Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Bombing of Yazidis;
Summit Fizzles

Local officials in the two villages of of Al-Qataniyah and Al-Adnaniyah in northern Iraq (not far from Mosul) maintained Wednesday morning that 4 car bombs had killed over 200 persons and wounded a similar number. Police were expecting the death toll to rise, since many bodies are in buildings collapsed by the conflagrations. The US military said there were 5 car bombs, and gave a much lower estimate of 60 killed. On this sort of thing, I'd trust the Iraqi figures; they know when their own friends and relatives are missing.

The operation resembled the horrific bombing of the Shiite Turkmen of Armili on July 2. Note that first Shiite Turkmen were targeted and now Kurdish Yazidis. They have in common not being Sunni Arabs. My suspicion is that these bombings are not just an attempt to spread fear and intimidation, but are actually part of a struggle for control of territory. The Sunni Arab guerrillas face powerful challenges from Kurds and Shiites with regard to the future of provinces such as Ninevah, Diyala and Kirkuk. A lot of Kurdish police and troops have been deployed in Mosul not far from Tuesday's bombings, and they are seen as among the deadliest enemies by the Sunni Arab guerrillas. Sooner or later, my guess is that the Sunni Arabs will wage a major war with the Kurds over the oil fields of Kirkuk.

The situation in Iraq is so horrific that merely bad news is drowned out by the truly awful. Thus, on Tuesday, guerrillas bombed a major bridge connecting Taji and Baghdad with the north, throwing several cars into the river and killing some 10 persons. I.e., this is a Minneapolis-scale event. But it will barely get mentioned given the massive bombings of the Yazidis.

10 US troops have been killed in the past two days, including 5 who died in a helicopter crash Tuesday. Ten. That's worth a headline all by itself.

Likewise this story about "US raid on Shi'ite slum sparks anger on streets". It is suspicious that the US military claims never to kill civilians in Sadr City, while the Shiites are always having funeral processions for children.

The Deputy Oil Minister and several of his aides were kidnapped at gun point by 50 men in the uniform of the Iraqi security forces on Tuesday. This incident speaks volumes about the lack of security in Baghdad still, since the deputy oil minister should have had the resources to protect himself. Iraqi sources are claiming that it was an act of criminality (i.e. they are holding him for ransom), but I am skeptical of that claim. I have no counter-evidence, it just does not sound right to me. It is more likely that this operation was a matter of sectarian rivalry or revenge, possibly between Iraqi government ministries.

The reconciliation summit called by President Jalal Talabani appears to have fizzled. According to al-Zaman, the meeting just turned into luncheon with cold cuts, and no serious work was accomplished. The leaders had decided to keep the Sadrists and the Islamic Virtue (Fadhila) Party away, since they are usually unyielding. Sunni VP Tariq al-Hashimi, declined to attend the break-out session. The Sunni Arab figures attending declined to talk politics.

McClatchy is contradicting Pentagon claims that bombings and civilian casualties are down:


U.S. officials say the number of civilian casualties in the capital is down 50 percent. But U.S. officials declined to provide specific numbers, and statistics gathered by McClatchy Newspapers don't support the claim. The number of car bombings in July actually was 5 percent higher than the number recorded last December, according to the McClatchy statistics, and the number of civilians killed in explosions is about the same."


You will hear the Pentagon claim about less violence (!) repeated ad nauseam on all the cable television news channels and in the major print media. You won't hear anyone say that McClatchy's figures dispute the claim. For more on how the surge is being spun and key indicators of rising violence are being misstated or misinterpreted, see my last Salon column.

An international labor federation has backed Iraq's oil union and condemned Petroleum Minister Hussein Shahristani for attempting to sideline it using Baath-era laws.

Tom Englehardt considers the troop escalation in Iraq and the echoes of Vietnam in contemporary political rhetoric.

At our Global Affairs Group Blog don't miss Barnett Rubin's "WSJ vs. NYT: is the Afghan glass half empty or half full?"

Labels:

6 Comments:

At 9:59 AM, Blogger The Buffalo In The Midst said...

"Likewise this story about "US raid on Shi'ite slum sparks anger on streets". It is suspicious that the US military claims never to kill civilians in Sadr City,"

That's most likely because the US considers sadr city to be a 'free fire zone' when they intrude.

They are ALL combatants.

Makes sense, right?

 
At 10:59 AM, Anonymous Ross said...

One of the American military deaths announced recently was a young man from Mahomet, Illinois.

 
At 11:58 AM, Blogger The Buffalo In The Midst said...

Travus T. Hipp, the news commentator I transcribe to archive.org every morning, had something to say about the Iraqi insurgent's tactics today:

In The News: It’s ON! An insurgent ’surge’ in Iraq. Three bridges blown up outside of Baghdad, forcing the US military to use vulnerable helicopter transport or move along booby-trapped roadways. Also a three-truck bombing in the north. More, Details.

More ‘bad news from Baghdad’: The insurgents go visiting government officials at home, capturing the Deputy oil minister and others from the oil ministry.

In order to find them, we’ll… well… see the blurb above about being set up for an ambush any way we go."


He also noted another burgeoning benchmark in our war on Iraq: 3699 US casualties.
One unlucky American soldier will become a ’significant statistic’ sometime today, if not even as I type this.

Audio in full here: [August 15 2007] Travus T. Hipp Morning News & Commentary:
Iraq Sitrep: The Iraqi Insurgents Begin Their Surge Leading Up To The ‘Petraeus Report’ To Congress


...or at archive.org

 
At 5:24 PM, Blogger dancewater said...

Yazidis speak the Kurdish language, but they are not Kurds. They have other enemies besides the Sunni Muslims of Iraq, although I suspect that is the group behind this attack.

"Tensions have also run high between elements of the Yazidi community and the Kurdish political parties in Ninewa province and in the northern Kurdish autonomous zone, including a series of killings in Mosul and the Kurdish region as well as arson attacks in April that torched both Yezidi and Kurdish offices.

Areas in Nineva province with significant Yazidi populations are due to vote in an upcoming referendum on whether or not to join the Kurdish autonomous zone, stoking tensions between some Yazidis and Kurds on opposite sides of that political question."

http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/3933/Ninewa_Attack_Deadliest_Since_War_Began



They have begged for protection:

http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/2468/Yazidis_Ask_Iraqi_Government_for_Protection

 
At 12:45 AM, Anonymous rastadan said...

Woodstock started 38 years ago today

Sure a few months later US had a "No good lying SOB"--Truman's words in "Plain Speaking"--elected President who won with a secret plan to end the Second Indochinese War.

Surprise, Surprise, secret plan escalated conflict with thousands more American troops dead and wounded, illegal exspansion of war into Cambodia and Laos, tens of thousands more Vietnamese civilians dead and maimed, US troops and civilians poisoned still by dioxin, some vets now homeless, and Nixon still got the same terms to get out 3 years later: "peace with honor." Extra side of surge with your escalation anyone? Depleted Uranium for dessert?

"There is nothing new under the son," wrote the preacher in Ecclesiastes. Then, US supported a small Catholic military minority in a mostly Buddhist country. Now our troops sit amidst a religious civil war of longer duration than the 100 years war, sparked anew by President Cheney.

At least then we had a media that questioned rather than caved and legislators like Senator Sam Ervin who defended the Constitution rather than cravenly crush it to fight a "global war on terror."

What a fascist, cowardly crock! Like Vidal wrote, " You can't declare war on a noun."

May the Lord have mercy on my soul. I actually miss Nixon!

Jimi's version of "Star Spangled Banner" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6_dkoow5TM

Richie Havens with "Freedom" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk0sBEbqU5M

Contry Joe (language warning) To paraphrase, I don't give a frack about Iraq.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5btZWbViPA

CSN "Tell them who we are. They'll know if you just sing, 49 53, hike"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVEUbIgJa9Q

Janis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJnoMP1Uyc

thanks for the memories Suburban Gueriilla. http://susiemadrak.com/

PS Not from Woodstock but apropos and awesome vids

Neil Young "Shock and Awe" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJmKZxNG0S8
"Let's Impeach the President" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4kTnP5VJ1k

Olberman's J'Accuse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U3nhevWfro

College Republican Chickenhawks, some from UCF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFGit_tZDqs

Bobby Kennedy's funeral procession http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4vJxi9Kis

PPS Let's hope and pray that something did not die with Bobby for we still remain "Volunteers of America http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER9b0yWGcfs

PPPS Sorry South Park, you ands Matt and Trey probably voted for Pres. Cheney 2x so for you Bobby asnd Johnny http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvuijyz6Yac

 
At 3:16 AM, Blogger Christiane said...

Personnally, I'd rather link it to the oil law : most Iraqi are dissatisfied with the pressures of the US concerning the over generous conditions which the draft law prepare for foreign companies.
And this isn't a sectarian thing : both the unions, the Iraqi oil professionals, the Sadrists and of course the Sunni are opposed to this law.
Only the Kurds, the SCIRI and Al'Maliki is supporting this draft.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home