Last I read, Iraq is pumping 1.7 millions barrels a day compared to about 2.5 when Saddam was doing the pumping. Still a lot of oil. With no meters on the pumps, makes a nice "skim" opportunity for someone.
Now, I'm sympathetic to those fighting against the new oil law bill, but wouldn't be surprised if those benefitting from the "skim" are also fighting against the law.
Sure doesn't benefit Blackwater, etc. to have stability.
Love your bog, Juan, but I would like to see more focus on "the money"...which might help make it all more understandable.
When Abraham Lincoln was waiting for news from the front one day, someone used the aphorism, "No news is good news." Lincoln replied that if that were applied to a fisherman he wouldn't find it comforting to be told, "No fish is good fish."
The fact that the constant turmoil in Iraq is no longer "news" to Bill O'Reilly should tell you why he's no longer a serious journalist in any way, shape or form.
I hope you'll share your take on the interview General Petraeus gave USA Today today, Dr. Cole.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-06-14-qa-petraeus_N.htm
Apparently, he sees surprising signs of "normalcy."
I notice a lot of Mr. O'Reilly's beliefs are based on the ratings of his show. Not on the correctness or even moral stance but on how many TVs are tuned in. Democracy by association?
Juan, thank you for keeping us informed every single day. Your site is a must read for me.
Dr Cole,
I try to avoid conspiracy theories, and Iraq is getting to the point where you really don't know who is doing what. At best you can guess on who a particular action benefits and hence draw the most likely candidate and even that is not clear.
In case of the most recent Samarra attack, it is interesting to remember the Bush administration/UN investigation logic for implicating Syria in bombs that killed Rafik Hariri. As I recall, one of the arguments was that with 15,000 troops in Lebanon, Syria must have known about the incident.
Rockets rain on Baghdad's Green Zone
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070615/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=Am_d1E9NnZL98oS7vyE9lHZvaA8F
The barrage of rockets and mortars included one that hit on a street close to the Iraq parliament less than a half hour before Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte passed nearby.
The attack again showed militants' resilience — including their ability to strike the heavily protected zone — despite a US led security crackdown across the city that began exactly four months ago.
"What's happening in Gaza?"
"Civil war, the next to last stage
of divide and conquer."
"And the last stage?"
"Genocide"
Bill O'Reilly is a disgrace to his species. If the man ever spoke a word of sense, he would end up apologizing for it. He couldnt bear the strain of telling the truth. His comments that no one cares about the bombings or what is happening in Tikrit are the assumptions of an ass. His narcissism is so pronounced, that he thinks others are as callous and indifferent to suffering as he is. Still, I must award Barbara Bush the prize for craven elitism, when she stated that the beautiful minds of her family could not be bothered with body counts. The apple obviously didnt fall far from the tree, since her son insisted on sacrificing more lives in a surge that was meant to buy HIM more time to dump his disaster. Bush's paultry little ego requires that:1. He impose his will. 2. He never admits he is wrong. 3.He never holds himself accountable 4. He dumps his failures on others. Meanwhile, the crackpots in Congress enable his every whim, and seem no more distressed by the failure of the stupidly conceived surge, than Mama Bush is about body counts.
Post a Comment
<< Home