Informed Comment

Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion

Juan Cole is President of the Global Americana Institute

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Guerrilla War 3.0 in Iraq;
Attacks in Bayji, Yusufiya, Elsewhere, Kill 32, Wound Dozens;
Dulaimi's Sunnis Unlikely to Rejoin Government

Guerrillas differ from conventional armies in that they typically avoid direct, conventional engagements on the battlefield. They melt away before a conventional army's advance, and then reemerge to engage in sniping, sneak attacks, and bombings from an unexpected quarter. The advantage of Fred Kagan's troop escalation or "surge" is that it allowed a tamping down of violence in Baghdad through a US campaign to disarm the Sunni Arabs there. There were two disadvantages of it. First, it allowed the Shiite militias to take advantage of the disarming of many Sunni Arabs, and to ethnically cleanse hundreds of thousands of Sunnis from the capital during the past six months. As a result, Baghdad is virtually a Shiite city now, like Isfahan or Shiraz. Second, the Sunni guerrillas melted away in West Baghdad, either laying low or relocating to other provinces, so that the violence was displaced to the provinces. Very likely when the extra US troops are removed, the guerrillas will reemerge in the capital, though their loss of so many Sunni neighborhoods to the ethnic cleansing may put them at a disadvantage now.

The Sunni Arab guerrilla movement has clearly regrouped outside Baghdad and is deploying high explosives with deveastating effect in Diyala, Salahuddin, Ninevah and Kirkuk provinces, to the northeast and due north of Baghdad. Cells also remain active in the northern reaches of Babil province just south of Baghdad, where Saddam had planted Sunni families in what had been a Shiite area, sowing the seeds of conflict when the Shiites returned to reclaim their property from 2003.

There were two big bombings in Diyala on Friday and a major attack in Mosul, a city nearly the size of Houston several hundred miles north of the capital On Saturday, the guerrillas deployed two big car bombs in Bayji, an oil refining center just northwest of Saddam's home town of Tikrit north of Baghdad. One car exploded with massive force outside the house of Ali al-Juburi, the counter-terrorism chief in the local police force, killing 11 individuals (7 of them policemen) and wounding 44 other persons. Another bomb targeting a police station killed 6 and wounded 15, and damaged surrounding buildings.

South of Baghdad in Babil Province, the US military forestalled a planned attack on American soldiers by a guerrilla cell at Yusufiya. They engaged well-armed cell members and the fighting grew so deadly that the US troops had to call in air strikes on their foe. They killed 10 guerrillas from the air and found a weapons cache. A mortar attack in nearby Mahmudiya killed one child and wounded two others. In addition, in Baghdad itself guerrillas used a roadside bomb to wound two police commandoes (these are usually recruited from the Shiite Badr Corps, the Iran-trained paramilitary of the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq (ISCI).

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that Adnan Dulaimi, the head of the Sunni fundamentalist Iraqi Accord Front, has been released from any confinement and is back in his house. But he expressed doubt that his bloc will rejoin the Shiite government of Nuri al-Maliki. He said Iraqi President Jalal Talabani had sent over some Peshmerga (Kurdish) bodyguards to protect Dulaimi. A car bomb was found near his house Thursday a week ago and one of his personal bodyguards had the key. Dulaimi claims that he the target of a Salafi Jihadi assassination plot, with the extremists having infiltrated his staff. (Whether that is true or not, it has happened to other Sunni politicians cooperating with the new government). Al-Hayat says that its sources in ISCI maintain that they are still negotiating with the Iraqi Islamic Party, a constituent of the Iraqi Accord Front, in hopes it will rejoin the al-Maliki government.

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that the Mosul city council has decided to dig a ditch around the northern city of 1.5 million to keep radical Sunni extremists out. The council has seen an uptick of relocation of militants to the city from Baghdad. Cities haven't had moats since the medieval period. Such modern advancement, the Bush administration has brought to Iraq.

Leila Fadel's blog from Baghdad is revealing on the fears of a teenager that his mother may end up killed for working for a Western news service. He wishes he had more typical teenage problems, but his are that he cannot bring home friends since they would find out about his mother's employment.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 6:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Sunni parties are only a small part of the problems facing the Iraqi government's house of cards. The bigger problem now is the Kurds. They form two of the four-pary bloc that is ruling Iraq despite being a minority. The public confrontation over the Kirkuk and oil conrtract between them and the other two is in full swing.

The Kurds are under a lot of grass-root pressure to withdraw from Maliki's governement. This will cause a certain collapse, but they do not know were that would leave them. They have been talking to secualr and Sunni groups, but I do not see how they can form a government with them. On the other hand they see themselves gaining nothing from Maliki, and also want to hurt him.

Another confrontation within Maliki's Da'wa party is now in the open too. A large group have come out saying that the US-Iraq long-term deal is "a red line".

A major problem for the US is the new consensus by all the non-Kurdish parties to remove the production-sharing clauses from the oil law. This is the end of the world for the Americans, but they can't do much about it. All the millions in lobbying fees are down the toilets too.

In addition, nearly all the Iraqi academics and people with good standing have abandoned all hope with the "political process". These have given credibility to the basically underworld figures who found themselves at the top of the pyramid. The academics are now saying that the whole ruling class must go.

 
At 10:21 AM, Anonymous Texas Little El said...

If I might ask, is this an indication that we have to stay in Iraq indefinitely or a reason to leave Iraq to its own devices so it can sort these types of problems out within the three factions that currently dominate Iraqi politics?

Also, if this is true, why did violence drop off in southern Iraq after the British troops left, Basra noticably?

 
At 11:00 AM, Blogger McCutchen said...

Juan,
In your comments today you did not address two other developments that some have cited as contributors to the decline in violence in some areas - the US payments to the tribal levies which seem to be made up of "former" insurgents to a great degree and as well to the 6 month stand down that Muqtada ordered for the Mahdi Army.

Your thought on how and to what extent these contribute to the lull and what the implications are for the future would be welcome

 
At 2:23 PM, Blogger Mark Pyruz said...

Professor Cole, I notice you group Baghdad with Shiraz and Isfahan, two cities in Iran. Was this intentional? You could have grouped it with Basra and made the same point.

I do agree with your depiction of the current Iraqi battlefield.

 
At 1:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Professor,

just a clarification on the comment on "moats."

To the best of my knowledge, this is the second time that an Iraqi community
has voluntarily chosen to build a barrier around itself to facilitate control within a designated boundary.

The first was a neighborhood within Baghdad, whose name I cannot recall,
that chose about 8 months ago to surround itself with Hesco Barriers and T-walls to isolate itself from the violence beyond the walls.

Prior to that, Coalition forces have used a berm, about 3 meters high, to surround and isolate Sammarra,
concertina wire fences to define the official limits of parts of Fallujah,
and T-walls to cordon off Adhamiyah.

This is the second 'Medieval' consequence of the "Model Communities" approach.
The better known consequence is the breakup of Iraq into a patchwork of discrete feudal cities.

Would that the country could be stabilized otherwise.
Alas.

The MC approach requires the use of natural or man-made linear terrain features to demarcate the boundaries of a community.
These must be barriers to easy in- or exfiltration.

The local authority is held responsible for everything that happens within the boundaries,
including protection of national assets like oil pipelines.

.......

I share your sadness at the regression.
But nothing good will happen in Iraq until city blocks and villages and neighborhoods are secure.
That is the first step, the foundation.

Foreign occupation that will be resisted to the death cannot deliver that local security.
A national army or national police force that is controlled by one faction cannot do it.

.
Your Avid Student

 

Post a Comment

<< Home